IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2022v1p91-96.html

Theoretical Elements Regarding The Management Of A Dynamic Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • MADALINA-GABRIELA ANGHEL

    (ARTIFEX UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST)

  • CONSTANTIN ANGHELACHE

    (BUCHAREST UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES / ARTIFEX UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST)

  • STEFAN VIRGIL IACOB

    (ARTIFEX UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST)

Abstract

The placing of the portfolios on the capital market is an interesting operation, but also complicated. The investor wants to ensure that the placement of his assets on the capital market at a certain time must result in a return, if possible, as high as possible. In this sense, the problem of analyzing and tracking the moments in which this placement is made is particularly important. The investor’s decisions are important, not only for them, but also for how they can influence and determine certain market developments. Internationally, the capital markets are somewhat interdependent as there are no total restrictions on placing asset portfolios on any capital market. In this article, we aimed to highlight the way in which it is necessary to achieve an efficient management in the dynamics of placing portfolios on the capital market. From this point of view, we used a methodology through which we first set out the opinions of some great specialists domestically and internationally, in connection with this problem of dynamic portfolio management. We used data series, logical interpretations, specific indicators to extract a certain essence in terms of dynamic portfolio management. The dynamic portfolio is a permanent concern of mutual fund managers, to materialize the strategy of obtaining short-term satisfactory earnings, on the one hand, and to achieve a strategy that produces high long-term returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Madalina-Gabriela Anghel & Constantin Anghelache & Stefan Virgil Iacob, 2022. "Theoretical Elements Regarding The Management Of A Dynamic Portfolio," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 91-96, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2022:v:1:p:91-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2022-01/10_Anghel.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. Okhrimenko & I. Manaenko, 2014. "Determinants Of Investment Support: Principles, Mechanisms, Efficiency," Economics of Development, Kharkiv National University of Economics, vol. 69(1), pages 34-40.
    2. Alexandre Adam & Mohamed Houkari & Jean-Paul Laurent, 2008. "Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection," Post-Print hal-03676385, HAL.
    3. Adam, Alexandre & Houkari, Mohamed & Laurent, Jean-Paul, 2008. "Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1870-1882, September.
    4. Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL & Gyorgy BODO & Okwiet BARTEK, 2016. "Model of Static Portfolio Choices," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 49-53, January.
    5. Black, Fischer, 1972. "Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(3), pages 444-455, July.
    6. Omesh Kini & Shehzad Mian & Michael Rebello & Anand Venkateswaran, 2009. "On the Structure of Analyst Research Portfolios and Forecast Accuracy," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(4), pages 867-909, September.
    7. Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen & Peter Reinhard Hansen & Asger Lunde & Neil Shephard, 2008. "Designing Realized Kernels to Measure the ex post Variation of Equity Prices in the Presence of Noise," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(6), pages 1481-1536, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilles Boevi Koumou, 2020. "Diversification and portfolio theory: a review," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 267-312, September.
    2. Farsam Misagh, 2016. "On Shift-Dependent Cumulative Entropy Measures," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-8, June.
    3. Conlon, Thomas & Cotter, John, 2013. "Downside risk and the energy hedger's horizon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 371-379.
    4. Henry Penikas, 2014. "Investment portfolio risk modelling based on hierarchical copulas," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 35(3), pages 18-38.
    5. Wentao Hu & Cuixia Chen & Yufeng Shi & Ze Chen, 2022. "A Tail Measure With Variable Risk Tolerance: Application in Dynamic Portfolio Insurance Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 831-874, June.
    6. Martin Herdegen & Nazem Khan, 2022. "Mean‐ρ$\rho$ portfolio selection and ρ$\rho$‐arbitrage for coherent risk measures," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 226-272, January.
    7. Wegener, Christian & von Nitzsch, Rüdiger & Cengiz, Cetin, 2010. "An advanced perspective on the predictability in hedge fund returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2694-2708, November.
    8. D'avid Csercsik & Anne Neumann, 2022. "Solidarity in natural gas storage: A potential allocation mechanism of stored quantities among several players during times of crisis," Papers 2209.05089, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    9. H. Fink & S. Geissel & J. Herbinger & F. T. Seifried, 2019. "Portfolio Optimization with Optimal Expected Utility Risk Measures," Working Paper Series 2019-07, University of Trier, Research Group Quantitative Finance and Risk Analysis.
    10. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang, 2014. "Decision making with Conditional Value-at-Risk and spectral risk measures: The problem of comparative risk aversion," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100615, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. El Kalak, Izidin & Azevedo, Alcino & Hudson, Robert, 2016. "Reviewing the hedge funds literature I: Hedge funds and hedge funds' managerial characteristics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 85-97.
    12. S. Geissel & H. Graf & J. Herbinger & F. T. Seifried, 2022. "Portfolio optimization with optimal expected utility risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(1), pages 59-77, February.
    13. Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Ștefan Virgil IACOB & Gabriel-Ștefan DUMBRAVĂ & Marius POPOVICI, 2019. "Dynamic models used in analysis capital and population," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(621), W), pages 149-162, Winter.
    14. Omid Momen & Akbar Esfahanipour & Abbas Seifi, 2020. "A robust behavioral portfolio selection: model with investor attitudes and biases," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 427-446, March.
    15. Jing Li & Mingxin Xu, 2013. "Optimal Dynamic Portfolio with Mean-CVaR Criterion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-29, November.
    16. Matyska, Branka, 2021. "Salience, systemic risk and spectral risk measures as capital requirements," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Sungchul Hong & Jong-June Jeon, 2023. "Uniform Pessimistic Risk and its Optimal Portfolio," Papers 2303.07158, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    18. Weiping Wu & Yu Lin & Jianjun Gao & Ke Zhou, 2023. "Mean-variance hybrid portfolio optimization with quantile-based risk measure," Papers 2303.15830, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    19. Taras Bodnar & Mathias Lindholm & Erik Thorsén & Joanna Tyrcha, 2021. "Quantile-based optimal portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 299-324, July.
    20. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang & Rischau, Robert, 2018. "Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 707-716.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2022:v:1:p:91-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.