Accounting and Financial Reports in the Gambling Monopoly - Measures for a Moral Economic System
The state monopolies set over the gambling market are a propensity of society nature, actually of her moral fundaments, so the aim of this paper is to analyses gambling monopoly as a solution of moral economy. The term of moral economy has another connotation in this study because is used to describe the government’s policies of gambling monopolization settled to keep under control so called “morality industries” based on cause-effect qualitative analysis, with serious economic effects in condition of a market economy.
Volume (Year): (2013)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (0040) 336.130.242
Fax: (0040) 336.130.242
Web page: http://www.feaa.ugal.ro
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Eduard IONESCU & Riana Iren RADU, 2010. "The International Financial and Macro-Economic Frame of the Current Economic Crisis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 53-60.
- William R. Eadington, 2007. "Gambling Policy in the European Union: Monopolies, Market Access, Economic Rents, and Competitive Pressures among Gaming Sectors in the Member States," Working Papers 07-005, University of Nevada, Reno, Department of Economics;University of Nevada, Reno , Department of Resource Economics.
- Florentina MOISESCU & Iuliana MIHAI, 2009. "Acknowledging and Accounting for Employee Benefits," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 131-140.
- Nicoleta BARBUTA-MISU, 2011. "A Review of Factors for Tax Compliance," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 69-76.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2013:i:1:p:67-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gianina Mihai)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.