IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a9466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Far‐Right Illiberalism in the European Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Böckmann

    (Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands / Centre d’étude de la vie politique (Cevipol), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Sarah L. de Lange

    (Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Nathalie Brack

    (Centre d’étude de la vie politique (Cevipol), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Matthijs Rooduijn

    (Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The rise of illiberalism has become a global concern, especially since the establishment of far‐right illiberal regimes in countries such as Hungary, India, Poland, and Turkey. When in power, far‐right parties tend to promote democratic backsliding, leading to a proliferation of studies of the illiberal regimes established by the far‐right. Less attention has been paid so far to the embrace of illiberal ideas by these parties. Although studies of these parties’ populism, nativism, and authoritarianism are ubiquitous, we know little about the way in which these three ideological pillars become integrated into an overarching illiberal agenda. This article aims to analyze the extent to which European far‐right parties embrace illiberal ideas, irrespective of whether they are in power. To pursue this objective, we focus on parliamentary speeches given by far‐right parties in the European Parliament between 1999 and 2019. Methodologically, we employ a dictionary‐based content analysis to identify which speeches by far‐right members of the European Parliament contain illiberal ideas. Subsequently, we measure the percentage of far‐right illiberal speeches per year. Our study shows that although illiberalism has always been a relevant feature of the far‐right, illiberal ideas have become more prominent in speeches of far‐right members of the European Parliament since 2017, after Brexit and the election of Trump.

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Böckmann & Sarah L. de Lange & Nathalie Brack & Matthijs Rooduijn, 2025. "Far‐Right Illiberalism in the European Parliament," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9466
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.9466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.9466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abou-Chadi, Tarik & Krause, Werner, 2020. "The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 829-847, July.
    2. Caramani, Daniele, 2017. "Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(1), pages 54-67, February.
    3. Abou-Chadi, Tarik & Krause, Werner, 2020. "The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 829-847.
    4. Hunger, Sophia, 2024. "Virtuous people and evil elites? The role of moralizing frames and normative distinctions in identifying populist discourse," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26.
    5. Grimmer, Justin & Stewart, Brandon M., 2013. "Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 267-297, July.
    6. Margaret Canovan, 1999. "Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(1), pages 2-16, March.
    7. de Vries, Erik & Schoonvelde, Martijn & Schumacher, Gijs, 2018. "No Longer Lost in Translation: Evidence that Google Translate Works for Comparative Bag-of-Words Text Applications," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 417-430, October.
    8. Carolina Milhorance, 2022. "Policy dismantling and democratic regression in Brazil under Bolsonaro: Coalition politics, ideas, and underlying discourses," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 752-770, November.
    9. Marie‐Ève Bélanger & Natasha Wunsch, 2022. "From Cohesion to Contagion? Populist Radical Right Contestation of EU Enlargement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 653-672, May.
    10. Achim Hurrelmann & Anna Gora & Andrea Wagner, 2015. "The Politicization of European Integration: More than an Elite Affair?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63(1), pages 43-59, March.
    11. Nathalie Brack & Awenig Marié, 2024. "From fringe to front? Assessing the voting influence of the radical right in the European Parliament," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(4), pages 748-771, December.
    12. Seraphine F. Maerz & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2020. "Comparing public communication in democracies and autocracies: automated text analyses of speeches by heads of government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 517-545, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giebler, Heiko & Werner, Annika, 2020. "Cure, Poison or Placebo? The Consequences of Populist and Radical Party Success for Representative Democracy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 293-306.
    2. Spyros Economides & Kevin Featherstone & Tom Hunter, 2024. "The Changing Discourses of EU Enlargement: A Longitudinal Analysis of National Parliamentary Debates," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 168-185, January.
    3. Matti Sarvimäki, 2021. "Managing Refugee Protection Crises: Policy Lessons from Economics and Political Science," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 2131, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    4. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    5. Marinho Bertanha & Eunyi Chung, 2023. "Permutation Tests at Nonparametric Rates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(544), pages 2833-2846, October.
    6. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    7. Fernando Filgueiras & Pedro Palotti & Graziella G. Testa, 2023. "Complexing Governance Styles: Connecting Politics and Policy in Governance Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    8. Ferrara, Federico M. & Masciandaro, Donato & Moschella, Manuela & Romelli, Davide, 2022. "Political voice on monetary policy: Evidence from the parliamentary hearings of the European Central Bank," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Salomon, Katja, 2020. "Dynamics of immigrant resentment in Europe," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2020-002, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Andrea Junqueira & Ali Kagalwala & Christine S. Lipsmeyer, 2023. "What's your problem? How issue ownership and partisan discourse influence personal concerns," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(1), pages 25-37, January.
    11. Tähtinen, Tuuli, 2025. "Populism and ideological convergence: Evidence from a multiparty system," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Seraphine F. Maerz & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2020. "Comparing public communication in democracies and autocracies: automated text analyses of speeches by heads of government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 517-545, April.
    13. Bayerlein, Michael, 2021. "Chasing the Other 'Populist Zeitgeist'? Mainstream Parties and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 240403, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Josefina Erikson & Cecilia Josefsson, 2024. "Adverse Contagion? Populist Radical Right Parties and Norms on Gender Balance in Political Institutions," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    15. Roman Hlatky, 2023. "The politicization of European integration and support for restrictive migration policies," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(4), pages 684-707, December.
    16. Kittel, Rebecca C., 2025. "Let's talk populist? A survey experiment on effects of (non‐) populist discourse on vote choice," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 64, pages 719-743.
    17. Pablo M. Flores & Martin Hilbert, 2023. "Temporal communication dynamics in the aftermath of large-scale upheavals: do digital footprints reveal a stage model?," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 973-999, October.
    18. Alexandre Chirat & Cyril Hédoin, 2023. "Toward an economic theory of populism: Uncertainty, Information, and Public Interest in Downs’s Political Economy," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-16, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    19. Mihail Chiru, 2024. "Seniority and Ideological Proximity? A Longitudinal Analysis of the Appointment of Party Group Coordinators in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 127-141, January.
    20. Ellger, Fabio & Klüver, Heike, 2024. "Adopting restriction: how coalition governments respond to radical right parties," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.