IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v63y2012i1p385-402n23.html

Wahrheit und Gewissheit; Klimaschutz und Politik / Truth and Certainty; Stabilizing the Climate and Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Weede Erich

Abstract

The currently dominant view in climate research is that mankind is endangered by climate change. As there are some different and less disquieting voices in climate research, as - even assuming the validity of the dominant view - the currently advocated means to mitigate climate change might be very costly or inefficient or incompatible with other values like human freedom, the role of wide agreement or consent in human thinking in general and in science in particular is discussed. The idea that the consent of experts can ever establish certainty about possession of the truth is rejected. Human knowledge always remains conjectural and subject to later revision. Too much closeness between the practitioners of science and politics is a threat instead of a promise. To counter this threat some social norms have to be observed and the institutional prerequisites for protecting the autonomy of science have to be established. Not only in markets, but in the sciences, too, competition is a discovery procedure. The task of science should never be an early consensus and the suppression of criticism and doubts. Instead it must remain organized scepticism and finding incompatibilities between widely accepted policy goals - even if doing so makes governance more difficult.

Suggested Citation

  • Weede Erich, 2012. "Wahrheit und Gewissheit; Klimaschutz und Politik / Truth and Certainty; Stabilizing the Climate and Politics," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 385-402, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:385-402:n:23
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2012-0123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2012-0123
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2012-0123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weede, Erich, 2012. "Freiheit und Verantwortung, Aufstieg und Niedergang," Beiträge zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 127, number urn:isbn:9783161518331, May.
    2. Bryan Caplan, 2007. "Introduction to The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies," Introductory Chapters, in: The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies, Princeton University Press.
    3. Weede, Erich, 2012. "Freiheit und Verantwortung, Aufstieg und Niedergang," Beiträge zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 127, number urn:isbn:9783161520914, May.
    4. Erich Weede, 2006. "Economic Freedom and Development: New Calculations and Interpretations," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 26(3), pages 511-524, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weede Erich, 2015. "Von Hayek lernen: Wissen und Freiheit, Recht und Gesetzgebung / Learning from Hayek: Knowledge and Liberty, Law and Legislation," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 81-96, January.
    2. Peter Bernholz, 2013. "The Slow and Hidden Road to Serfdom," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(02), pages 61-74, August.
    3. Weede Erich, 2012. "Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum chinesischen Wunder / Some Supplementary Comments on the Chinese Miracle," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 129-134, January.
    4. Anthony J. Evans, 2016. "The unintended consequences of easy money: How access to finance impedes entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 233-252, September.
    5. Piątek, Dawid & Sarzec, Katarzyna, . "Państwo a dobrobyt ekonomiczny - między wolnością a przymusem," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2009(5-6).
    6. Dwight R. Lee & Ryan H. Murphy, 2017. "An expressive voting model of anger, hatred, harm and shame," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 307-323, December.
    7. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and Institutions: A Bidirectional Relationship," Working Paper Series 1153, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 05 May 2017.
    8. repec:jpe:journl:1323 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Timothy Johnson, 2015. "Reciprocity as a Foundation of Financial Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 43-67, September.
    10. Natalia Mishagina & Claude Montmarquette, 2018. "The Demand for Economic Policies, Beliefs, and Willingness-to-Pay: The Case of the Minimum Wage Policy in Quebec," CIRANO Project Reports 2018rp-14, CIRANO.
    11. Shayo, Moses & Harel, Alon, 2012. "Non-consequentialist voting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 299-313.
    12. Theiss Bendixen, 2020. "How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Erich Weede, 2011. "The Capitalist Peace," Chapters, in: Christopher J. Coyne & Rachel L. Mathers (ed.), The Handbook on the Political Economy of War, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Sinclair Davidson, 2018. "Populism and Fiscal Illusion," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 51(3), pages 418-425, September.
    15. Kirchgässner, Gebhard, 2012. "Sanfter Paternalismus, meritorische Güter, und der normative Individualismus," Economics Working Paper Series 1217, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    16. Alexander William Salter, 2016. "Post-Cameralist Governance: Towards a Robust Political Economy of Bureaucracy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 294-308, October.
    17. Max Haller & Anja Eder & Erwin Stolz, 2016. "Ethnic Stratification and Patterns of Income Inequality Around the World: A Cross-National Comparison of 123 Countries, Based on a New Index of Historic Ethnic Exploitation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1047-1084, September.
    18. Peters B., 2009. "The Two Futures of Governing: Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 2(1), pages 7-24, July.
    19. Rode, Martin & Sáenz de Viteri, Andrea, 2018. "Expressive attitudes to compensation: The case of globalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 42-55.
    20. Dwight R. Lee & J. R. Clark, 2018. "Can behavioral economists improve economic rationality?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 23-40, January.
    21. repec:jpe:journl:985 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Romer, David, 2012. "What Have We Learned about Fiscal Policy from the Crisis?," MIT Press Book Chapters, in: Blanchard, Olivier J. & Romer, David & Spence, Michael & Stiglitz, Joseph E. (ed.), In the Wake of the Crisis: Leading Economists Reassess Economic Policy, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 57-66, The MIT Press.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:385-402:n:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.