Author
Listed:
- Larissa Böckmann
(Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands / Centre d’étude de la vie politique (Cevipol), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)
- Sarah L. de Lange
(Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Nathalie Brack
(Centre d’étude de la vie politique (Cevipol), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)
- Matthijs Rooduijn
(Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Abstract
The rise of illiberalism has become a global concern, especially since the establishment of far‐right illiberal regimes in countries such as Hungary, India, Poland, and Turkey. When in power, far‐right parties tend to promote democratic backsliding, leading to a proliferation of studies of the illiberal regimes established by the far‐right. Less attention has been paid so far to the embrace of illiberal ideas by these parties. Although studies of these parties’ populism, nativism, and authoritarianism are ubiquitous, we know little about the way in which these three ideological pillars become integrated into an overarching illiberal agenda. This article aims to analyze the extent to which European far‐right parties embrace illiberal ideas, irrespective of whether they are in power. To pursue this objective, we focus on parliamentary speeches given by far‐right parties in the European Parliament between 1999 and 2019. Methodologically, we employ a dictionary‐based content analysis to identify which speeches by far‐right members of the European Parliament contain illiberal ideas. Subsequently, we measure the percentage of far‐right illiberal speeches per year. Our study shows that although illiberalism has always been a relevant feature of the far‐right, illiberal ideas have become more prominent in speeches of far‐right members of the European Parliament since 2017, after Brexit and the election of Trump.
Suggested Citation
Larissa Böckmann & Sarah L. de Lange & Nathalie Brack & Matthijs Rooduijn, 2025.
"Far‐Right Illiberalism in the European Parliament,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9466
DOI: 10.17645/pag.9466
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.