IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a10172.html

Multiple Geographies of Commons‐Based Peer Production

Author

Listed:
  • Danai Liodaki

    (Department Regional Geographies of Europe, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography, Germany / Graduate School Global and Area Studies, University of Leipzig, Germany / Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, UK)

  • Markus Sattler

    (Department Regional Geographies of Europe, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography, Germany / Graduate School Global and Area Studies, University of Leipzig, Germany)

  • Vangelis Papadimitropoulos

    (Department of Economic and Regional Development, Panteion University, Greece)

  • Thilo Lang

    (Department Regional Geographies of Europe, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography, Germany)

Abstract

This article engages from a geographical perspective with commons‐based peer production (CBPP), an emerging socio‐economic activity based on sharing resources and outputs among individuals who collaborate in a non‐hierarchical manner. CBPP was initially used to describe the intangible production of knowledge and information through online cooperation. More recently, this practice grew to include other sectors of production, like hardware development, manufacturing, or agriculture, and has spread in various geographical settings, connecting Global North and Global South, rural and urban places, and digital and physical collaborations. The combination of intangible and tangible production has been described through the concept of cosmolocalism and the principle of “design global, manufacture local,” and has been analyzed through practices observed in communal spaces, like makerspaces. While CBPP has been discussed as a more sustainable and convivial mode of production in social science literature, the phenomenon remains under‐researched from a geographical perspective. This article aims to contribute to the CBPP literature and current geographical debates by exploring this emerging activity from a geographical lens. By using “multiple geographies” as a methodological tool, we argue that geographical approaches can help CBPP engage more with the materiality of production, as well as identify, problematize, and potentially address power relations on multiple scales. Likewise, the CBPP literature can contribute to geographical literature that is concerned about practices for more liveable worlds.

Suggested Citation

  • Danai Liodaki & Markus Sattler & Vangelis Papadimitropoulos & Thilo Lang, 2025. "Multiple Geographies of Commons‐Based Peer Production," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10172
    DOI: 10.17645/up.10172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/10172
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.10172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Rikap & Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 2022. "Big tech, knowledge predation and the implications for development," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 389-416, September.
    2. Joshua Pearce, 2012. "The case for open source appropriate technology," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 425-431, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    3. Alessio Terzi & Monika Sherwood & Aneil Singh, 2023. "European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 842-857.
    4. Alexandra Köves & Tamás Veress & Judit Gáspár & Réka Matolay, 2021. "Conceptualizing Cuvée Organizations: Characteristics Leading towards Sustainable Decision-Making Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Domenico Delli Gatti & Roberta Terranova & Enrico Maria Turco, 2024. "Industrial Policy in Times of Market Power," CESifo Working Paper Series 11544, CESifo.
    6. Coveri Andrea & Cozza Claudio & Guarascio Dario, 2025. "Big Tech and the US Digital-Military-Industrial Complex," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 60(2), pages 81-87.
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:ruyp3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special4:p:658-671 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Luminița PISTOL & Rocsana BUCEA-MANEA-ȚONIȘ, 2014. "Model of Innovation through Information Network Sharing," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 1(1), pages 230-237, December.
    10. Mendonça, Sandro & Silva, Eduardo & Damásio, Bruno, 2025. "The knowledge base of Big Tech: Research as a source of informational leadership by the dominant US digital platforms," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    11. Obydenkova, Svetlana V. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2016. "Technical viability of mobile solar photovoltaic systems for indigenous nomadic communities in northern latitudes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 253-267.
    12. Katrin Hussinger & Lorenzo Palladini, 2024. "Information accessibility and knowledge creation: the impact of Google’s withdrawal from China on scientific research," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 753-783, July.
    13. I. Zelenika & J. Pearce, 2014. "Innovation through collaboration: scaling up solutions for sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1299-1316, December.
    14. Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Gatot Yudoko & Kiyoshi Dowaki & Akbar Adhiutama, 2013. "Design Methodology for Appropriate Technology: Engineering as if People Mattered," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-44, August.
    15. Andre Laplume & Gerald C Anzalone & Joshua Pearce, 2016. "Open-source, self-replicating 3-D printer factory for small-business manufacturing," Post-Print hal-02113502, HAL.
    16. repec:plo:pone00:0059840 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:osf:socarx:ub92z_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Artur Kwasek & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Damian Kocot & Marek Martin & Maria Kocot, 2021. "A Study on the Determinants of Consumer Online Purchasing Behaviour," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 658-671.
    19. Dahlke, Johannes & Beck, Mathias & Kinne, Jan & Lenz, David & Dehghan, Robert & Wörter, Martin & Ebersberger, Bernd, 2024. "Epidemic effects in the diffusion of emerging digital technologies: evidence from artificial intelligence adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    20. Paraná, Edemilson, 2024. "AI as financial infrastructure?," SocArXiv ub92z, Center for Open Science.
    21. Jérémy Bonvoisin & Robert Mies & Jean-François Boujut, 2021. "Seven observations and research questions about Open Design and Open Source Hardware," Post-Print hal-03395460, HAL.
    22. Artur Kwasek & Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Maria Kocot & Agnieszka Rzepka & Damian Kocot & Hubert Gąsiński & Dariusz Prokopowicz, 2023. "Energy Saving Practices in the IT Area as a Factor of Sustainable Development of the Organization: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    23. Rahul A Sirohi, 2024. "Corporate power and the rise of intangibles: A study of Indian firms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 865-882, May.
    24. Chiara Colombi & Erminia D’Itria, 2023. "Fashion Digital Transformation: Innovating Business Models toward Circular Economy and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:10172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.