IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i37.html

First reproductive experience: A survey module

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Beaujouan

    (Universität Wien)

  • Shalini Singh

    (Universität Wien)

  • Anna Šťastná

    (Charles University)

  • Martin Kreidl

    (Masarykova Univerzita)

  • Daniel Dvořák

    (Masarykova Univerzita)

  • Barbora Hubatková

    (Masarykova Univerzita)

  • Darina Kmentová

    (Masarykova Univerzita)

  • Jitka Slabá

    (Charles University)

  • Jasmin Passet-Wittig

    (Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB))

  • Alice Goisis

    (University College London (UCL))

  • Heini Väisänen

    (Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED))

Abstract

Background: The first reproductive experience, particularly its timing, shapes reproductive pathways and the number of children a person has. However, most surveys that record childbearing histories do not ask about this formative initial experience. Objective: This questionnaire module on first reproductive experiences aims to improve the understanding of women’s and men’s reproductive pathways by capturing the timing, sequence, and outcomes of the first attempt to conceive or the first unplanned pregnancy. Methods: The module was developed through conceptual design, cognitive testing, and pilot implementation in the Czech Generations and Gender Survey (GGS-II. Wave 2). It collects data on age at first pregnancy attempt or first unplanned pregnancy, duration until conception or discontinuation of attempts, use of fertility treatments, and outcomes (e.g., abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth, or live birth). Results: Pilot testing demonstrated clear question comprehension and a smooth response process, even for sensitive items. Missing or ‘don’t know’ responses remained within a reasonable range (2%–10%), indicating the suitability of the module for large-scale surveys. Contribution: This novel instrument addresses critical gaps in fertility research by improving our understanding of contemporary reproductive experiences. By documenting the age and timing of events, it helps to (1) quantify reproductive difficulties and successes by age, (2) calculate Time to Pregnancy (TTP) and to live birth in the general population in an inclusive and accurate way, (3) link the first reproductive experience to broader life course factors. Integrating this module into demographic and family surveys allows building a bridge between reproductive health and demographic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Beaujouan & Shalini Singh & Anna Šťastná & Martin Kreidl & Daniel Dvořák & Barbora Hubatková & Darina Kmentová & Jitka Slabá & Jasmin Passet-Wittig & Alice Goisis & Heini Väisänen, 2025. "First reproductive experience: A survey module," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(37), pages 1173-1206.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:37
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/37/53-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathiowetz, Nancy A & Duncan, Greg J, 1988. "Out of Work, Out of Mind: Response Errors in Retrospective Reports of Unemployment," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 6(2), pages 221-229, April.
    2. Chen, Zheng-Ao & Li, Qi & Liu, Lan-Cui & Zhang, Xian & Kuang, Liping & Jia, Li & Liu, Guizhen, 2015. "A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 366-377.
    3. Lawrence L. Wu & Steven P. Martin & Daniel A. Long, 2001. "Comparing Data Quality of Fertility and First Sexual Intercourse Histories," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 36(3), pages 520-555.
    4. S. Philip Morgan & Ronald Rindfuss, 1999. "Reexamining the link of early childbearing to Marriage and to subsequent fertillty," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 36(1), pages 59-75, February.
    5. Victor Antunes Leocádio & Anne Gauthier & Rafael Costa & Monika Mynarska, 2023. "The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(3), pages 31-46.
    6. Karen Guzzo & Sarah Hayford, 2011. "Fertility Following an Unintended First Birth," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(4), pages 1493-1516, November.
    7. Kevin Lang & Ana Nuevo-Chiquero, 2012. "Trends in Self-reported Spontaneous Abortions: 1970–2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(3), pages 989-1009, August.
    8. Katherine M. Johnson & Karina M. Shreffler & Arthur L. Greil & Julia McQuillan, 2023. "Bearing the Reproductive Load? Unequal Reproductive Careers Among U.S. Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Jorik Vergauwen & David De Wachter & Jonas Wood & Karel Neels, 2015. "Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(24), pages 723-774.
