IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bum/cactus/v3y2021i2p6-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception Of Romanian Tourists On The Attractiveness Of The Industrial Heritage. Case Study: Municipality Of Cluj-Napoca

Author

Listed:
  • Florentina-Cristina Merciu

    (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Interdisciplinary Center of Advanced Research on Territorial Dynamics, Romania)

  • Ana Valeria Stoican

    (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Interdisciplinary Center of Advanced Research on Territorial Dynamics, Romania)

  • Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Vasiloiu

    (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Interdisciplinary Center of Advanced Research on Territorial Dynamics, Romania)

Abstract

The radical changes generated by the process of industrial restructuring and accelerated urban development have brought to the center of attention the industrial heritage as a valuable cultural resource, but at the same time vulnerable. Regeneration projects focused on the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage elements take many forms, from economic, residential to cultural conversions, the latter being correlated with the use of industrial buildings as tourist attractions. The purpose of this study is to identify the interest of Romanian tourists to practice industrial tourism, based on assessing the degree of knowledge and their desire to visit industrial monuments. For this purpose, an online questionnaire was applied, the results of which were statistically interpreted using the Covariance Analysis (ANACOVA). The main results of the study reflect the fact that there is a low share of Romanian tourists who know the significance of the concept of industrial heritage and who consider it attractive. Selecting 5 representative industrial buildings for the Municipality of Cluj-Napoca selected as a case study, only a third of the respondents stated that they know them. However, there is a relatively high interest of respondents to visit industrial monuments, mentioning as main motivations: the age of the buildings, the specific architecture, and curiosity or even form of reuse of industrial monuments. Almost half of the respondents stated that they would introduce industrial buildings in their travel itineraries if they were better promoted. The main conclusion of the study is that industrial tourism is not sufficiently promoted at national level.

Suggested Citation

  • Florentina-Cristina Merciu & Ana Valeria Stoican & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Ana-Maria Vasiloiu, 2021. "The Perception Of Romanian Tourists On The Attractiveness Of The Industrial Heritage. Case Study: Municipality Of Cluj-Napoca," Cactus - The tourism journal for research, education, culture and soul, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 6-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:bum:cactus:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:6-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cactus-journal-of-tourism.ase.ro/Pdf/vol_3_2/Merciu_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Wu, Tsung-Chiung (Emily) & Xie, Philip Feifan & Tsai, Miao-Chi, 2015. "Perceptions of attractiveness for salt heritage tourism: A tourist perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 201-209.
    3. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Mariusz Szubert & Witold Warcholik & Michał Żemła, 2021. "The Influence of Elements of Cultural Heritage on the Image of Destinations, Using Four Polish Cities as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Xosé Somoza-Medina & Obdulia Monteserín-Abella, 2021. "The Sustainability of Industrial Heritage Tourism Far from the Axes of Economic Development in Europe: Two Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Claver & Amabel García-Domínguez & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2021. "Collaborative Cataloging of Spanish Industrial Heritage Assets through Teaching in Project Management Subjects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Zhengyuan Zhao & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Development Path of Industrial Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of Kitakyushu (Japan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Rui Han & Shiqi Yang, 2023. "A Study on Industrial Heritage Renewal Strategy Based on Hybrid Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    4. Miloš Aranđelović & Aleksandar Videnović & Nebojša Gadžić & Dušan Tomanović, 2022. "Repurposing and the Impact of New Facilities on the Potential Presentation of Industrial Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Mi Yan & Qingmiao Li & Jiazhen Zhang, 2023. "Rethinking Industrial Heritage Tourism Resources in the EU: A Spatial Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-32, July.
    6. Aleksandra Kuzior & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Dariusz Krawczyk, 2021. "Post-Industrial Tourism as a Driver of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Ines Grigorescu & Cristina Dumitrică & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Costin Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Urban Development and the (Re)use of the Communist-Built Industrial and Agricultural Sites after 1990. The Showcase of Bucharest–Ilfov Development Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Tomas Kačerauskas, 2023. "Disinterestedness in the Creative Economy: The Case of the MO Museum in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Carlo Angelo Maria Chiodi & Rossella De Lucia & Carlo Giunchi & Paolo Molinari, 2025. "Looking for a Balance Between Memories, Patrimonialization, and Tourism: Sustainable Approaches to Industrial Heritage Regeneration in Northwestern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-32, January.
    10. Rybár Pavol & Hronček Pavel & Tometzová Dana & Domaracká Lucia & Jesenský Miloš, 2017. "Underground quarries their possible use for mining tourism purposes – Slovak perspectives on the example of the underground stone quarry of Veľká Stráň," Acta Geoturistica, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 87-107, December.
    11. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    13. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    14. Xiaolu Wu & Li Yu & Haosen Fang & Jing Wu, 2021. "Research on the Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Public Participation—A Case Study of Northern Mining Area of Pingdingshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Marta Bottero & Giulia Datola & Daniele Fazzari & Roberta Ingaramo, 2022. "Re-Thinking Detroit: A Multicriteria-Based Approach for Adaptive Reuse for the Corktown District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Marta Bottero & Caterina Caprioli & Giancarlo Cotella & Marco Santangelo, 2019. "Sustainable Cities: A Reflection on Potentialities and Limits based on Existing Eco-Districts in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Gabriele Battista & Emanuele de Lieto Vollaro & Andrea Vallati & Roberto de Lieto Vollaro, 2023. "Technical–Financial Feasibility Study of a Micro-Cogeneration System in the Buildings in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Adam Kozień, 2021. "The Principle of Sustainable Development as the Basis for Weighing the Public Interest and Individual Interest in the Scope of the Cultural Heritage Protection Law in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2020. "A Dynamic Model for the Financial Sustainability of the Restoration Sponsorship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Akawut Jansom & Sydney Chinchanachokchai, 2022. "Rethinking Sustainable Tourism Management: Learning from the COVID-19 Pandemic to Co-Create Future of Krabi Tourism, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial tourism; architectural value; urban regeneration; cultural conversion; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • Z - Other Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bum:cactus:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:6-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Bulin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.