IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/briefi/v14y2021i35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Canadian Agriculture: Estimates and Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • YmeÌ€ne Fouli

    (University of Calgary)

  • Margot Hurlbert

    (University of Regina)

  • Roland Kröbel

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Canada produced 729 megatonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018 and approximately 10 per cent of that came from the country’s agricultural sector. Different farming operations produce varying amounts of GHGs, whether they are small animal or crop farms, or large beef cattle operations. Besides field techniques, researchers are using models such as HOLOS – a Canadian whole-farm emissions model – and the Integrated Farm Systems Model, among others, to find ways to target emission sources without hampering a farm’s financial sustainability and production. Other models focus on simulating the productivity and impact of cropping systems on the environment, with the goal of estimating the level of emissions. Other models are used to derive management-driven soil carbon change factors. Carbon footprints vary for every subsector of agriculture and assessing them is a complex effort that involves accounting for every process that occurs throughout production. Methane and nitrous oxide are the main GHGs that agriculture emits at 38 and 36 per cent respectively, with carbon dioxide responsible for the remaining 26 per cent. GHGs arise from enteric fermentation of cattle, the application of synthetic and organic fertilizer, biomass decomposition, soil cultivation and tillage, mineralization of soil organic matter and manure, among other sources. There are many options available for reducing agricultural GHG emissions, depending on the type of farm operation. Soil carbon content can be increased and stored in the soil or in plants to cut CO2 losses to the atmosphere. Carbon storage can be achieved by using cover crops or mulches and switching from annual to perennial cropping, for example. No-till practices permit the soil to develop porosity with better moisture retention and organic matter buildup, creating a healthy environment for roots, microorganisms and fungi. Manure emissions can be managed by capturing CH4 (methane) and using it to generate heat and electricity. Manure piles can also be aerated to reduce emissions. Energy consumption from farm equipment can be reduced through sustainable practices such as reducing tillage, retaining residue and managing mixed-species forests, as well as reducing pesticide and fertilizer applications through diverse cropping systems. In addition to saving fuel consumption, sustainable practices minimize soil erosion. Other sustainable practices include avoiding clear-cutting, contour plowing and using mulches and compost to increase the soil’s carbon and nutrient content. Consumers can make a significant difference in reducing agricultural GHG emissions by making informed choices when purchasing food. Eating a balanced diet that includes a variety of sources of protein can contribute to reducing emissions. Multi-product farm systems that integrate cropping, dairy and beef production have a lower carbon footprint and higher production efficiencies compared to single-product farm systems.

Suggested Citation

  • YmeÌ€ne Fouli & Margot Hurlbert & Roland Kröbel, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Canadian Agriculture: Estimates and Measurements," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(35), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:14:y:2021:i:35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/JSC5_GHG-Emissions_Fouli-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thivierge, Marie-Noëlle & Jégo, Guillaume & Bélanger, Gilles & Chantigny, Martin H. & Rotz, C. Alan & Charbonneau, Édith & Baron, Vern S. & Qian, Budong, 2017. "Projected impact of future climate conditions on the agronomic and environmental performance of Canadian dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 241-257.
    2. Yantai Gan & Chang Liang & Qiang Chai & Reynald L. Lemke & Con A. Campbell & Robert P. Zentner, 2014. "Improving farming practices reduces the carbon footprint of spring wheat production," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Cardoso, Abmael S. & Berndt, Alexandre & Leytem, April & Alves, Bruno J.R. & de Carvalho, Isabel das N.O. & de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique & Urquiaga, Segundo & Boddey, Robert M., 2016. "Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 86-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ymène Fouli & Margot Hurlbert & Roland Kröbel, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Canadian Agriculture: Policies and Reduction Measures," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(13), May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. André Pastori D’Aurea & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Yuri Santa Rosa Guimarães & Lauriston Bertelli Fernandes & Luis Eduardo Ferreira & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2021. "Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Production in Brazil through Animal Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Mosnier, Claire & Duclos, Anne & Agabriel, Jacques & Gac, Armelle, 2017. "Orfee: A bio-economic model to simulate integrated and intensive management of mixed crop-livestock farms and their greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 202-215.
    5. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Zhao, Rongqin & Liu, Ying & Tian, Mengmeng & Ding, Minglei & Cao, Lianhai & Zhang, Zhanping & Chuai, Xiaowei & Xiao, Liangang & Yao, Lunguang, 2018. "Impacts of water and land resources exploitation on agricultural carbon emissions: The water-land-energy-carbon nexus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 480-492.
    7. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Edyta Szafranek & Vasyl Hruban, 2022. "Agricultural Land: Crop Production or Photovoltaic Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    8. K Hervé Dakpo & Laure Latruffe, 2016. "Agri-environmental subsidies and French suckler cow farms’ technical efficiency accounting for GHGs," Working Papers SMART 16-07, INRAE UMR SMART.
    9. Dumas, Patrice & Wirsenius, Stefan & Searchinger, Tim & Andrieu, Nadine & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2022. "Options to achieve net-zero emissions from agriculture and land use changes in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12385, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Calvano, Maria Paula Cavuto Abrão & Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro & Barros, Jacqueline Cavalcante & Garcia, Marcos Valério & Martins, Kauê Rodriguez & Andreotti, Renato, 2021. "Bioeconomic simulation of Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in different beef cattle production systems in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Maciel, Isabella C.F. & Barbosa, Fabiano A. & Alves, Bruno J.R. & Alvarenga, Ramon C. & Tomich, Thierry R. & Campanha, Mônica M. & Rowntree, Jason E. & Alves, Filipe C. & Lana, Ângela M.Q., 2021. "Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from beef cattle excreta deposited on feedlot pen surface in tropical conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Castaño-Sánchez, José P. & Karsten, Heather D. & Rotz, C. Alan, 2022. "Double cropping and manure management mitigate the environmental impact of a dairy farm under present and future climate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Searchinger, Timothy D. & Beringer, Tim & Strong, Asa, 2017. "Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 434-446.
    14. Nisar, Shahida & Benbi, Dinesh Kumar & Toor, Amardeep Singh, 2021. "Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of three tillage systems in maize-wheat sequence of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Alexandre C. Köberle & Pedro R. R. Rochedo & André F. P. Lucena & Alexandre Szklo & Roberto Schaeffer, 2020. "Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2 °C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1823-1842, October.
    16. Shirley LAMPTEY & Lingling LI & Junhong XIE, 2018. "Impact of nitrogen fertilization on soil respiration and net ecosystem production in maize," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 353-360.
    17. Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Angélica Santos Rabelo de Souza Bahia & Juliana Duarte Messana & Eduardo Festozo Vicente & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2023. "Additive Tannins in Ruminant Nutrition: An Alternative to Achieve Sustainability in Animal Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Bai, Youshuai & Zhang, Hengjia & Jia, Shenghai & Huang, Caixia & Zhao, Xia & Wei, Huiqin & Yang, Shurui & Ma, Yan & Kou, Rui, 2022. "Plastic film mulching combined with sand tube irrigation improved yield, water use efficiency, and fruit quality of jujube in an arid desert area of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    19. Singh, Pritpal & Singh, Gurdeep & Sodhi, G.P.S. & Sharma, Sandeep, 2021. "Energy optimization in wheat establishment following rice residue management with Happy Seeder technology for reduced carbon footprints in north-western India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Rebecca F. Graham & Sam E. Wortman & Cameron M. Pittelkow, 2017. "Comparison of Organic and Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies for Reducing Soil N 2 O Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:briefi:v:14:y:2021:i:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.