Language Analysis for Peace Science
I assign myself an apparently simple task in this essay. I seek to justify my belief that peace science ought to accommodate substantive analyses grounded in language and logic. Moreover, it should encourage and sustain efforts to develop methodological forms that support such analyses. Our shared intellectual heritage complexifies my task. Owing to our location in the intellectual history of social science, we have each been trained in methodological practices consonant with our mostly positive and behavioral legacies. The success of these practices is beyond dispute. They are pertinent to a wide range of questions of interest to peace scientists. It thus befalls to me to show that language modeling would widen that range. But I must first show that questions exist for which positive and behavioral methods are less well-suited than language methods. Once I complete these tasks, I illustrate my meaning by describing briefly the language methods I have used in my empirical work.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 8 (2002)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/peps|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:8:y:2002:i:3:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.