IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v11y2021i1p134-141.html

Informative providing of strategic choice

Author

Listed:
  • Liubov Lipych
  • Oksana Khilukha
  • Myroslаvа Kushnіr

Abstract

An important task of management is to create a system of information support. It allows you to collect and process internal and external information necessary to make informed strategic choices regarding the insurance of strategic development. The purpose of the article is to review modern approaches to defining the essence of the concept of information support and identification of the main aspects of the formation of an effective system of information support for the process of strategic choice of the enterprise. The article states that in terms of information support of strategic choice, information support is to provide information in the manner prescribed by law, in the process of which on the basis of information systems and using principles, methods, techniques, rules, schemes and algorithms its collection, processing, accumulation, storage, transfer and use in an amount sufficient to make decisions optimal for the enterprise. Forms of information support at all stages of strategic choice with indication of specific tools are substantiated. The model of the strategic selection process shows that information support allows you to quickly import data related to the detection of problems coming from different sources. It has been proven that with the help of IT systems that support strategic choice, it is possible to record and process large amounts of data generated in all functional structures of the enterprise. Access to hidden information, often difficult to access, is a determining condition for making rational decisions about enterprise development. The set of received information (both secondary and primary) is a knowledge base. The generated knowledge determines the behavior of the enterprise. Trust in information is transformed into the quality of knowledge, and the latter into the accuracy of strategic decisions, which is reflected in the achieved economic results of the enterprise. Emphasis is placed on the fact that strategists should be provided with information systems focused on the perception and interpretation of weak signals. This is the information basis of the strategic selection process. By receiving information that reduces uncertainty, the manager has the opportunity to make rational decisions

Suggested Citation

  • Liubov Lipych & Oksana Khilukha & Myroslаvа Kushnіr, 2021. "Informative providing of strategic choice," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 11(1), pages 134-141, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:134-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Economic_Forum_Vol_11_No_1-134-141.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenworthy, Thomas P. & Verbeke, Alain, 2015. "The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 179-190.
    2. Alain Verbeke & Vincent Tung, 2013. "The Future of Stakeholder Management Theory: A Temporal Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 529-543, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herman Aguinis & Kelly P. Gabriel, 2022. "International business studies: Are we really so uniquely complex?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2023-2036, December.
    2. I. Girerd-Potin & S. Jimenez-Garces & Pascal Louvet, 2014. "Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors?," Post-Print halshs-01337706, HAL.
    3. O. C. Ferrell & Victoria L. Crittenden & Linda Ferrell & William F. Crittenden, 2013. "Theoretical development in ethical marketing decision making," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(2), pages 51-60, June.
    4. Satish Nambisan & Yadong Luo, 2021. "Toward a loose coupling view of digital globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1646-1663, October.
    5. Kenworthy, Thomas P. & Sparks, John R., 2016. "A scientific realism perspective on scientific progress in marketing: An analysis of theory testing in marketing's major journals," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 466-474.
    6. Hiney, Noel & Efthymiou, Marina & Morgenroth, Edgar, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on Irish airport stakeholder relationships," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. J. Rincón-Moreno & M. Ormazábal & C. Jaca, 2022. "Stakeholder Perspectives in Transitioning to a Local Circular Economy: a Case Study in Spain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 693-711, June.
    8. Abd Alwahed Dagestani & Ibrahim Alnafrah & Luboš Smutka & Yuriy Bilan & Pengyu Chen, 2025. "Greenwashing and stakeholder theory in China: an empirical evidence of corporate social responsibility and firms performance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21683-21708, September.
    9. Kenworthy, Thomas P. & Verbeke, Alain, 2015. "The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 179-190.
    10. Rodriguez Serna, Lil & Nakandala, Dilupa & Bowyer, Dorothea, 2022. "Stakeholder identification and prioritization: The attribute of dependency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 444-455.
    11. Payam Hanafizadeh & Maryam Alipour, 2025. "Theory borrowing in emerging technology-oriented research contexts: on the example of blockchain technology," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 105-155, January.
    12. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 59-74, September.
    13. Sefa Hayibor & Colleen Collins, 2016. "Motivators of Mobilization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 351-374, December.
    14. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Viassone, Milena & Migliano, Giuseppe, 2020. "Does the stakeholder engagement result in new drinks? Evidence from family owned SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 185-194.
    15. Grazia D. Santangelo & Alain Verbeke, 2022. "Actionable guidelines to improve ‘theory-related’ contributions to international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1843-1855, December.
    16. Kazunori Kobayashi & Gabriel Eweje & David Tappin, 2024. "Changing overwork culture: Stakeholder management for employee wellbeing and social sustainability in large Japanese companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 5032-5048, September.
    17. Kull, Alexander J. & Mena, Jeannette A. & Korschun, Daniel, 2016. "A resource-based view of stakeholder marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5553-5560.
    18. Muhammad Rafiq & XingPing Zhang & Jiahai Yuan & Shumaila Naz & Saif Maqbool, 2020. "Impact of a Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System Tool to Improve Sustainable Development: Measuring the Mediation of Organizational Performance through PLS-Smart," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Stephen T. Homer, 2022. "Perceived corporate citizenship: a scale development and validation study adopting a bottom-up approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1435-1461, June.
    20. Alain Verbeke & Mary Ann Glinow & Yadong Luo, 2017. "Becoming a great reviewer: Four actionable guidelines," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(1), pages 1-9, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:134-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.