IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v11y2001i01p177-193_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan, Lori Verstegen
  • Buchholtz, Ann K.

Abstract

Shareholders’ relationship to the firm is a central theme in corporate governance, yet the investors’ perspective has been virtually ignored in governance research. This paper attempts to explain the previously unexplored role of trust in the investor decision-making process. The proposed model suggests that trust acts as the antecedent of the risk variable in existing investor decision-making models. Stock ownership involves both financial and ethical risk, which by definition requires some level of implicit trust in management and the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan, Lori Verstegen & Buchholtz, Ann K., 2001. "Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 177-193, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:11:y:2001:i:01:p:177-193_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00001287/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lori Verstegen Ryan, 2006. "Foundation and Form of the Field of Business Ethics," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Spring 20), pages 34-49.
    2. Livia Levine, 2019. "Digital Trust and Cooperation with an Integrative Digital Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 393-407, December.
    3. Anass YACHOULTI & Abdellah HOUSSAINI, 2018. "impact of supply chain integration on corporate financial performance," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 78-90, June.
    4. Jonathan A. Batten & Igor LonČarski & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2022. "Financial Market Manipulation, Whistleblowing, and the Common Good: Evidence from the LIBOR Scandal," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(1), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Erik Rietschoten & Koen Bommel, 2023. "A Critique of Utilitarian Trust: The Case of the Dutch Insurance Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1011-1028, April.
    6. Clark-Murphy, Marilyn & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2004. "What individual investors value: Some Australian evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 539-555, August.
    7. Omotuyole Isiaka Ambali & Toritseju Begho, 2021. "Examining the relationship between farmers' perceived trust and investment preferences," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), pages 1290-1303, November.
    8. Vohra, Shalini & Davies, Gary, 2020. "Investor regret, share performance and the role of corporate agreeableness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 306-315.
    9. Anass YACHOULTI & Abdellah HOUSSAINI, 2018. "The impact of supply chain integration on corporate financial performance," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 78-90, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:11:y:2001:i:01:p:177-193_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.