IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i4p187-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idols of Promotion and Authenticity on TikTok

Author

Listed:
  • Radu M. Meza

    (Department of Journalism and Digital Media, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania)

  • Andreea-Alina Mogoș

    (Department of Journalism and Digital Media, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania)

  • George Prundaru

    (Department of Journalism and Digital Media, Babeș-Bolyai University, Romania)

Abstract

TikTok’s rapid growth in the past few years, especially in the younger demographic, may signal a market shift. With children, teens, and young adults reportedly making up 40% to 60% of its user base, the platform is becoming the strongest challenger to YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. The most followed TikTok celebrities are mostly young people who have either grown up with the platform or recently extended their popularity from other platforms to reach new audiences. This research investigates the discursive strategies and persona performances employed by the top 25 TikTok celebrities under the age of 25 in both popular content and content marked as advertising. A large sample of TikTok content metadata was collected using API interrogation. From each of the 25 young TikTok celebrities, up to 1,000 videos per user (N = 22,650) are explored using quantitative approaches. Two subsamples are analysed using visual, rhetorical, and narrative analysis to evaluate the most popular content (Np = 226) and content marked as advertising using the TikTok ad flagging (Na = 213). The findings include the identification of seven persona performance types and a significant difference in terms of performed ordinariness in content marked as advertising.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu M. Meza & Andreea-Alina Mogoș & George Prundaru, 2023. "Idols of Promotion and Authenticity on TikTok," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 187-202.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:187-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7123
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    2. Delia Cristina Balaban & Julia Szambolics, 2022. "A Proposed Model of Self-Perceived Authenticity of Social Media Influencers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 235-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diwanji, Vaibhav S. & Cortese, Juliann, 2020. "Contrasting user generated videos versus brand generated videos in ecommerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sánchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    4. M. S. Balaji & Subhash Jha & Marla B. Royne, 2015. "Customer e-complaining behaviours using social media," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11-12), pages 633-654, August.
    5. Agrawal, Shiv Ratan & Mittal, Divya, 2022. "Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    7. Ivanete Schneider Hahn & Flavia Luciane Scherer & Kenny Basso & Marindia Brachak dos Santos, 2016. "Consumer Trust in and Emotional Response to Advertisements on Social Media and their Influence on Brand Evaluation," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(4), pages 49-71, July.
    8. Divakaran, Pradeep Kumar Ponnamma & Xiong, Jie, 2022. "Eliciting brand association networks: A new method using online community data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Baccarella, Christian V. & Wagner, Timm F. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2018. "Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 431-438.
    10. N. Serdar Sever & Goknil Nur Sever & Salar Kuhzady, 2015. "The Evaluation of Potentials of Gamification in Tourism Marketing Communication," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(10), pages 188-202, October.
    11. Zheng Shen, 2024. "Shall brands create their own virtual influencers? A comprehensive study of 33 virtual influencers on Instagram," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Hofman-Kohlmeyer Magdalena, 2021. "Brand-Related User-Generated Content in Simulation Video Games: Qualitative Research Among Polish Players," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 61-87, March.
    13. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Stefania Farace & Gaetano Nino Miceli, 2018. "User-Generated Systems of Signs and Meanings in Product Customization: Taxonomies and Research Directions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 61-83.
    14. He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Lee, Ruby P. & Wang, Yonggui & Pohlmann, Attila, 2017. "Consumers' Role Performance and Brand Identification: Evidence from a Survey and a Longitudinal Field Experiment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Kawaf, Fatema & Istanbulluoglu, Doga, 2019. "Online fashion shopping paradox: The role of customer reviews and facebook marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 144-153.
    16. Symeon Symeonidis & Georgios Peikos & Avi Arampatzis, 2022. "Unsupervised consumer intention and sentiment mining from microblogging data as a business intelligence tool," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 6007-6036, November.
    17. Ng Kar Weng, 2020. "Facebook Engagement for Craft Entrepreneurs in Malaysia: Project BATU," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(12), pages 21-31, December.
    18. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    19. Wang, Saerom & Kirillova, Ksenia & Lehto, Xinran, 2017. "Reconciling unsatisfying tourism experiences: Message type effectiveness and the role of counterfactual thinking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 233-243.
    20. Maha M. Khan, 2020. "The Impact of Perceived Social Media Marketing Activities: An Empirical Study in Saudi Context," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 134-134, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:187-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.