IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v8y2020i2p222-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Socialization and Digital Inclusion: Understanding Digital Literacy Biographies among Young People in Madrid

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Calderón Gómez

    (Department of Social Anthropology and Social Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to analyze young people’s technological socialization experiences to build a comprehensive model of the distinctive digital literacies interwoven with their biographies. Considering that digital accessibility is a necessary but not sufficient condition for inclusion, we identify which types of digital literacies are linked to the acquisition of digital competencies, confidence, and dispositions towards the incorporation of ICTs into daily activities; on the other hand, we also identify digital literacies that might engender motivated processes of self-exclusion from the digital realm, therefore reinforcing subjects’ digital exclusion. Methodologically, this article is based on 30 in-depth biographically-oriented qualitative interviews with young people living in the region of Madrid, Spain. Regarding results, four techno-social dimensions are proposed—motivation, degree of formality, degree of sociality, and type of technological domestication—to construct a typology of four ideal forms of digital literacy: unconscious literacy, self-motivated literacy, professional literacy, and social support. To achieve digital inclusion, self-motivation towards using digital technologies is mandatory, but social practices, academic and professional literacy might work as a secondary socialization process that enhance subjects’ affinity with ICTs. Nevertheless, the effect of social support is ambivalent: It could promote digital inclusion among people already interested in digital technologies, but it could also lead to dynamics of self-exclusion among people who are not confident regarding their digital competencies or disinterested in ICTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Calderón Gómez, 2020. "Technological Socialization and Digital Inclusion: Understanding Digital Literacy Biographies among Young People in Madrid," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 222-232.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:222-232
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2601
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v8i2.2601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahla Ghobadi & Zahra Ghobadi, 2015. "How access gaps interact and shape digital divide: a cognitive investigation," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 330-340, April.
    2. Amy Antonio & David Tuffley, 2014. "The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhandari, Aarushi & Burroway, Rebekah, 2023. "Hold the phone! A cross-national analysis of Women's education, mobile phones, and HIV infections in low- and middle-income countries, 1990–2018," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    2. Robert Ferritto, 2024. "Will policy help close the digital gender divide? An intersectional feminist policy analysis of Ethiopia's national digital policy," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(2), March.
    3. Erica L. Gallindo & Hobson A. Cruz & Mário W. L. Moreira, 2021. "Critical Examination Using Business Intelligence on the Gender Gap in Information Technology in Brazil," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2021. "Mobile phones, leadership and gender in rural business groups," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    5. Shiferaw, Yegnanew A., 2024. "A spatial analysis of the digital gender gap in South Africa: Are there any fundamental differences?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Muhammad Imran & Umair Qazi & Ferda Ofli, 2022. "TBCOV: Two Billion Multilingual COVID-19 Tweets with Sentiment, Entity, Geo, and Gender Labels," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Taron, Avinandan & Drechsel, Pay & Gebrezgabher, Solomie, 2021. "Gender dimensions of solid and liquid waste management for reuse in agriculture in Asia and Africa," Resource Recovery and Reuse Series H050720, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Siti Fairus Fuzi & Nurul Emyza Zahidi & Bushra Abdul Halim & Siti Nursyahira Zainudin & Siti Ramizah Jama & Nordianah Jusoh & Wan Hartini Wan Hassan, 2025. "Investigating the Interplay of Motivational Access, Physical Access and Digital Skills Access to ICT on Internet Usage Diversity," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(1), pages 297-313.
    9. Pedro Malo-Perisé & José Merseguer, 2022. "The “Socialized Architecture”: A Software Engineering Approach for a New Cloud," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Christina Sanchita Shah & Satish Krishnan, 2025. "Digital Gender Gap, Gender Equality and National Institutional Freedom: A Dynamic Panel Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 605-634, April.
    11. Costa, Helia & Pisu, Mauro & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2022. "Short Term Cost of Cash and Mobile Financial Services: Evidence from a natural experiment in India," TSE Working Papers 22-1351, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Emanuel Orkoh & Robert Teh, 2025. "Inclusive Trade Through Online Presence," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 314-333, January.
    13. David Tuffley & Amy Antonio, 2015. "Enhancing Educational Opportunities with Computer-Mediated Assessment Feedback," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    14. A García-Suaza & D Rodr�guez-Gonz�lez & A Sarango & J. D Mayorga & A Pretel & S Husain-Talero & L Zarama & J. C., Gir�n, D., Medina, N Urbano, 2022. "Los impactos de la inclusión financiera en los micronegocios: factores que explican aumentos en los ingresos y crecimiento de los negocios," Documentos de Trabajo 20418, Universidad del Rosario.
    15. Waqas Shair & Tatheer Zahra & Muhammad Tayyab & Neelam Kubra, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Divide on Wage Gaps among Individuals in Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(4), pages 97-107, December.
    16. Mellon,Jonathan & Peixoto,Tiago Carneiro & Sjoberg,Fredrik Matias, 2022. "The Haves and the Have Nots : Civic Technologies and the Pathways to Government Responsiveness," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10195, The World Bank.
    17. López-Martínez María & García-Luque Olga & Rodríguez-Pasquín Myriam, 2021. "Digital Gender Divide and Convergence in the European Union Countries," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 115-128, January.
    18. Hina Amber & Bezawit Beyene Chichaibelu, 2023. "Narrowing the gender digital divide in Pakistan: Mobile phone ownership and female labor force participation," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1354-1382, August.
    19. Romero-Martínez, Ana M. & García-Muiña, Fernando E., 2021. "Digitalization level, corruptive practices, and location choice in the hotel industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 176-185.
    20. Jenhung Wang & Pei-Chun Lin, 2024. "Spatial Spillover of the Global Internet Penetration Rate and the Digital Gender Divide," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:222-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.