IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2009v2p7-20.html

From globalization to fragmentation – a new beginning in the international affaires

Author

Listed:
  • Liviu Neamtu
  • Adina Claudia Neamtu

    (Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, Romania)

Abstract

Registration of regional and local, or even traditional brands, are becoming in today's an increasingly met phenomenon on international market in small and midsize companies struggle to protect certain markets and products. While large companies that hold independent or group trademarks and brands pursuing gradual transition of that trademarks from the level of global brands to the levels of technological brands, regional brands or positioned trademark to cover limited parts of the market to sell more effectively. In this way we find a fierce battle between the trend of globalization of markets and the fragmentation of the product supply on the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Liviu Neamtu & Adina Claudia Neamtu, 2009. "From globalization to fragmentation – a new beginning in the international affaires," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 7-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2009:v:2:p:7-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2009-02/1_LIVIU_NEAMTU.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald W. Jones, 2000. "Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026210086x, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul A. Samuelson, 2001. "A Ricardo-Sraffa Paradigm Comparing Gains from Trade in Inputs and Finished Goods," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(4), pages 1204-1214, December.
    2. Pol Antràs & Robert W. Staiger, 2012. "Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3140-3183, December.
    3. Marek Rojíček, 2010. "Konkurenceschopnost obchodu ČR v procesu globalizace [Competitiveness of the Trade of the Czech Republic in the Process of Globalisation]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(2), pages 147-165.
    4. Pol Antràs & Elhanan Helpman, 2006. "Contractual Frictions and Global Sourcing," NBER Working Papers 12747, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Witada Anukoonwattaka, 2007. "Outsourcing and International Production of a Multinational: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence from Toyota, Thailand," DEGIT Conference Papers c012_045, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    6. Damares Lopes Afonso & Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli & Suzana Quinet de Andrade Bastos, 2022. "South–South trade: An analysis of trade integration in the G‐77," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1430-1452, October.
    7. Richard Pomfret & Richard Pomfret, 2014. "Expanding the Division of Labour: Trade Costs and Supply Chains in the Global Economy," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(3), pages 220-241, November.
    8. F. Gerard Adams & Byron Gangnes & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2006. "Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China's Competitiveness," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 95-122, February.
    9. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    10. Zhihao Yu, 2003. "IT, Production Specialization, and Division of Labor: A Smith-Ricardo Model of International Trade," Carleton Economic Papers 03-06, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    11. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Tala Talgaswatta & Omer Majeed, 2017. "Global production sharing: Exploring Australia's competitive edge," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(10), pages 2172-2192, October.
    12. Carlos Felipe Jaramillo & Daniel Lederman & Maurizio Bussolo & David Gould & Andrew Mason, 2006. "Challenges of CAFTA : Maximizing the Benefits for Central America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7127, April.
    13. Laike Yang, 2014. "Production Sharing in East Asia: China’s Position, Trade Pattern and Technology upgrading," Competence Centre on Money, Trade, Finance and Development 1407, Hochschule fuer Technik und Wirtschaft, Berlin.
    14. Götz Zeddies, 2011. "Determinants of international fragmentation of production in European Union," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 511-537, November.
    15. Kwok Tong Soo, 2014. "The gains from trade in intermediate goods," Working Papers 63719205, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    16. Antonis Adam & Thomas Moutos, 2002. "The Political Economy of EU Enlargement: Or, Why Japan is not a Candidate Country?," CESifo Working Paper Series 704, CESifo.
    17. SALMON, Pierre & BRETON, Albert, 2005. "Bijural services as factors of production," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2005-01, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    18. Karolina Ekholm & Rikard Forslid & James R. Markusen, 2021. "Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: BROADENING TRADE THEORY Incorporating Market Realities into Traditional Models, chapter 6, pages 111-130, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. ASEAN Secretariat & World Bank, 2015. "ASEAN Services Integration Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 22919, The World Bank Group.
    20. Hideo Sato, 2024. "An input trade model with Keynesian unemployment: Bridging a gap between trade theory and international Input–Output analysis," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 282-305, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2009:v:2:p:7-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.