IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v9y2021i2p222-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Leave Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja Blum

    (Institute of Political Science, University of Hagen, Germany)

  • Ivana Dobrotić

    (Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, UK / Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

This thematic issue aims to deepen the theoretical as well as empirical knowledge on the inclusiveness of social rights, focussing on the revelatory case of parenting‐related leave policies. This editorial defines (leave) inclusiveness and discusses extant research on varying entitlements and eligibility criteria in the field of parenting leaves. It summarises the conceptual, methodological, and empirical contributions made by the articles in the thematic issue and closes with a research outlook.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja Blum & Ivana Dobrotić, 2021. "The Inclusiveness of Social Rights: The Case of Leave Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 222-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:222-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4523
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keonhi Son & Tobias Böger, 2021. "The Inclusiveness of Maternity Leave Rights over 120 Years and across Five Continents," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 275-287.
    2. Adeline Otto & Alzbeta Bártová & Wim Van Lancker, 2021. "Measuring the Generosity of Parental Leave Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 238-249.
    3. Mikael Nygård & Ann-Zofie Duvander, 2021. "Social Inclusion or Gender Equality? Political Discourses on Parental Leave in Finland and Sweden," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 300-312.
    4. Leen Marynissen & Jonas Wood & Karel Neels, 2021. "Mothers and Parental Leave in Belgium: Social Inequalities in Eligibility and Uptake," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 325-337.
    5. Monica Budowski & Daniel Künzler, 2020. "Universalism in Social Policies: A Multidimensional Concept, Policy Idea or Process," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 86-89.
    6. Alison Koslowski, 2021. "Capturing the Gender Gap in the Scope of Parenting Related Leave Policies Across Nations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 250-261.
    7. Gillian Whitehouse & Hideki Nakazato, 2021. "Dimensions of Social Equality in Paid Parental Leave Policy Design: Comparing Australia and Japan," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 288-299.
    8. Anna Kurowska, 2021. "The Contextualized Inclusiveness of Parental Leave Benefits," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 262-274.
    9. Merve Uzunalioglu & Marie Valentova & Margaret O'Brien & Anne-Sophie Genevois, 2021. "When Does Expanded Eligibility Translate into Increased Take-Up? An Examination of Parental Leave Policy in Luxembourg," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 350-363.
    10. Tine Rostgaard & Anders Ejrnæs, 2021. "How Different Parental Leave Schemes Create Different Take-Up Patterns: Denmark in Nordic Comparison," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 313-324.
    11. Andrea Doucet, 2021. "Socially Inclusive Parenting Leaves and Parental Benefit Entitlements: Rethinking Care and Work Binaries," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 227-237.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alzbeta Bartova & Adeline Otto & Wim Van Lancker, 2022. "Making Parental Leave Policies Work for Single Mothers: Lessons from Europe," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 129-148, July.
    2. Allan Puur & Sanan Abdullayev & Martin Klesment & Mark Gortfelder, 2023. "Parental Leave and Fertility: Individual-Level Responses in the Tempo and Quantum of Second and Third Births," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Van Lancker, Wim & Zagel, Hannah, 2022. "Family policy research in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 34-49.
    4. Dobrotic, Ivana & Arnalds, Ásdís Aðalbjörg & Dimitrova, Elitsa & Son, Keonhi & Engeman, Cassandra & Valentova, Marie & Mercan, Murat A. & Ilieva, Kalina & Makay, Zsuzsanna & Reimer, Thordis, 2023. "Parenting leave policy data gaps: a comparative critical analysis," SocArXiv 8g25k, Center for Open Science.
    5. Jonas Wood & Leen Marynissen & Jessica Nisén & Peter Fallesen & Karel Neels & Alessandra Trimarchi & Lars Dommermuth & Ruben Van Gaalen & Martin Kolk & Pekka Martikainen, 2021. "Regional variation in women’s education-fertility nexus in Northern and Western Europe," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2021-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. Danuta DUDA & Kamila TUREÄŒKOVÃ & Ivona BURYOVÃ & Radka KUBALOVÃ, 2022. "Maternity benefit: comparison of systems and financing in V4 countries," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 141-163, October.
    7. Jonas Wood & Leen Marynissen & Dries Gasse, 2023. "When is it About the Money? Relative Wages and Fathers’ Parental Leave Decisions," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(6), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:222-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.