IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/journl/y2015i7p59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Options In Economic And Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru ZAIȚ

    (PhD, professor at “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Iaşi)

Abstract

This article aims to search and formulate a systematic framework for choosing methodology as an essential component of research. The idea originated in quite numerous conceptual and semantic inconsistencies that we have encountered in studies provided at the expense of applied research in economics and management. I did not intend to provide examples, but those situations are not hard to find in different specialized journals, even without reference to the source. Semantic confusion, perhaps less significant in research practice in the areas mentioned, is also pretty present, and it is not at all irrelevant to talk about it, as well. The most delicate aspects of this articles’ approach have as origin some logical inconsistencies in combining various methods, techniques, procedures and research tools. The issue of methodological compatibility is important, that’s why criteria have to be established in this regard. On the basis of such incursions and critical analysis, the article proposes, with a conclusive character and as possible recommendations, a step by step procedure for the methodological choice, under a logic compatibility between methods, techniques, procedures and research instruments, on one hand, and the nature and characteristics of the field of provenience, on the other hand.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru ZAIȚ, 2015. "Methodological Options In Economic And Management Research," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 59-67, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2015:i:7:p:59-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/CMJ2015_I1_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Benavides-Velasco & Cristina Quintana-García & Vanesa Guzmán-Parra, 2013. "Trends in family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-57, January.
    2. Sandip Mukhopadhyay & Rajen K. Gupta, 2014. "Survey of Qualitative Research Methodology in Strategy Research and Implication for Indian Researchers," Vision, , vol. 18(2), pages 109-123, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panita Rachapaettayakom & Mongkolchai Wiriyapinit & Nagul Cooharojananone & Suparatana Tanthanongsakkun & Nuttirudee Charoenruk, 2020. "The need for financial knowledge acquisition tools and technology by small business entrepreneurs," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Angelica-Nicoleta NECULAESEI (ONEA), 2016. "Intercultural Competence Between Desirability And Necessity," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 7-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Classen & Martin Carree & Anita Gils & Bettina Peters, 2014. "Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 595-609, March.
    2. Mikel Alayo & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1517-1560, August.
    3. Jasper Brinkerink, 2023. "When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P-Hacking in Family Business Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 304-343, March.
    4. V. D. Procher & D. Urbig & C. Volkmann, 2013. "Time to BRIC it? Internationalization of European family firms in Europe, North America and the BRIC countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(16), pages 1466-1471, November.
    5. Jie Yang & Jieqiong Ma & Hongxin Zhao & Jim Cater & Mark Arnold, 2019. "Family involvement, environmental turbulence, and R&D investment: evidence from Listed Chinese SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1017-1032, December.
    6. Jiří Hnilica & Lorraine M. Uhlaner & Ondřej Machek & Ales Kubíček & Martin Lukeš & Martin Jurek & Petra Štamfestová, 2019. "The Role of Responsible Ownership and Family in Privately Held Firms with Multiple Owners: Preliminary Findings from the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(5), pages 1-17.
    7. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    8. Aleš Kubíček & Ondřej Machek, 2019. "Gender-related factors in family business succession: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 963-1002, November.
    9. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, Beatriz & Rodríguez-Ariza, Lázaro & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2015. "The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 890-901.
    10. Daoyan Guo & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Hui Lu & Qianyi Long, 2017. "A Co-Word Analysis of Organizational Constraints for Maintaining Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Matthias Tietz & Simon Parker, 2014. "Charitable donations by the self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 899-916, December.
    12. Jordi Moreno-Gené & José Luis Gallizo, 2021. "Intergenerational Differences in Family Business Management and Their Influence on Business Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Faraji, Omid & Ezadpour, Mostafa & Rahrovi Dastjerdi, Alireza & Dolatzarei, Ehsan, 2022. "Conceptual structure of balanced scorecard research: A co-word analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Wu, Hangyao & Xu, Zeshui & Skare, Marinko, 2022. "How do family businesses adapt to the rapid pace of globalization? a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 59-74.
    15. Shashank Bansal & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodriguez-Ariza, 2018. "Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Mediating Role of the Presence of Family Ownership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, July.
    16. repec:zbw:rwirep:0416 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Georgiou, Thoukis & Papasolomou, Ioanna & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2023. "Market-oriented succession effectiveness in family business – Case-based evidence from Cyprus family-owned wine business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    18. Josiane Fahed-Sreih & Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar, 2017. "Strategic Planning, Performance And Innovative Capabilities Of Non-Family Members In Family Businesses," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Fabio Zona, 2015. "Board ownership and processes in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 105-122, January.
    20. Majocchi, Antonio & D’Angelo, Alfredo & Forlani, Emanuele & Buck, Trevor, 2018. "Bifurcation bias and exporting: Can foreign work experience be an answer? Insight from European family SMEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 237-247.
    21. Stewart, Alex, 2018. "Can family business loosen the grips of accounting, economics, and finance?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 153-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2015:i:7:p:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.