IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwi/minnov/v3y2025i1p1-15.html

Gaining the Initiative: User Entrepreneurial Process Driven by Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Weiren Cen

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China)

Abstract

With the development of Internet technology and the prosperity of platform economy, the phenomenon that users undertake innovative and entrepreneurial activities keeps emerging. User innovation and entrepreneurship are very important research streams in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship. User entrepreneurship is exactly opposite to traditional entrepreneurship. However, the existing research has not fully and deeply revealed the process mechanism of user entrepreneurship driven by user innovation, and lacks a holistic overview. Address to this, this study summarizes the connotation and classification of the entrepreneurial process driven by user innovation on the basis of systematically review the literature, then applys multiple theories to interpret the micro-process of entrepreneurship driven by user innovation, refines the research focus of "antecedent-process-result" variables, and finally constructs a holistic research framework of entrepreneurial process driven by user innovation. The research attempts to thoroughly reveal the entrepreneurial process mechanism driven by user innovation, and puts forward specific suggestions for future research in this field. The conclusion and prospect of the study are helpful to promote the entrepreneurial research driven by user innovation, and at the same time provide reference for making the relevant entrepreneurial policies to promote the transition of user innovators to user entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiren Cen, 2025. "Gaining the Initiative: User Entrepreneurial Process Driven by Innovation," Management & Innovation, Berger Science Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, ‌February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwi:minnov:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.61187/mi.v3i1.166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bergersci.com/index.php/mi/article/view/166/55
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bergersci.com/index.php/mi/article/view/166
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.61187/mi.v3i1.166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Bettinelli, Cristina & Andreini, Daniela & Bergamaschi, Mara, 2018. "Consumer entrepreneurship and cultural innovation: The case of GinO12," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 431-442.
    2. Agarwal, Rajshree & Shah, Sonali K., 2014. "Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1109-1133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smita Srivastava & Stephanie B. Escudero & Pyayt P. Oo, 2026. "Passive Consumer to Active Creator: Review of Drivers, Processes, and Outcomes of User Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 50(1), pages 81-114, January.
    2. Paolo Aversa & Santi Furnari & Mark Jenkins, 2022. "The Primordial Soup: Exploring the Emotional Microfoundations of Cluster Genesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1340-1371, July.
    3. Xin Gao, 2025. "Research on the Growth Mechanism of Entrepreneurship by Knowledge Coupling Based on Multi-agent Interaction," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10639-10661, June.
    4. Peter Zwan & Roy Thurik & Ingrid Verheul & Jolanda Hessels, 2016. "Erratum to: Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 297-297, December.
    5. K. Poehlmann & R. Helm & O. Mauroner & J. Auburger, 2021. "Corporate spin-offs’ success factors: management lessons from a comparative empirical analysis with research-based spin-offs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1767-1796, August.
    6. Pamela Adams & Roberto Fontana & Franco Malerba, 2022. "Knowledge resources and the acquisition of spinouts," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(2), pages 277-313, June.
    7. Tommaso Minola & Davide Hahn & Lucio Cassia, 2021. "The relationship between origin and performance of innovative start-ups: the role of technological knowledge at founding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 553-569, February.
    8. Fini, Riccardo & Perkmann, Markus & Kenney, Martin & Maki, Kanetaka M., 2023. "Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the University of California system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    9. Marco Ferretti & Salvatore Ferri & Raffaele Fiorentino & Adele Parmentola & Alessandro Sapio, 2019. "Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 153-173, January.
    10. Nemlioglu, Ilayda & Mallick, Sushanta K., 2020. "Do innovation-intensive firms mitigate their valuation uncertainty during bad times?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 913-940.
    11. Kokoreva, Maria S. (Кокорева, Мария) & Stepanova, Anastasia N. (Степанова, Анастасия) & Karnoukhova, Elena V. (Карноухова, Елена), 2016. "What We Do not Know about the Ownership Structure of the Largest U.S. Companies? [Чего Мы Не Знаем О Структуре Собственности Крупнейших Компаний Сша?]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 36-59, December.
    12. Würmseher, Martin, 2017. "To each his own: Matching different entrepreneurial models to the academic scientist's individual needs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-17.
    13. Pamela Adams & Roberto Fontana & Franco Malerba, 2016. "User-Industry Spinouts: Downstream Industry Knowledge as a Source of New Firm Entry and Survival," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 18-35, February.
    14. Sun, Lan & Liu, Shaobo & Ouyang, Ruolan & Zhao, Yang, 2024. "Innovation at the helm: Decoding founder-manager influence in Chinese family firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Chila, Vilma, 2021. "Knowledge dynamics in employee entrepreneurship : Implications for parents and offspring," Other publications TiSEM a1f5d18c-783b-4af6-8414-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Audretsch, David & Colombelli, Alessandra & Grilli, Luca & Minola, Tommaso & Rasmussen, Einar, 2020. "Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    17. Mariko Sakakibara & Natarajan Balasubramanian, 2020. "Human capital, parent size, and the destination industry of spinouts," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 815-840, May.
    18. Jeong-min Ryu & Sewon Park & Yoonseo Park & Jeongwon Park & Munjae Lee, 2021. "Innovative Culture and Firm Performance of Medical Device Companies: Mediating Effects of Investment in Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Mahka Moeen & Will Mitchell, 2020. "How do pre‐entrants to the industry incubation stage choose between alliances and acquisitions for technical capabilities and specialized complementary assets?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1450-1489, August.
    20. Chong Yu & Masatoshi Kato, 2024. "Does user entrepreneurship matter for start-up financing? Evidence from Japan," Discussion Paper Series 275, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwi:minnov:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Berger Science Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.bergersci.com/index.php/mi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.