IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v55y2026i5.html

Changing roles of marriage and family status for labor migration? The case of rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwen Lai

    (Universität Bielefeld)

  • Jing Song

    (Chinese University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Background: China has witnessed a continuous rise of couple migration and family migration. These migration developments possibly signal individuals’ changing considerations of marital and parenthood responsibilities in their migration decisions over time. Objective: We focus on one specific type of migration, first labor migration, and examine the gender and birth cohort patterns of how marriage and family status are associated with first labor migration among rural-origin Chinese individuals born between 1951 and 2000. Methods: Data are drawn from the 2018 round of the China Household Income Project. We calculate the median values for ages at first labor migration, first marriage, and first childbearing and use discrete-time logistics models to examine the gender and birth cohort differences in how first labor migration is related to marriage and family status. Results: First labor migration is negatively related to marriage and family status for both genders. The pattern of parents’ lower migration risk is more marked among mothers than among fathers. Over birth cohorts, a lower risk of first labor migration is observed among both fathers and mothers. A cohort trend toward lower risk of first labor migration is observed for married individuals but among women only. Contribution: Using a precise definition of migration and a sample not conditional on migration outcomes, we have demonstrated Chinese individuals’ changing patterns of life course events across birth cohorts and showed that the negative relationships between marital as well as childbearing responsibilities and first labor migration have grown stronger over birth cohorts, especially among women.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwen Lai & Jing Song, 2026. "Changing roles of marriage and family status for labor migration? The case of rural China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 55(5), pages 167-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:55:y:2026:i:5
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2026.55.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol55/5/55-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2026.55.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jia Yu & Yu Xie, 2015. "Changes in the Determinants of Marriage Entry in Post-Reform Urban China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1869-1892, December.
    2. Stark, Oded & Bloom, David E, 1985. "The New Economics of Labor Migration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 173-178, May.
    3. Hill Kulu & Nadja Milewski, 2007. "Family change and migration in the life course," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(19), pages 567-590.
    4. Mincer, Jacob, 1978. "Family Migration Decisions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 86(5), pages 749-773, October.
    5. Jan M. Hoem, 2014. "The dangers of conditioning on the time of occurrence of one demographic process in the analysis of another," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(2), pages 151-159, July.
    6. Jan Hoem & Lesia Nedoluzhko, 2016. "The dangers of using ‘negative durations’ to estimate pre- and post-migration fertility," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 359-363, September.
    7. Weiwen Lai, 2025. "Weaker intentions or lower realization? Explaining gender differences in labor migration from rural China," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Jia Yu & Yu Xie, 2021. "Recent trends in the Chinese family: National estimates from 1990 to 2010," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(25), pages 595-608.
    9. Meng, Lei & Zhao, Min Qiang & Liwu, Dewi Silvany, 2016. "Joint migration decisions of married couples in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 285-305.
    10. Sergi Vidal & Francisco Perales & Philipp M. Lersch & Maria Brandén, 2017. "Family migration in a cross-national perspective: The importance of institutional and cultural context," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(10), pages 307-338.
    11. repec:sae:mrxval:v:33:y:1999:i:4:p:929-953 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Zhiming Cheng & Mark Wang & Junhua Chen (ed.), 2014. "Urban China in the New Era," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-54227-5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanru Xiong, 2023. "Love is Elsewhere: Internal Migration and Marriage Prospects in China," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Roberto Impicciatore & Giuseppe Gabrielli & Anna Paterno, 2020. "Migrants’ Fertility in Italy: A Comparison Between Origin and Destination," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(4), pages 799-825, September.
    3. Livia Ortensi, 2015. "Engendering the fertility-migration nexus: The role of women's migratory patterns in the analysis of fertility after migration," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(53), pages 1435-1468.
    4. Hagen-Zanker, Jessica, 2010. "Modest expectations: Causes and effects of migration on migrant households in source countries," MPRA Paper 29507, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Wang, Chunchao & Zhang, Chenglei & Ni, Jinlan & Zhang, Haifeng & Zhang, Junsen, 2019. "Family migration in China: Do migrant children affect parental settlement intention?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 416-428.
    6. Kim, Jun Sung & Lee, Jongkwan, 2019. "The role of intergenerational mobility in internal migration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Cristina Procházková Ilinitchi, 2010. "Selected Migration Theories and their Importance on Drawing Migration Policies [Vybrané teorie migrace a jejich význam při vytváření migračních politik]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(6), pages 3-26.
    8. Feridhanusetyawan, Tubagus, 1994. "Determinants of interstate migration in the United States: A search theory approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000012252, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Nazareno Panichella & Stefano Cantalini, 2023. "Is Geographical Mobility Beneficial? The Impact of the South-to-North Internal Migration on Occupational Achievement in Italy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(5), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Grote, Ulrike & Waibel, Hermann, 2017. "Rural-Urban Migration, Welfare and Employment : Comparing Results from Thailand and Vietnam," 2017 ASAE 9th International Conference, January 11-13, Bangkok, Thailand 284809, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    11. Éric Rougier & Nicolas Yol, 2019. "The volatility effect of diaspora's location," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1796-1827, June.
    12. Jerzy Michalek & Nana Zarnekow, 2012. "Application of the Rural Development Index to Analysis of Rural Regions in Poland and Slovakia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 1-37, January.
    13. Matthew J. Bloomfield & Ulf Brüggemann & Hans B. Christensen & Christian Leuz, 2017. "The Effect of Regulatory Harmonization on Cross‐Border Labor Migration: Evidence from the Accounting Profession," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 55(1), pages 35-78, March.
    14. Aleksandr Grigoryan & Knar Khachatryan, 2018. "Remittances and Emigration Intentions: Evidence from Armenia," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp626, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    15. Mohammad Joarder & Syed Hasanuzzaman, 2008. "Migration decision from Bangladesh: permanent versus temporary," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 531-545, November.
    16. Iva Vuksanović Herceg Tomislav Herceg Lorena Škuflić, 2020. "New EU member states’ emigration: Projections for future and lessons for the new EU candidates," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 23(2), pages 129-140, November.
    17. Rohit Kumar Rawat & Jajati Keshari Parida, 2024. "A City which Attracts Large-Scale Migrants Fails to Create Enough Jobs for them," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(4), pages 1089-1116, December.
    18. Randall Kuhn & Bethany Everett & Rachel Silvey, 2011. "The Effects of Children’s Migration on Elderly Kin’s Health: A Counterfactual Approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(1), pages 183-209, February.
    19. van Dalen, H.P. & Henkens, C.J.I.M., 2013. "Explaining emigration intentions and behaviour in the Netherlands 2005-2010," Other publications TiSEM 511bab2c-f350-423e-9843-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Mauro Augusto dos Santos & Alisson Flávio Barbieri & José Alberto Magno de Carvalho & Carla Jorge Machado, 2010. "Migração: uma revisão sobre algumas das principais teorias," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td398, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:55:y:2026:i:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.