    10. Ester Lazzari & Edith Gray & Bernard Baffour, 2022. "A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(1), pages 1-36.
    11. Massimiliano Bratti & Konstantinos Tatsiramos, 2012. "The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 291-321, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel M. Shattuck, 2017. "Does It Matter What She Wants? The Role of Individual Preferences Against Unmarried Motherhood in Young Women’s Likelihood of a Nonmarital First Birth," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(4), pages 1451-1475, August.
    2. Fumiya Uchikoshi & Ryohei Mogi, 2018. "Order matters: The effect of premarital pregnancy on second childbearing in Japan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(48), pages 1305-1330.
    3. Kara Joyner & H. Peters & Kathryn Hynes & Asia Sikora & Jamie Taber & Michael Rendall, 2012. "The Quality of Male Fertility Data in Major U.S. Surveys," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(1), pages 101-124, February.
    4. Eva Beaujouan & Kryštof Zeman & Mathías Nathan, 2023. "Delayed first births and completed fertility across the 1940–1969 birth cohorts," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(15), pages 387-420.
    5. Nadja Milewski & Jasmin Passet-Wittig & Martin Bujard, 2025. "Infertility and Seeking Medical Help to Have a Child Vary Across Migrant Origin Groups in Germany," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(2), pages 1-38, April.
    6. Sylvain Dessy & Francesca Marchetta & Roland Pongou & Luca Tiberti, 2024. "Women’s Relative Earning Power and Fertility: Evidence from Climate Shocks in Rural Madagascar," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_14.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    7. Sowmya Rajan & S. Philip Morgan & Kathleen Mullan Harris & David Guilkey & Sarah R. Hayford & Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2017. "Trajectories of Unintended Fertility," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(6), pages 903-928, December.
    8. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    9. Christian vom Lehn & Cache Ellsworth & Zachary Kroff, 2022. "Reconciling Occupational Mobility in the Current Population Survey," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(4), pages 1005-1051.
    10. repec:ces:ifodic:v:15:y:2017:i:2:p:31-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Koç, E., 2015. "Job Finding, Job Loss and Consumption Behaviour," Other publications TiSEM 257b35a1-8c5c-4662-88db-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Qin, Changlei & Yin, Junjun & Feng, Bo & Ran, Jingyu & Zhang, Li & Manovic, Vasilije, 2016. "Modelling of the calcination behaviour of a uniformly-distributed CuO/CaCO3 particle in Ca–Cu chemical looping," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 400-410.
    13. Katrin Drasch & Britta Matthes, 2013. "Improving retrospective life course data by combining modularized self-reports and event history calendars: experiences from a large scale survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 817-838, February.
    14. W. Michael Hanemann, 1994. "Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 19-43, Fall.
    15. repec:iab:iabfme:201702(en is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Thaís García-Pereiro & Anna Paterno, 2025. "Nonnationals’ Fertility and the Great Recession in Italy: A Panel Analysis of Quantum and Tempo Responses," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 175-209, March.
    17. Bonev, Petyo, 2020. "Nonparametric identification in nonseparable duration models with unobserved heterogeneity," Economics Working Paper Series 2005, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    18. Bridget Brew & Abigail Weitzman & Kelly Musick & Yasamin Kusunoki, 2020. "Young women's joint relationship, sex, and contraceptive trajectories: Evidence from the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(34), pages 933-984.
    19. Yang, Lin & Hou, Huiyun & Lv, Haodong & Wu, Guanqi & Xu, Bang & Li, Yiming, 2025. "Exploring the development path of bioenergy carbon capture and storage for achieving carbon neutrality in China: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Nisén, Jessica & Tassot, Johanna & Iacoella, Francesco & Eibich, Peter, 2024. "Does Early Timing of First Birth Lead to Lower Earnings in Midlife in Britain?," IZA Discussion Papers 17494, IZA Network @ LISER.
    21. Arnaud Chevalier & Tarja K. Viitanen & Tarja K. Viitanen, 2003. "The long-run labour market consequences of teenage motherhood in Britain," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 323-343, May.
    22. Massimiliano Bratti & Konstantinos Tatsiramos, 2012. "The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 291-321, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.