Author
Listed:
- Dimokritos M. Kavadias
(Political Science Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium)
- Eline Severs
(Political Science Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium)
- Elly Mansoury
(Political Science Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium)
Abstract
Adding to the literature on generational differences in democratic support, this article argues that younger citizens in consolidated European democracies are not inherently less democratic but may be affected differently by the rapid succession of “once‐in‐a‐generation” crises during the past decade, including the Covid‐19 pandemic, war on the European continent, economic volatility, welfare state transformation, and shifting geopolitical relations. We hypothesise that this condition of polycrisis reshapes the experiential foundations of democratic legitimacy. We examine how support for democracy is structured along generationally differentiated pathways, particularly in contexts of growing uncertainty about the future, understood here as ontological insecurity. Drawing on original survey data (the REDIRECT dataset) collected in 2025 across eight European countries (Belgium, Germany, France, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, and the UK), we estimate country fixed‐effects regression models with robust standard errors. The analysis examines how material insecurity and identity‐related insecurity shape institutional trust, perceived societal threat, and democratic support. The findings challenge narratives of a generalised democratic disengagement or disconnect among younger generations. Institutional trust emerges as the principal mechanism linking insecurity to democratic support, whereas perceived societal threat plays only a limited role. Age moderates these relationships: experiences of social denigration are more strongly associated with democratic support among younger respondents, whereas institutional trust becomes progressively more important among older cohorts. Moreover, identity‐related insecurity, operationalised as perceived social denigration, is associated with lower institutional trust but higher democratic support, suggesting that experiences of exclusion may undermine confidence in existing institutions without necessarily weakening attachment to democratic principles.
Suggested Citation
Dimokritos M. Kavadias & Eline Severs & Elly Mansoury, 2026.
"Rethinking Democratic Disconnect: Ontological Insecurity, Institutional Trust, and Democratic Support Across Generations,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:12334
DOI: 10.17645/pag.12334
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:12334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.