IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v3y2015i5p126-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prolonged Inclusion of Roma Groups in Swedish Society

Author

Listed:
  • Norma Montesino

    (School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden)

  • Ida Ohlsson Al Fakir

    (Department of Cultural Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden)

Abstract

Inclusion policies focusing on Roma groups started in Sweden during the 1950s, when the Swedish government recognized the formal citizen status of the so called “Swedish Gypsies”, a group consisting of approximately 740 people. As the Roma were perceived as people living outside the boundaries of normal society, the challenge facing the Swedish authorities was how to outline and organize the new policies. In our analyses we focus on the taken-for-granted premises of these policies. We discuss the “entry process” of these Roma into Swedish society. People-processing organizations classified Roma as “socially disabled” in different administrative contexts. In the early 1960s adult male Roma were classified as socially disabled on the labor market. Later during the same decade, experts and professionals increasingly focused attention on the Roma family as a problematic institution. In this context, Roma adults were classified as disabled in relation to the normative representations of parental capacities during that time, while Roma children of school age were defined as children with difficulties and put in special groups for children with problems. The related interventions were justified by a discourse on social inclusion, but in reality produced a web of measures, practices and yet further interventions, which in the long run have contributed to perpetuate the social marginality of Roma groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Norma Montesino & Ida Ohlsson Al Fakir, 2015. "The Prolonged Inclusion of Roma Groups in Swedish Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(5), pages 126-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:126-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/247
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sainsbury, Diane, 2012. "Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199654789.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Agnès Détourbe & Gaële Goastellec, 2018. "Revisiting the Issues of Access to Higher Education and Social Stratification through the Case of Refugees: A Comparative Study of Spaces of Opportunity for Refugee Students in Germany and England," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Younsook Yeo, 2017. "Healthcare inequality issues among immigrant elders after neoliberal welfare reform: empirical findings from the United States," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 547-565, June.
    3. Cecilia Bruzelius & Constantin Reinprecht & Martin Seeleib-Kaiser, 2017. "Stratified Social Rights Limiting EU Citizenship," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1239-1253, November.
    4. Mojca Pajnik, 2016. "‘Wasted precariat’: Migrant work in European societies," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(2), pages 159-172, April.
    5. Peter O'Brien, 2019. "Bordering in Europe: Differential Inclusion," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 9(1), pages 43-62, January-J.
    6. Johanna K Schenner & Anders Neergaard, 2019. "Éditorial," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 6-8, February.
    7. Diedrich, Andreas, 2017. "Validation of immigrants’ prior foreign learning as a framing practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 729-736.
    8. Isabel Shutes, 2022. "Immigration Policies and the Risks of Single Parenthood for Migrant Women," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 149-162, July.
    9. Boris Heizmann & Alexander Jedinger & Anja Perry, 2018. "Welfare Chauvinism, Economic Insecurity and the Asylum Seeker “Crisis”," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Kyunghwan Kim, 2021. "An intersection of East Asian welfare and immigration regimes: The social rights of low‐skilled labour migrants in Japan and Korea," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 226-238, April.
    11. Beiyi Hu, 2018. "The Weight of Categories: Geographically Inscribed Otherness in Botkyrka Municipality, Sweden," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Johanna K Schenner & Anders Neergaard, 2019. "Editorial," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 9-12, February.
    13. Johanna K Schenner & Anders Neergaard, 2019. "Editorial," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 3-5, February.
    14. Karin Borevi & Bo Bengtsson, 2015. "The tension between choice and need in the housing of newcomers: A theoretical framework and an application on Scandinavian settlement policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2599-2615, November.
    15. Dentinho Tomaz Ponce, 2015. "Facing Mediterranean Challenges with Memories, Realities and Feasible Dreams," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 121-127.
    16. Antonio M. Jaime-Castillo & Ildefonso Marqués-Perales & Javier Álvarez-Gálvez, 2016. "The Impact of Social Expenditure on Attitudes Towards Immigration in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 1089-1108, April.
    17. Erika K. Gubrium & Ariana Fernandes Guilherme, 2014. "Policing Norwegian Welfare: Disciplining and Differentiating within the Bottom Rungs," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 005-017.
    18. Laurie C. Maldonado & Rense Nieuwenhuis, 2014. "Family Policies and Single Parent Poverty in 18 OECD Countries, 1978-2008," LIS Working papers 622, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    19. Rense Nieuwenhuis & Teresa Munzi & Janet C. Gornick, 2017. "Comparative Research with Net and Gross Income Data: An Evaluation of Two Netting Down Procedures for the LIS Database," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(3), pages 564-573, September.
    20. Afonso, Alexandre & Negash, Samir & Wolff, Emily Anne, 2022. "Migration and Welfare States," OSF Preprints my64b, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:126-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.