IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v13y2019i02p378-399_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate credibility modelling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioural data

Author

Listed:
  • Denuit, Michel
  • Guillen, Montserrat
  • Trufin, Julien

Abstract

Pay-how-you-drive (PHYD) or usage-based (UB) systems for automobile insurance provide actuaries with behavioural risk factors, such as the time of the day, average speeds and other driving habits. These data are collected while the contract is in force with the help of telematic devices installed in the vehicle. They thus fall in the category of a posteriori information that becomes available after contract initiation. For this reason, they must be included in the actuarial pricing by means of credibility updating mechanisms instead of being incorporated in the score as ordinary a priori observable features. This paper proposes the use of multivariate mixed models to describe the joint dynamics of telematics data and claim frequencies. Future premiums, incorporating past experience can then be determined using the predictive distribution of claim characteristics given past history. This approach allows the actuary to deal with the variety of situations encountered in insurance practice, ranging from new drivers without telematics record to contracts with different seniority and drivers using their vehicle to different extent, generating varied volumes of telematics data.

Suggested Citation

  • Denuit, Michel & Guillen, Montserrat & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Multivariate credibility modelling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioural data," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 378-399, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:13:y:2019:i:02:p:378-399_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499518000349/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zezhun Chen & Angelos Dassios & George Tzougas, 2022. "EM Estimation for the Bivariate Mixed Exponential Regression Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Ana M. Pérez‐Marín, 2021. "Near‐miss telematics in motor insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(3), pages 569-589, September.
    3. Dhiti Osatakul & Xueyuan Wu, 2021. "Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Michel Denuit & Yang Lu, 2021. "Wishart‐gamma random effects models with applications to nonlife insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-481, June.
    5. Jiamin Yu, 2022. "Will claim history become a deprecated rating factor? An optimal design method for the real-time road risk model," Papers 2204.11585, arXiv.org.
    6. Chen, Zezhun & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2022. "EM estimation for the bivariate mixed exponential regression model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115132, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Jean-Philippe Boucher & Roxane Turcotte, 2020. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Distance Driven on the Probability of Car Accidents," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Tzougas, George & di Cerchiara, Alice Pignatelli, 2021. "Bivariate mixed Poisson regression models with varying dispersion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114327, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Nemanja Milanović & Miloš Milosavljević & Slađana Benković & Dušan Starčević & Željko Spasenić, 2020. "An Acceptance Approach for Novel Technologies in Car Insurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Tzougas, George & Makariou, Despoina, 2022. "The multivariate Poisson-Generalized Inverse Gaussian claim count regression model with varying dispersion and shape parameters," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117197, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Alicja Wolny-Dominiak & Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "The Measures of Accuracy of Claim Frequency Credibility Predictor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    12. George Tzougas & Despoina Makariou, 2022. "The multivariate Poisson‐Generalized Inverse Gaussian claim count regression model with varying dispersion and shape parameters," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(4), pages 401-417, December.
    13. Zezhun Chen & Angelos Dassios & George Tzougas, 2023. "Multivariate mixed Poisson Generalized Inverse Gaussian INAR(1) regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 955-977, June.
    14. Chen, Zezhun Chen & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2023. "EM estimation for bivariate mixed poisson INAR(1) claim count regression models with correlated random effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118826, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Simon, Pierre-Alexandre & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2023. "Bivariate Poisson credibility model and bonus-malus scale for claim and near-claim events," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    16. Omid Ghaffarpasand & Mark Burke & Louisa K. Osei & Helen Ursell & Sam Chapman & Francis D. Pope, 2022. "Vehicle Telematics for Safer, Cleaner and More Sustainable Urban Transport: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Gao, Guangyuan & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Yang, Hanfang, 2019. "Evaluation of driving risk at different speeds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 108-119.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:13:y:2019:i:02:p:378-399_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.