IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v4y2016i3p100-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Federal Features of the EU: Lessons from Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Verdun

    (Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, Canada)

Abstract

There has been a rise and fall in interest in federalism in the context of European integration. This article assesses the federal nature of the EU. It draws in particular on the work of Michael Burgess who has been one of the key thinkers on this issue. Because there are many types of ‘federalisms’ available across the globe, it is helpful to make a comparison with another political system to offer a base line. In this article I explore to what extent the EU already has federal features. With the help of the work of Burgess I seek to look beyond the specific characteristics of the EU and reflect on how a comparison with this other polity can offer us insights into what is going on within the EU political system. Drawing on the comparison with Canada, I seek to identify the characteristics of the EU that are already those of a federation. Therefore, the guiding question of this article is: compared to Canada, what particular features does the EU have that reminds us of a federation and what features is it still lacking? It finds that the EU has a considerable amount of federal features (federation), but that a federal tradition, a federal ideology and advocacy to a federal goal (federalism) are mostly absent.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Verdun, 2016. "The Federal Features of the EU: Lessons from Canada," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 100-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v4:y:2016:i:3:p:100-110
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i3.598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v4i3.598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McKay, David, 2001. "Designing Europe: Comparative Lessons from the Federal Experience," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199244355.
    2. Christopher J. Bickerton & Dermot Hodson & Uwe Puetter, 2015. "The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 703-722, July.
    3. Dermot Hodson, 2013. "The Eurozone in 2012: ‘Whatever It Takes to Preserve the Euro'?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 183-200, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Hoppe & Lori Thorlakson & Johannes Müller Gómez, 2023. "Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 226-230.
    2. Russell Alan Williams & Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay, 2016. "Norms, Institutions and Governance in an Era of Uncertainty: Connecting the Disparate Scholarship," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Verdun, 2016. "The Federal Features of the EU: Lessons from Canada," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 100-110.
    2. Boyer, Robert, 2003. "European and Asian integration processes compared," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 0302, CEPREMAP.
    3. Raphael Fischer & Gunther Schnabl, 2018. "Regional heterogeneity, the rise of public debt and monetary policy in post-bubble Japan: lessons for the EMU," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 405-428, April.
    4. Sebastian Blesse & Pierre C Boyer & Friedrich Heinemann & Eckhard Janeba & Anasuya Raj, 2019. "European Monetary Union reform preferences of French and German parliamentarians," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 406-424, September.
    5. Sebastian Diessner & Philipp Genschel, 2025. "Monetary‐Fiscal Interactions and the Problem of Outdated Commitments: Eurozone Crisis Versus Covid‐19," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    6. Diessner, Sebastian, 2024. "Monetary-Fiscal Interactions and the Problem of Outdated Commitments: Eurozone Crisis Versus Covid-19," OSF Preprints vwrgs, Center for Open Science.
    7. Tomas Adam & Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Babecky & Vojtech Belling & Sona Benecka & Jan Bruha & Kamil Galuscak & Tomas Holub & Eva Hromadkova & Lubos Komarek & Zlatuse Komarkova & Kamila Kulhava , 2015. "Analyses of the Czech Republic's Current Economic Alignment with the Euro Area 2015," Occasional Publications - Edited Volumes, Czech National Bank, Research and Statistics Department, number as15 edited by Kamila Kulhava & Lucie Matejkova, July-Dece.
    8. Paolo Dardanelli, 2019. "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Mapping State Structures—with an Application to Western Europe, 1950–2015," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 271-298.
    9. Tilo Felgenhauer, 2013. "Strategic Regionalization and the Media: Examples from Germany's Regional Public Broadcasts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1220-1234, September.
    10. Viviane Gravey & Aron Buzogány, 2021. "For Farmers or the Environment? The European Parliament in the 2013 CAP Reform," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 16-28.
    11. Andreas Føllesdal, 2002. "Drafting a European Constitution – Challenges and Opportunities," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0017, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    12. Aukje van Loon, 2021. "European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-218.
    13. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:287-307 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lars Feld, 2005. "The European constitution project from the perspective of constitutional political economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 417-448, March.
    15. Mattia Guidi & Igor Guardiancich, 2018. "Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European Semester," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 684-706, December.
    16. Karin Vaagland, 2021. "Crisis-Induced Leadership: Exploring the Role of the EU Commission in the EU–Jordan Compact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 52-62.
    17. repec:osf:osfxxx:vwrgs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Brigitte Pircher & Mike Farjam, 2021. "Oppositional voting in the Council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 472-494, September.
    19. Dermot Hodson, 2015. "Eurozone Governance: Deflation, Grexit 2.0 and the Second Coming of Jean-Claude Juncker," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53, pages 144-161, September.
    20. Pamela Pansardi & Pier Domenico Tortola, 2022. "A “More Political” Commission? Reassessing EC Politicization through Language," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1047-1068, July.
    21. Ariadna Ripoll Servent & Angela Tacea, 2021. "Resilient Institutions: The Impact of Rule Change on Policy Outputs in European Union Decision-Making Processes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 1-4.
    22. Robert Boyer, 2013. "The euro crisis: undetected by conventional economics, favoured by nationally focused polity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(3), pages 533-569.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v4:y:2016:i:3:p:100-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.