IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v11y1991i02p187-206_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics

Author

Listed:
  • May, Peter J.

Abstract

One of the emerging areas in the public policy literature concerns new modes of thought about the construction and analysis of public policy. This article extends notions about politics within the ‘policy design’ literature by considering the implications of different political environments for policy design and implementation. Two different political environments – policies with and without publics – that form ends of a continuum of policy publics are discussed. A contrast is drawn between these two polar political environments with respect to differing policy design and implementation challenges, as well as with respect to differing opportunities for policy learning.

Suggested Citation

  • May, Peter J., 1991. "Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 187-206, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:11:y:1991:i:02:p:187-206_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X0000619X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Zheng & Xiaohua Zheng, 2022. "Does Public Participation Matter to Planning? Urban Sculpture Reception in the Context of Elite-Led Planning in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Christian Adam & Yves Steinebach & Christoph Knill, 2018. "Neglected challenges to evidence-based policy-making: the problem of policy accumulation," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 269-290, September.
    3. Moshe Maor, 2020. "Policy over- and under-design: an information quality perspective," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 395-411, September.
    4. Markus Hinterleitner & David Kaufmann & Eva Thomann, 2022. "The fit between regulatory instruments and targets: Regulating the economic integration of migrants," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 892-909, July.
    5. Kelsey D. Meagher, 2022. "Policy responses to foodborne disease outbreaks in the United States and Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 233-248, March.
    6. Lily Hsueh, 2020. "Expanding the multiple streams framework to explain the formation of diverse voluntary programs: evidence from US toxic chemical use policy," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 111-123, June.
    7. Janne Mende, 2023. "Public Interests and the Legitimation of Global Governance Actors," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 109-119.
    8. Hongying Wang, 2021. "Regime Complexity and Complex Foreign Policy: China in International Development Finance Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 69-79, May.
    9. Stafford, Sarah L., 2014. "Will additional federal enforcement improve the performance of pipelines in the U.S.?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 137-146.
    10. Leanne Giordono & Hilary Boudet & Alexander Gard-Murray, 2020. "Local adaptation policy responses to extreme weather events," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 609-636, December.
    11. Irene Pluchinotta & Akin O. Kazakçi & Raffaele Giordano & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2019. "Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 341-375, April.
    12. Heather Millar, 2020. "Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 765-796, November.
    13. Daniel Buschmann & Karin Koziol & Thomas Bausch & Steurer Reinhard, 2022. "Adaptation to climate change in small German municipalities: Sparse knowledge and weak adaptive capacities," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(4), pages 377-392, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jnlpup:v:11:y:1991:i:02:p:187-206_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pup .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.