IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v8y2020i3p1-5.html

How Populism and Polarization Affect Europe’s Liberal Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Schulze

    (GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany)

  • Marlene Mauk

    (GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany)

  • Jonas Linde

    (Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

In recent years, two phenomena have put Europe’s liberal democracies under strain: populism and polarization. The rise of populist parties, the increasing radicalization of publics and political discourse, as well as the expansion of hyperpartisan media have caused concern among observers and citizens alike. While lively academic discussions have revolved around the causes of these phenomena, research regarding their real-world consequences has been sparse. This thematic issue wants to address this gap in the literature and contribute to developing strategies for mitigating potential threats populism and polarization may pose to liberal democracies. To this end, it examines how populism and polarization affect citizens across Europe. It links research on audiences of hyperpartisan media with work on elite-induced polarization, populist conceptions of democracy, election results and support for the democratic system, and policy-making by populist governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Schulze & Marlene Mauk & Jonas Linde, 2020. "How Populism and Polarization Affect Europe’s Liberal Democracies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.3460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v8i3.3460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Erik Berntzen, 2020. "How Elite Politicization of Terror Impacts Sympathies for Partisans: Radical Right versus Social Democrats," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 19-31.
    2. Shanto Iyengar & Sean J. Westwood, 2015. "Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 690-707, July.
    3. Margaret Canovan, 1999. "Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(1), pages 2-16, March.
    4. Lars Erik Berntzen, 2020. "How Elite Politicization of Terror Impacts Sympathies for Partisans: Radical Right versus Social Democrats," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 19-31.
    5. Attila Bartha & Zsolt Boda & Dorottya Szikra, 2020. "When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualising Populism in Policy Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 71-81.
    6. Hetherington, Marc J., 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 791-808, December.
    7. Attila Bartha & Zsolt Boda & Dorottya Szikra, 2020. "When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualising Populism in Policy Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Cervi & Santiago Tejedor & Mónica Gracia Villar, 2023. "Twitting Against the Enemy: Populist Radical Right Parties Discourse Against the (Political) “Other”," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 235-248.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heidi Schulze & Marlene Mauk & Jonas Linde, 2020. "How Populism and Polarization Affect Europe’s Liberal Democracies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-5.
    2. David Aprasidze & David S. Siroky, 2020. "Technocratic Populism in Hybrid Regimes: Georgia on My Mind and in My Pocket," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 580-589.
    3. Juan Enrique Gonzálvez-Vallés & José Daniel Barquero-Cabrero & Natalia Enseñat-Bibiloni, 2023. "Voter’s Perception of Political Messages Against the Elite Classes in Spain: A Quasi‐Experimental Design," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 175-186.
    4. Rudolf Metz & Bendegúz Plesz, 2025. "The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    5. Péter Radó & Bálint Mikola, 2025. "When Illiberals Govern: Educational and Cultural Policies in Hungary and Poland," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    6. Zsolt Enyedi & Petra Guasti & Dean Schafer & Bálint Mikola, 2025. "Illiberal Politics in Europe: Ideology, Policies, and Impact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    7. Ganga, Paula, 2023. "The Environmental Policies of Populist Radical Right Governments," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt15q5794k, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    8. David Aprasidze & David S. Siroky, 2020. "Technocratic Populism in Hybrid Regimes: Georgia on My Mind and in My Pocket," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 580-589.
    9. Málovics, György & Wahyuni, Andi Sri, 2025. "Bottom-up struggle in a hostile environment? Factors influencing the spread of University-Community Engagement (UCE): Experiences from Hungary," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Zoltán BRETTER, 2022. "Comparative populism: Romania and Hungary," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 183-206, October.
    11. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    12. Alfred Wong & Sofia Fang & Dean Tjosvold, 2012. "Developing business trust in government through resource exchange in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1027-1043, December.
    13. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Lane, Tom & Miller, Luis & Rodriguez, Isabel, 2024. "The normative permissiveness of political partyism," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Mazen Hassan & Sarah Mansour & Stefan Voigt & May Gadallah, 2022. "When Syria was in Egypt’s land: Egyptians cooperate with Syrians, but less with each other," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 337-362, June.
    16. Marija Džunić & Nataša Golubović & Srđan Marinković, 2020. "Determinants Of Institutional Trust In Transition Economies: Lessons From Serbia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(225), pages 135-162, April – J.
    17. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    18. Faisal Z. Ahmed, 2017. "Remittances and incumbency: Theory and evidence," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 22-47, March.
    19. Muryanto Amin & Alwi Dahlan Ritonga, 2023. "Populist student organizations in Indonesia: an analysis of anti-establishment ideas," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Hossein Kermani & Mohammad Makki & Fatemeh Oudlajani & Pardis Yarahmadi & Hamideh Mahdi Soltani & Zahra HosseiniKhoo, 2026. "Incivility, domination, and resistance: rhetorical practices on Persian Twitter during the #MahsaAmini movement," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.