IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/networ/y2018i11p51-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Memorandum Items In The Notes To Financial Statements Based On It Service Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Veronika FENYVES

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Tibor TARNÓCZI

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Only enterprises with adequate information and ability to convert them into organizational knowledge are able to comply with the challenges in our globalized and accelerated world. Account has paramount importance in economic links between enterprises. It is divided into 2 sections: balance sheet and profit and loss account. Access to information is possible if the notes to financial statement include information that contribute to the better interpretation of the other part of the account. Decision-making based on unadequate knowledge further increases the otherwise not low economic risks.In the research we look into whether the notes to financial statements conducted by the enterprises include information that facilitate the collection of necessary financial knowledge for partner enterprises. Notes to financial statements of enterprises with NACE Code 62 – IT services as their principal activity were used in the analysis. The use of text mining helps us to reveal to what extent notes to financial statements comply with the Act on Accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronika FENYVES & Tibor TARNÓCZI, 2018. "Analysis Of Memorandum Items In The Notes To Financial Statements Based On It Service Providers," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 11, pages 51-57, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2018:i:11:p:51-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_11_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feinerer, Ingo & Hornik, Kurt & Meyer, David, 2008. "Text Mining Infrastructure in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i05).
    2. Musinszki Zoltán, 2016. "Pénzügyi mutatókon innen és túl," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 13(2), pages 71-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grinis, Inna, 2017. "The STEM requirements of "non-STEM" jobs: evidence from UK online vacancy postings and implications for skills & knowledge shortages," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85123, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Julia Bachtrögler & Christoph Hammer & Wolf Heinrich Reuter & Florian Schwendinger, 2019. "Guide to the galaxy of EU regional funds recipients: evidence from new data," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 46(1), pages 103-150, February.
    3. Shuyue Huang & Lena Jingen Liang & Hwansuk Chris Choi, 2022. "How We Failed in Context: A Text-Mining Approach to Understanding Hotel Service Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Laura Anderlucci & Cinzia Viroli, 2020. "Mixtures of Dirichlet-Multinomial distributions for supervised and unsupervised classification of short text data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(4), pages 759-770, December.
    5. Stefano Sbalchiero & Maciej Eder, 2020. "Topic modeling, long texts and the best number of topics. Some Problems and solutions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1095-1108, August.
    6. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Necmettin Alpay Koçak, 2020. "The Role of Ecb Speeches in Nowcasting German Gdp," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 05-20.
    8. JooSeok Oh & Timothy Paul Connerton & Hyun-Jung Kim, 2019. "The Rediscovery of Brand Experience Dimensions with Big Data Analysis: Building for a Sustainable Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Schierholz, Malte & Gensicke, Miriam & Tschersich, Nikolai, 2016. "Occupation coding during the interview," IAB-Discussion Paper 201617, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    10. Igor Barahona & Daría Micaela Hernández & Héctor Hugo Pérez-Villarreal & María Pilar Martínez-Ruíz, 2018. "Identifying research topics in marketing science along the past decade: a content analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 293-312, October.
    11. Sangsung Park & Sunghae Jun, 2020. "Patent Keyword Analysis of Disaster Artificial Intelligence Using Bayesian Network Modeling and Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    12. David C Molik & DeAndre Tomlinson & Shane Davitt & Eric L Morgan & Matthew Sisk & Benjamin Roche & Natalie Meyers & Michael E Pfrender, 2021. "Combining natural language processing and metabarcoding to reveal pathogen-environment associations," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Hornik, Kurt & Grün, Bettina, 2014. "movMF: An R Package for Fitting Mixtures of von Mises-Fisher Distributions," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 58(i10).
    14. Tomasz Kopczewski, 2015. "Think not calculate! Implementation of Felix Klein postulates in economic education with CAS software," Working Papers 2015-38, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    15. Cho, Yung-Jan & Fu, Pei-Wen & Wu, Chi-Cheng, 2017. "Popular Research Topics in Marketing Journals, 1995–2014," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 52-72.
    16. Junhyeog Choi & Sunghae Jun & Sangsung Park, 2016. "A Patent Analysis for Sustainable Technology Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Jingxuan Liu & Ping Qiao & Jian Ding & Luke Hankinson & Elodie H. Harriman & Edward M. Schiller & Ieva Ramanauskaite & Haowei Zhang, 2020. "Will the Aviation Industry Have a Bright Future after the COVID-19 Outbreak? Evidence from Chinese Airport Shipping Sector," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Ingmar Böschen, 2021. "Software review: The JATSdecoder package—extract metadata, abstract and sectioned text from NISO-JATS coded XML documents; Insights to PubMed central’s open access database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9585-9601, December.
    19. B Ian Hutchins & Xin Yuan & James M Anderson & George M Santangelo, 2016. "Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Haunschild, Robin & Bornmann, Lutz, 2023. "Which papers cited which tweets? An exploratory analysis based on Scopus data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Giving information; Account; Text mining; Information;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2018:i:11:p:51-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.