IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v12y2024a8217.html

The Geoeconomic Turn in EU Trade and Investment Policy: Implications for Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Weinhardt

    (Department of Political Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands)

  • Ferdi De Ville

    (Department of Political Science, Ghent University, Belgium)

Abstract

The so-called geoeconomic turn in global trade policy-making has changed the context in which the European Union positions itself as a trade actor. However, there is little scholarly attention paid to how the geoeconomic turn affects the EU’s relations with developing countries. This article analyses the potential implications of new EU autonomous trade and investment instruments for developing countries, and how the EU has taken these consequences into account when designing them. We rely on a combination of desk research of official documents, trade data, and secondary literature complemented with expert interviews. We find that a trade-off between geoeconomic and development objectives is more pertinent in sustainability-related than in competitiveness- and security-oriented instruments. In these sustainability instruments, differential treatment of developing countries rarely features in the design—despite some proposals having been made. The geoeconomic turn has thus made it more difficult to align the different objectives in the EU’s trade and investment policies, and development concerns are sometimes relegated to the background.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Weinhardt & Ferdi De Ville, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn in EU Trade and Investment Policy: Implications for Developing Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:8217
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.8217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.8217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Partzsch, Lena & Müller, Lukas Maximilian & Sacherer, Anne-Kathrin, 2023. "Can supply chain laws prevent deforestation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Luuk Schmitz & Timo Seidl, 2023. "As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary: Understanding the Rise of Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 834-852, May.
    3. Guilherme Magacho & Etienne Espagne & Antoine Godin, 2024. "Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-259, February.
    4. Sophie Meunier & Kalypso Nicolaidis, 2019. "The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 103-113, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessia Invernizzi & Aydin B. Yildirim & Arlo Poletti, 2026. "Differentiated protectionism in the European Union: The role of superstar exporters and fiscal capacity," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 113-135, March.
    2. Tomasz Jerzyniak, 2024. "The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies: Towards a New Clean Energy Geopolitical Order?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    3. Susanna Paleari, 2024. "The Role of Strategic Autonomy in the EU Green Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Antonio Calcara & Arlo Poletti, 2023. "Varieties of Anti‐Globalism: The Italian Government’s Evolving Stance on the EU’s Investment Screening Mechanism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 177-187.
    5. Antonio Calcara & Arlo Poletti, 2023. "Varieties of Anti‐Globalism: The Italian Government’s Evolving Stance on the EU’s Investment Screening Mechanism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 177-187.
    6. Emil Kirchner, 2024. "Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-349, September.
    7. Lena Kittel & Ulrich Fahl, 2025. "Carbon Leakage Protection—Model-Based Comparison of the Macroeconomic Effects of Different Instruments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Patricia Garcia-Duran & L. Johan Eliasson & Oriol Costa, 2023. "Commerce and Security Meet in the European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 165-176.
    9. Youcef Bakhtaoui & Fadoua Eljai, 2025. "The Concept of Industrial Sovereignty in Morocco: An Old-New Paradigm Le concept de souveraineté industrielle au Maroc : Un paradigme ancien-nouveau [Le concept de souveraineté industrielle au Maroc : Un paradigme ancien-nouveau]," Post-Print hal-05111573, HAL.
    10. Andrea Coveri & Raffaele Giammetti & Antonello Zanfei, 2025. "How fragile are European GVCs? The role of functional diversification and implications for industrial policy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(3), pages 629-666, September.
    11. Eugénia C. Heldt, 2023. "Europe’s Global Gateway: A New Instrument of Geopolitics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 223-234.
    12. Zenobia T. Chan & Sophie Meunier, 2022. "Behind the screen: Understanding national support for a foreign investment screening mechanism in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-541, July.
    13. Luuk Schmitz & Timo Seidl, 2023. "As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary: Understanding the Rise of Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 834-852, May.
    14. Philipp Köncke & Nana de Graaff, 2024. "Chinese Multinationals and Europe’s Geoeconomic Turn: The De‐Globalization of the Chinese ICT and Automotive Industry?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    15. Miriam Frauenlob, 2025. "The return of industrial policy in the United States and the EU: A comparative perspective," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 51(2), pages 55-73.
    16. Huseyin Caliskan & Ustuner Birben & Sezgin Ozden, 2025. "Forest management in Türkiye: economic pressures, legal frameworks, and ecological consequences," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 21-39, March.
    17. Teodor Kalpakchiev & Brent Jacobs & Markus Fraundorfer & Julia Martin-Ortega & Dana Cordell, 2025. "Creating an Alternative Governance for Phosphorus Circularity Through Framings That Strengthen Intersectoral Policy Coherence in the EU: Constraints and Implementation Possibilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-33, February.
    18. Ablam Estel Apeti & Bossoma Doriane N’doua, 2023. "The impact of timber regulations on timber and timber product trade," Post-Print hal-04262489, HAL.
    19. Chen, Zhe-Yi & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cheng, Lei & Qiu, Rui-Xiang, 2025. "How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Constantin Johnson & Max Åhman & Lars J. Nilsson & Zhenxi Li, 2025. "Emerging green steel markets surrounding the EU emissions trading system and carbon border adjustment mechanism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:8217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.