IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v49y2023i3.html

The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Antunes Leocádio

    (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG))

  • Anne Gauthier

    (Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI))

  • Rafael Costa

    (Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI))

  • Monika Mynarska

    (Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie)

Abstract

Background: The Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) enables investigating family-related events from a life course perspective. After its first round of face-to-face implementation, various factors resulted in the second round being implemented on the web. Despite its advantages, implementing a web-based GGS has its drawbacks ‒ for instance, possible misreporting, and especially underreporting, of life history variables due to the lack of on-site guidance. Objective: To assess the quality of GGS second-round data collected through the web by verifying the accuracy of fertility histories. Methods: We compare the GGS data with population-based estimates from open access sources, the Human Fertility Database (HFD) and the United Nations Population Division (UN), using three cohort indicators and one period fertility indicator that are frequently used as summary measures. We restrict the analysis to the female fertility history data of countries where the second round of the GGS was implemented via the web and the data processing has been completed: Estonia, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden. Results: For the four indicators, the GGS estimates are consistent with the population-based estimates. With a few exceptions, HFD and UN estimates fall within the GGS confidence intervals (CIs). Conclusions: Overall, we found similarities that demonstrate the high quality of the data. Our assessment finds no systematic deviation for the cohort indicators and small scale underreporting for the period indicator (nevertheless, also usually within the CIs). Contribution: The high level of similarity is encouraging for the use of GGS second-round data and the implementation of web-based methods of data collection.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Antunes Leocádio & Anne Gauthier & Rafael Costa & Monika Mynarska, 2023. "The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(3), pages 31-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:3
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol49/3/49-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorik Vergauwen & David De Wachter & Jonas Wood & Karel Neels, 2015. "Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(24), pages 723-774.
    2. Gerda Neyer & Trude Lappegård & Daniele Vignoli, 2013. "Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 245-272, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Beaujouan & Shalini Singh & Anna Šťastná & Martin Kreidl & Daniel Dvořák & Barbora Hubatková & Darina Kmentová & Jitka Slabá & Jasmin Passet-Wittig & Alice Goisis & Heini Väisänen, 2025. "First reproductive experience: A survey module," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(37), pages 1173-1206.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara S. Okun & Liat Raz‐Yurovich, 2019. "Housework, Gender Role Attitudes, and Couples' Fertility Intentions: Reconsidering Men's Roles in Gender Theories of Family Change," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 169-196, March.
    2. Alessandra Trimarchi & Jan Van Bavel, 2017. "Pathways to marital and non-marital first birth: the role of his and her education," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 15(1), pages 143-179.
    3. Kerstin Ruckdeschel & Lenore Sauer & Robert Naderi, 2016. "Reliability of retrospective event histories within the German Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(11), pages 321-358.
    4. Kamila Ishchanova, 2022. "Home Alone: Exploring Childcare Options to Remove Barriers to Second Childbearing in Belarus," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 112-123.
    5. Hippolyte d’ALBIS & Paula E. GOBBI & Angela GREULICH, 2017. "Having a Second Child and Access to Childcare : Evidence from European Countries," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 83(2), pages 177-210, June.
    6. Eugenio Paglino & Tom Emery, 2020. "Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(50), pages 1461-1494.
    7. Janetta Nestorová Dická & Filip Lipták, 2024. "Regional fertility predictors based on socioeconomic determinants in Slovakia," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1-43, September.
    8. Jonas Wood & Karel Neels & Jorik Vergauwen, 2016. "Economic and Institutional Context and Second Births in Seven European Countries," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 35(3), pages 305-325, June.
    9. Angela Greulich & Michael S. Rendall, 2026. "An Ongoing Gender Revolution in Europe: Women’s Stable Employment as a Precondition for Partnered First Births," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 45(1), pages 1-35, February.
    10. Begoña Elizalde-San Miguel & Vicente Díaz Gandasegui & María T. Sanz, 2023. "Growing Pains: Can Family Policies Revert the Decline of Fertility in Spain?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 269-281.
    11. Yin, Hua-Tang & Chang, Chun-Ping & Anugrah, Donni Fajar & Gunadi, Iman, 2023. "Gender equality and central bank independence," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 661-672.
    12. Chiara Ludovica Comolli, 2023. "Social Climate, Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions: from the Great Recession to the Covid-19 Crisis," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-57, December.
    13. Fabrizio De Fausti & Roberta Radini & Tiziana Tuoto & Luca Valentino, 2024. "Mobile phone data for population estimates and for mobility and commuting pattern analyses," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 78(1), pages 235-247, January-M.
    14. Michaela Kreyenfeld & Esther Geisler & Teresa Castro Martín & Tina Hannemann & Valerie Heintz-Martin & Marika Jalovaara & Hill Kulu & Silvia Meggiolaro & Dimitri Mortelmans & Inge Pasteels & Marta Sei, 2017. "Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(37), pages 1245-1274.
    15. Costanza Giannantoni & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2025. "Regional government institutions and the capacity for women to reconcile career and motherhood," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 311-328.
    16. Angela Greulich & Aurélien Dasré, 2017. "The quality of periodic fertility measures in EU-SILC," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(17), pages 525-556.
    17. Elizabeth Thomson & Maria Winkler-Dworak & Éva Beaujouan, 2019. "Contribution of the Rise in Cohabiting Parenthood to Family Instability: Cohort Change in Italy, Great Britain, and Scandinavia," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(6), pages 2063-2082, December.
    18. Karel Neels & Leen Marynissen & Jonas Wood, 2024. "Economic Cycles and Entry into Parenthood: Is the Association Changing and Does it Affect Macro-Level Trends? Micro-Level Hazard and Simulation Models of Belgian Fertility Trends, 1960–2010," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-34, December.
    19. Angela Greulich & Aurélien Dasre, 2017. "The quality of periodic fertility measures in EU-SILC," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01726581, HAL.
    20. Jessica Nisén & Anni Erlandsson & Marika Jalovaara, 2025. "Gendered Relationship of Childbearing with Earnings Accumulated by Midlife in Two Nordic Welfare States," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 685-707, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.