IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v14y2023i1p40-49.html

Development of lottery business and economic justification of its monopolisation by the state

Author

Listed:
  • Ermeka Lailieva

Abstract

The research relevance is determined by the fact that, despite the emergence of more modern gambling, millions of people around the world participate in lotteries every year, and this number is steadily growing. The study aims to assess the prospects for the development of the lottery business in the context of the state monopoly on this industry, as well as to consider possible risks for the economy. The structural-functional method was used as a basis for studying the place of the lottery business in the economic system on the example of different countries; the historical method addressed the peculiarities of the origin of lotteries in the world. The study conducted a comprehensive study of the stages of formation of modern models of lottery activity in the leading countries of the world, such as the USA, Great Britain and China. The reasons for the emergence of lotteries, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the role of government agencies in regulating this activity were investigated. In particular, the study analysed the models of a complete ban, a free market and a state monopoly, as well as the impact of lotteries on the economy and society. The study showed that the high level of profitability of the lottery business allows organisers to make stable contributions to the state budget and charitable organisations, solving social and humanitarian problems. The results of the study determined the optimal model of the lottery business, formulated the prospects for the development of this type of activity at the present stage, and assessed the role of the state authorities in this process. The study materials can be used by public authorities engaged in reforming the legislative framework in the field of gambling

Suggested Citation

  • Ermeka Lailieva, 2023. "Development of lottery business and economic justification of its monopolisation by the state," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 14(1), pages 40-49, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:40-49
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62763/cb/1.2024.40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_14_1_2024_130978_11-09-2024_09-36-40-49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62763/cb/1.2024.40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Del Viva, Luca & Kasanen, Eero & Saunders, Anthony & Trigeorgis, Lenos, 2021. "US government TARP bailout and bank lottery behavior," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Martijn J. Burger & Martijn Hendriks & Emma Pleeging & Jan C. Ours, 2020. "The joy of lottery play: evidence from a field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1235-1256, December.
    3. Alejandro Díaz & Levi Pérez, 2021. "Setting The Odds Of Winning The Jackpot: On The Economics Of (Re) Designing Lottery Games," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(1), pages 168-177, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Maximilian Stetzka & Stefan Winter, 2023. "How rational is gambling?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1432-1488, September.
    2. Ruut Veenhoven & Felicia Chiperi & Xin Kang & Martijn Burger, 2021. "Happiness and Consumption: A Research Synthesis Using an Online Finding Archive* â€," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    3. Deiana, C & Dragone, D & Giua, L, 2024. "Addictive Consumption, Imperfect Substitutes and Self Control: A Model and an Application to Slot Machines," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 24/21, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Laetitia Dillenseger & Claire Mouminoux, 2024. "The Virtuous Loop Between Happiness and Pro-Environmental Behaviors," Working Papers of BETA 2024-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Couture, Cody & Cross, Jeffrey & Wu, Stephen, 2024. "Impact of sports gambling on mental health," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Liu, Qiang & Mao, Yidan & Zhang, Yefeng & Xiong, Zhengling, 2025. "Targeted fiscal policy and corporate investment: Evidence from the special bonds in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Akyildirim, Erdinc & Corbet, Shaen & Ongena, Steven & Staunton, David, 2025. "Understanding reputational risks: The impact of ESG events on European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Can Xu & Andreas Steiner & Jakob de Haan, 2023. "Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Encourage Gambling? Evidence from the Chinese Welfare Lottery Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 10241, CESifo.
    9. Stefano Bonini & Ali Taatian, 2023. "Dual holding and bank risk," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 735-763, November.
    10. Sivá, Soňa, 2025. "The effects of government bailouts on bank performance in the EU," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Xin Hong & Yang Hu & Wanting Zhang, 2022. "Share pledge risk and government bailout fund," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(5), pages 4831-4848, December.
    12. Álvaro Muñiz & Levi Pérez, 2023. "The market for EuroMillions: jackpot sharing and implicit transfer of funds among countries," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(3), pages 817-833, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:40-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.