IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v11y2021i1p29-34.html

Digitalization as a tool to support innovation: A European perspective

Author

Listed:
  • А. Bobenič Hintošová
  • М. Bruothová

Abstract

Implementation of information and communication technologies has changed several aspects of the economy including innovation processes and their outputs. It is generally stated that the use of information and communication technologies enhances innovation. However, the process of digitalization, especially in transforming economies, is approximately in the middle of its formation and visible effects on innovation may occur only with more developed stages of digitalization. Hence, the aim of the present paper is to investigate the relationship between the digital transformation of the economy and the innovation performance at the level of the European Union member states. For comparison purposes the European countries are divided into the particular groups according to their level of digitalization and innovation performance. The results of analysis show positive interdependence between the Summary Innovation Index and the Digital Economy and Society Index. We take into account three-year values of both indexes with one-year lag in the case of the second one, since we expect a time shift in the innovation performance induced by the development of the digital economy and society. Moreover, the digital development – innovation matrix showed that the most digitalized European countries are the most innovative ones, a vice versa. The majority of the “old” European Union member states belong to the group of digitalized innovators, with relatively high level of digitalization associated with superior innovation performance. On the other hand, for the most of the “new” European Union member states, lower levels of digitalization are associated with below-average innovation performance. Only some exemptions were detected in this regard. Hence, digitalization can be considered as a tool to foster innovation

Suggested Citation

  • А. Bobenič Hintošová & М. Bruothová, 2021. "Digitalization as a tool to support innovation: A European perspective," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 11(1), pages 29-34, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:29-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Economic_Forum_Vol_11_No_1-29-34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maryann Feldman, 1999. "The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1-2), pages 5-25.
    2. Karol J. Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2017. "Digitization of heritage collections as indicator of innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 227-246, April.
    3. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    4. Matthew A. Zook, 2002. "Grounded capital: venture financing and the geography of the Internet industry, 1994--2000," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 151-177, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuxin & Zhou, Junting & Zhang, Rui, 2025. "Market accessibility, agglomeration, and spatial location of digital enterprises," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Obschonka, Martin & Tavassoli, Sam & Rentfrow, P. Jason & Potter, Jeff & Gosling, Samuel D., 2023. "Innovation and inter-city knowledge spillovers: Social, geographical, and technological connectedness and psychological openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    3. Yang, Bofei & Zhu, Shengjun, 2022. "Public funds in high-tech industries: A blessing or a curse," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Zaheer, Hasnain & Breyer, Yvonne & Dumay, John, 2019. "Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Magnus Schückes & Tobias Gutmann, 2021. "Why do startups pursue initial coin offerings (ICOs)? The role of economic drivers and social identity on funding choice," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1027-1052, August.
    6. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Jin, Laiqun & Dai, Jiaying & Jiang, Weijie & Cao, Kairui, 2023. "Digital finance and misallocation of resources among firms: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Isaksson, Olov H.D. & Simeth, Markus & Seifert, Ralf W., 2016. "Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 699-706.
    9. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    10. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    11. Hadi Hussain & Wen Jun & Magdalena Radulescu, 2025. "Innovation Performance in the Digital Divide Context: Nexus of Digital Infrastructure, Digital Innovation, and E-knowledge," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3772-3792, March.
    12. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
    13. Agrawal, Ajay & Cockburn, Iain, 2003. "The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(9), pages 1227-1253, November.
    14. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    15. Liuwu Chen & Guimei Zhang, 2024. "Research on the impact of digital financial inclusion and environmental regulation on industrial structure upgrading-based on spatial Durbin model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Muhamed Kudic & Wilfried Ehrenfeld & Toralf Pusch, 2015. "On the trail of core–periphery patterns in innovation networks: measurements and new empirical findings from the German laser industry," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(1), pages 187-220, October.
    17. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    18. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Martin Andersson & Börje Johansson, 2008. "Innovation Ideas and Regional Characteristics: Product Innovations and Export Entrepreneurship by Firms in Swedish Regions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 193-224, June.
    20. Qiwei Zhou & Shuang Cheng & Feiqiang Fu & Jingmin Zhang & Yingxu Jiang, 2025. "Enterprise digital transformation as a double-edged sword for employees: an investigation based on the Job Demands-Resources model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:29-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.