IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2025v1p13-22.html

Do Firms In Post-Soviet Economies Suffer More From Corruption? A Comparison Of Post-Soviet And Other Developing Economies

Author

Listed:
  • HALIL D. KAYA

    (NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY)

Abstract

The study examines the socio-economic challenges arising due to corruption in post-Soviet and other developing economies. We use the World Bank’s Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS). We use nonparametric tests to compare bribery in post-Soviet economies and other developing economies. Our results show that firms in post-Soviet countries have to deal with bribery more frequently when compared to firms in other developing economies. This finding holds for all three groups of firms, namely core industry firms, manufacturing firms, and service firms. Then, we differentiate between bribery in different areas which include customs/imports, courts, and taxes. When we compare firms in post-Soviet countries with firms in other developing countries, we find that all types of bribery are more common in post-Soviet countries. This finding holds for core industry firms, manufacturing firms, and service firms. The only exception is the result for service firms in bribery related to courts. For service firms, the frequency of bribery related to courts is not significantly different across post-Soviet and other countries. We conclude that the old habit of using bribery to do business in post-Soviet countries continues. Since corruption harms the economy, we urge policymakers in these countries to take stronger action to combat it.

Suggested Citation

  • Halil D. Kaya, 2025. "Do Firms In Post-Soviet Economies Suffer More From Corruption? A Comparison Of Post-Soviet And Other Developing Economies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 13-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:1:p:13-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2025-01/02_Kaya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastassia Obydenkova & Alexander Libman, 2015. "Understanding the survival of post-Communist corruption in contemporary Russia: the influence of historical legacies," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 304-338, July.
    2. Jakob Svensson, 2003. "Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross Section of Firms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 207-230.
    3. Vartuhí Tonoyan & Robert Strohmeyer & Mohsin Habib & Manfred Perlitz, 2010. "Corruption and Entrepreneurship: How Formal and Informal Institutions Shape Small Firm Behavior in Transition and Mature Market Economies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(5), pages 803-832, September.
    4. Pranab Bardhan, 1997. "Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1320-1346, September.
    5. Wang, Yuanyuan & You, Jing, 2012. "Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 415-433.
    6. Ayaydın, Hasan & Hayaloglu, Pınar, 2014. "The Effect of Corruption on Firm Growth: Evidence from Firms in Turkey," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(5), pages 607-624.
    7. Gary S. Becker & George J. Stigler, 1974. "Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Rajeev K. Goel & Ummad Mazhar & Rati Ram, 2022. "Dimensions of size and corruption perceptions versus corruption experiences by firms in emerging economies," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 46(2), pages 374-396, April.
    9. Hasan Ayaydin & Pinar Hayaloglu, 2014. "The Effect of Corruption on Firm Growth: Evidence from Firms in Turkey," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(5), pages 607-624, May.
    10. Thuy Dieu Nguyen, 2020. "Does firm growth increase corruption? Evidence from an instrumental variable approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 237-256, June.
    11. Raymond Fisman & Sergei Guriev & Carolin Ioramashvili & Alexander Plekhanov, 2024. "Corruption and Firm Growth: Evidence from around the World," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(660), pages 1494-1516.
    12. Jie Bai & Seema Jayachandran & Edmund J Malesky & Benjamin A Olken, 2019. "Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 651-677.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halil D. Kaya, 2024. "Corruption In Eastern Europe And Central Asia: Do Manufacturing Firms Suffer The Most?," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 24-33, August.
    2. Lee, Mina & Mutlu, Canan & Lee, Seung-Hyun, 2023. "Bribery and Firm Growth: Sensemaking in CEE and Post-Soviet Countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    3. Philip Akrofi Atitianti & James Chukwubudom Chikelu, 2021. "Corruption and firm growth: evidence from Nigeria," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Rania Missaoui & Aymen Ajina, 2026. "Firm dynamics in corrupt environments: the case of the BRICS countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-38, February.
    5. Tomasi, Chiara & Le, Quoc Thai & Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Lan, 2025. "Greasing or Grinding? Regulatory context and the productivity effects of corruption: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Chei Bukari & Emm anuel Atta Anaman, 2021. "Corruption and firm innovation: a grease or sand in the wheels of commerce? Evidence from lower-middle and upper-middle income economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 267-302, June.
    7. Phuoc Vu Ha & Michael Frömmel, 2023. "Corruption, business environment, and firm growth in Vietnam," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2512-2529, July.
    8. Colin C. Williams & Abbi M. Kedir, 2016. "The Impacts Of Corruption On Firm Performance: Some Lessons From 40 African Countries," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Colin C. Williams & Alvaro Martinez-Perez, 2016. "Evaluating the impacts of corruption on firm performance in developing economies: an institutional perspective," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 401-422.
    10. Cai, Weixing & Hu, Feng & Xu, Fangming & Zheng, Liyi, 2022. "Anti-corruption campaign and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PA).
    11. Maurizio La Rocca & Tiziana La Rocca & Francesco Fasano & Javier Sanchez-Vidal, 2023. "From the Top Down: Does Corruption Affect Performance?," Papers 2310.20028, arXiv.org.
    12. Lakshmi, Geeta & Saha, Shrabani & Bhattarai, Keshab, 2021. "Does corruption matter for stock markets? The role of heterogeneous institutions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 386-400.
    13. Anh‐Tuan Doan & Bich‐Thanh Truong & Chi‐Cuong Nguyen & Phan‐Tam‐Nhu Nguyen & Hai‐Yen Truong & Anh‐Tuan Le, 2023. "Corruption and corporate leverage in an emerging economy: The role of economic freedom," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 599-629, June.
    14. Bassetti, Thomas & Dal Maso, Lorenzo & Lattanzi, Nicola, 2015. "Family businesses in Eastern European countries: How informal payments affect exports," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 219-233.
    15. Brzić, Barbara & Dabić, Marina & Kukura, Frane & Podobnik, Boris, 2021. "The effects of corruption and the fraction of private ownership on the productivity of telecommunication companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. World Bank, 2021. "Mozambique - Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 37525, The World Bank Group.
    17. Clarke, George R. G. & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2004. "Privatization, competition, and corruption: how characteristics of bribe takers and payers affect bribes to utilities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 2067-2097, August.
    18. Du, Qingjie & Heo, Yuna, 2022. "Political corruption, Dodd–Frank whistleblowing, and corporate investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Abhijit Banerjee & Rema Hanna, 2012. "Corruption [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
      • Hanna, Rema N. & Mullainathan, Sendhil & Banerjee, Abhijit, 2012. "Corruption," Scholarly Articles 8830779, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
      • Banerjee, Abhijit & Hanna, Rema & Mullainathan, Sendhil, 2012. "Corruption," Working Paper Series rwp12-023, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
      • Abhijit Banerjee & Rema Hanna & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2012. "Corruption," Working Papers id:4952, eSocialSciences.
      • Abhijit Banerjee & Sendhil Mullainathan & Rema Hanna, 2012. "Corruption," NBER Working Papers 17968, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Schumacher, Ingmar, 2013. "Political stability, corruption and trust in politicians," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 359-369.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2025:v:1:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.