IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v50y2004i1id5163-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data gathering for science and research

Author

Listed:
  • J. Vaníček

    (Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Reasoning and argumentation in empirical sciences and research is based on row data and the intermediate and final structures, calculations etc., derived from the raw data. In this contribution, the short survey of the different techniques to gather raw data is given. The gain of the paper should consist in the manifestation of explicit limitation of usage this data for further utilization and deductions depending on the scaling type and validity problems during data gathering.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Vaníček, 2004. "Data gathering for science and research," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(1), pages 29-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:50:y:2004:i:1:id:5163-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/5163-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5163-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5163-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/5163-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen M. Hufnagel & Christopher Conca, 1994. "User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 48-73, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2019. "Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big Brother effect’ matter?," Post-Print hal-03217977, HAL.
    2. France Belanger & Rosann Webb Collins & Paul H. Cheney, 2001. "Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 155-176, June.
    3. Jahyun Goo, 2010. "Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 185-205, April.
    4. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    5. Liao, Kun & Deng, Xiaodong & Marsillac, Erika, 2013. "Factors that influence Chinese automotive suppliers’ mass customization capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 25-36.
    6. Pluyter, J.R., 2012. "Designing immersive surgical training against information technology-related overload in the operating room," Other publications TiSEM d48c5727-92fd-41b1-be5d-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Lei Zhu & Izak Benbasat & Zhenhui Jiang, 2010. "Let's Shop Online Together: An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Online Shopping Support," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 872-891, December.
    8. Shiyong Wu & Wenxin Chen & Wei Chen & Wen Zheng, 2022. "Effects of Cultural Intelligence and Imposter Syndrome on School Belonging through Academic Resilience among University Students with Vocational Backgrounds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Teo, T. S. H. & King, W. R., 1997. "An assessment of perceptual differences between informants in information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 557-566, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:50:y:2004:i:1:id:5163-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.