IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luc/wpaper/24-05.html

Information accessibility and knowledge creation: impact of Google’s withdrawal from China on scientific research

Author

Listed:
  • Katrin Hussinger

    (DEM, Université du Luxembourg)

  • Lorenzo Palladini

    (DEM, Université du Luxembourg)

Abstract

How important is Google for scientific research? This paper exploits the exogenous shock represented by Google’s sudden withdrawal of its services from mainland China to assess the importance of access to information for the knowledge production function of scientific scholars in the field of economics. For economists, a type of scholar with a simple knowledge production function, results from difference-in-difference analyses, which compare their scientific output to scholars located in the neighboring regions, show that the scientific productivity declines by about 28% in volume and 30% in terms of citations. These results are consistent with the view that information accessibility is an important driver of scientific progress. Considering that the negative effect of the shock is stronger for top scholars located in China, Google’s sudden exit bears the risk that researchers lose touch with the research frontier and persistently lag behind their foreign peers.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrin Hussinger & Lorenzo Palladini, 2024. "Information accessibility and knowledge creation: impact of Google’s withdrawal from China on scientific research," DEM Discussion Paper Series 24-05, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:24-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10993/61862
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elodie Carpentier & Alexander Cuntz & Alessio Muscarnera & Julio Raffo, 2025. "Digital Access to Knowledge and Women in Science," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 88, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    2. Michael E. Rose & Stefano H. Baruffaldi, 2025. "Finding Doppelgängers in Scopus: how to build scientists control groups using sosia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 3013-3028, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:24-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Legrand The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Marina Legrand to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crcrplu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.