IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i3p226-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Hoppe

    (Utrecht School of Governance, Utrecht University, The Netherlands / Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg‐Essen, Germany)

  • Lori Thorlakson

    (Department of Political Science, University of Alberta, Canada)

  • Johannes Müller Gómez

    (Geschwister Scholl Institute of Political Science, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany / Department of Political Science, Université de Montréal, Canada)

Abstract

In the last decades, EU studies have increasingly broadened in terms of their theoretical and methodological approaches. By now, comparative concepts and theories are an integral part of studying the EU, which aids the study of its polity, politics, and policies. Despite the indisputable peculiarity of the EU as a political system, many scholars have stressed the value of using comparative approaches to study it. This thematic issue aims to investigate a specific case—the political system of Canada—as to its merit for comparison with the EU. While both systems have been described as sui generis in the past, forming a class of political system by themselves, recently the similarities between both have been stressed. This thematic issue gathers articles that compare different aspects of these two systems—focusing on polity, politics, and policy—to reap the benefits of the comparative approach and gain new insights into the functioning of both systems. The contributions to the thematic issue show the benefits that both Canadian political science and EU studies can gain from engaging in comparative exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Hoppe & Lori Thorlakson & Johannes Müller Gómez, 2023. "Merits and Challenges of Comparing the EU and Canada," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 226-230.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:226-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7569
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Verdun, 2016. "The Federal Features of the EU: Lessons from Canada," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 100-110.
    2. Catherine Xhardez & Dagmar Soennecken, 2023. "Temporary Protection in Times of Crisis: The European Union, Canada, and the Invasion of Ukraine," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 264-275.
    3. Achim Hurrelmann, 2023. "Constitutional Abeyances: Reflecting on EU Treaty Development in Light of the Canadian Experience," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 241-250.
    4. Pier Domenico Tortola, 2014. "The Limits of Normalization: Taking Stock of the EU‐US Comparative Literature," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1342-1357, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Russell Alan Williams & Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay, 2016. "Norms, Institutions and Governance in an Era of Uncertainty: Connecting the Disparate Scholarship," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.
    2. Ian Manners & Richard Whitman, 2016. "Another Theory is Possible: Dissident Voices in Theorising Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 3-18, January.
    3. Wozniakowski, Tomasz P., 2016. "Towards Fiscalization of the European Union? The US and EU Fiscal Unions in a Comparative Historical Perspective," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt667699tw, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:226-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.