IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v16y2010i02p235-249_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance culture: A conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Interligi, Lisa

Abstract

Regulatory reforms and changing community expectations about organizational behaviour have increased the emphasis on the role of culture in organizational compliance. This conceptual paper proposes a framework that captures the complexities of the relationship between compliance and culture by drawing from two theories relevant to organizational culture: Neo-Institutional Theory and the Competing Values Model. By integrating elements of these theories, three core dimensions of compliance culture are identified: legitimacy, permeability and control. These core dimensions provide for a pluralist approach to theorising around compliance culture. In addition to its theoretical contribution, the paper concludes that there may be practical utility in linking organizational compliance outcomes with performance on the three core dimensions. It is also suggested that compliance culture profiles using these dimensions may be used to predict how organisations might need to respond to regulatory reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Interligi, Lisa, 2010. "Compliance culture: A conceptual framework," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:16:y:2010:i:02:p:235-249_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367200002157/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Van Rooij & Adam Fine, 2018. "Toxic Corporate Culture: Assessing Organizational Processes of Deviancy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Lonneke Dubbelt & Janneke Oostrom & Annemarie Hiemstra & Joost Modderman, 2015. "Validation of a Digital Work Simulation to Assess Machiavellianism and Compliant Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 619-637, September.
    3. Wendy Mason Burdon & Mohamed Karim Sorour, 2020. "Institutional Theory and Evolution of ‘A Legitimate’ Compliance Culture: The Case of the UK Financial Service Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 47-80, February.
    4. Mohammad A. Rickaby & Jacqueline Glass & Scott Fernie, 2020. "Conceptualizing the Relationship between Personal Values and Sustainability—A TMO Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Paagman, Arnaud & Tate, Mary & Furtmueller, Elfi & de Bloom, Jessica, 2015. "An integrative literature review and empirical validation of motives for introducing shared services in government organizations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 110-123.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:16:y:2010:i:02:p:235-249_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.