IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/82-12-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lokale Kriminalitätsberichterstattung: Abbild oder Zerrspiegel von Kriminalität?

Author

Listed:
  • Eric van Um
  • Michael Huch
  • Mathias Bug

Abstract

The present report analyzes crime reporting in newspapers and compares this to actual crime rates and fear of crime. One key finding is that crime-related issues play a comparativelyminor role in local editions of regional subscription newspapers. While this does not apply to the number of articles, it certainly does apply to the areas covered in these articles. It is often alleged that crime in the media is ubiquitous but this can only be confirmed to a limited degree in local reporting. A comparison of crime reporting with police crime statistics and the WISIND indicator on the fear of crime also shows a significant discrepancy, both geographically and in terms of specific offenses. First, there is clearly a disproportionately high focus in the print media on violent and sex offenses and, second, there is below-average reporting of more minor offenses. Consequently, cybercrime is relatively insignificant in the local media landscape even though it affects a broad cross-section of the population. The focus of crime reporting varies from one region to another and contradicts the official crime figures and fear of crime to some extent. Der vorliegende Bericht analysiert die Kriminalitätsberichterstattung in Zeitungen und vergleicht diese mit der tatsächlichen Kriminalitätsbelastung sowie der Furcht vor Kriminalität. Ein zentraler Befund ist, dass kriminalitätsbezogene Themen eine vergleichsweise geringe Rolle in den Lokalausgaben regionaler Abozeitungen spielen. Dies gilt zwar nicht in Bezug auf die Anzahl von Artikeln, aber sehr wohl für die Fläche, welche diese Artikel in der Gesamtberichterstattung einnehmen. Die häufig unterstellte Allgegenwart von Kriminalität in den Medien kann für die lokale Berichterstattung nur mit Einschränkungen bestätigt werden. Ein Abgleich von Kriminalitätsberichterstattung mit der Polizeilichen Kriminalstatistik und dem WISIND-Kriminalitätsfurchtindikator zeigt darüber hinaus eine erhebliche Diskrepanz sowohl in geographischer als auch deliktspezifischer Hinsicht: Deutlich wird einerseits eine in Printmedien auftretende überproportionale Fokussierung auf Gewalt-, Sexual- und Rohheitsdelikte und andererseits eine unterdurchschnittliche Berücksichtigung leichter Delikte. Die sich neu entwickelnde und die Bevölkerung in der großen Breite betreffende Internetkriminalität spielt in der lokalen Presselandschaft keine Rolle. Es lässt sich ein regional stark variierender Fokus auf Kriminalitätsberichterstattung belegen, der teilweise konträr zum offiziell bekannten Kriminalitätsgeschehen und zur Kriminalitätsfurcht steht.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric van Um & Michael Huch & Mathias Bug, 2015. "Lokale Kriminalitätsberichterstattung: Abbild oder Zerrspiegel von Kriminalität?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(12), pages 288-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-12-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.498295.de/15-12-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    security; crime; indicator; fear; fear of crime; home affairs; police; inner security; threat; crime statistics; police statistics; crime reporting; media analysis; local newspaper analysis; local media analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • R19 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Other
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H79 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other
    • H80 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-12-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.