IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/revmkt/v1y2003i1p28n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring National Brands' Equity over Store Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Sethuraman Raj

    (Southern Methodist University, rsethura@Mail.Cox.SMU.Edu)

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an approach to measuring the overall brand equity of national brands based on customers reservation price differential and perceived quality differential between national brand and store brand. Our approach draws upon a utility framework and develops an econometric model for measuring national brands equity over store brand and decomposing it into Quality Equity and Non-Quality Equity.. We then employ the approach and estimate brand equity using data on 20 product categories from 132 consumers and explore some demographic and category antecedents. Our research offers several useful insights. First, it suggests that brand equity is a dominant component of consumers willingness to pay a premium for national brands than for store brands. In fact, nearly 80% of the premium that consumers would pay for national brands over store brands can be attributed to brand equity. Second, a significant portion (over 80%) of national brand equity comes from non-quality equity or brand image. Finally, our study identifies several category and consumer characteristics such as advertising, purchase price, income, and age that are significant antecedents of brand equity. The managerial implications of these findings for both national brand manufacturers and retailers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sethuraman Raj, 2003. "Measuring National Brands' Equity over Store Brands," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:1:y:2003:i:1:p:28:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1546-5616.1000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1546-5616.1000
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1546-5616.1000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hökelekli, Gizem & Lamey, Lien & Verboven, Frank, 2017. "Private label line proliferation and private label tier pricing: A new dimension of competition between private labels and national brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 39-52.
    2. Bodur, H. Onur & Tofighi, Maryam & Grohmann, Bianca, 2016. "When Should Private Label Brands Endorse Ethical Attributes?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 204-217.
    3. Jagrook Dawra & Kanupriya Katyal, 2023. "Decoding price promotions: a moderated mediation model of fairness, trust, and deal proneness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 248-265, August.
    4. Sethuraman, Raj & Gielens, Katrijn, 2014. "Determinants of Store Brand Share," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 141-153.
    5. Zhang, Xu & Goddard, Ellen W., 2010. "Analysis of Value-Added Meat Product Choice Behaviour by Canadian Households," Project Report Series 99703, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:revmkt:v:1:y:2003:i:1:p:28:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.