IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jeehcn/v7y1996i4n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inconsistency of Liberal Compromises

Author

Listed:
  • Radnitzky Gerard

    (University of Trier, Germany)

Abstract

Les principaux aspects de lEtat Providence sont identifiés. Parce que les mêmes individus et les mêmes couches de la population bénéficient de la redistribution en même temps quils sont frappés dimpôts, la société malaxée est une expression qui convient mieux aux démocraties modernes que ne lest lEtat Providence. Le développement historique du phénomène est retracé. (Le Royaume social prussien est pris comme archétype et comme point de départ). Le bismarckisme marque le tournant de lidée originelle avec son image optimiste de lhomme sous sa forme moderne de la société malaxée. Lassistance sociale est un phénomène induit par la démocratie. Le Léviathan se révèle être une vache à lait ; il sétend de plus en plus et devient incroyablement gourmand. Lexplication de lémergence de la société malaxée met laccent sur des facteurs intellectuels, en particulier sur la théorie politique du libéralisme. Le déclin du libéralisme peut être en partie expliqué par le caractère dissolu du libéralisme classique et de ses successeurs. Larticle recherche la manière de renforcer le libéralisme. Lébauche du libéralisme strict par Jasay est esquissée et analysée. Elle fournit le fondement dun système de règles morales déontologiques. Un tel système est-il indispensable pour un ordre social compatible avec lidée dune société libre ? Ou est-ce que la démocratie peut résoudre le problème ? Cette question mène à une analyse de la dynamique de la méthode démocratique du choix collectif. Les remèdes susceptibles de favoriser lémergence dune société moins coercitive sont examinés.Central features of the welfare state are described. Since most redistribution now benefits the same persons and strata as it taxes, Churning Society is a more telling label for modern democracies than is the welfare state. The historical development of the phenomenon is sketched. (The Prussian Social Kingdom is taken as the archetype and origin. Bismarckism marks the turning of the original idea with its optimistic image of man into the modern form of the churning society. It infected other countries.) Churning society is a democracy-induced phenomenon. Leviathan turns into a Milch Cow; it grows and grows and becomes incredibly voracious. The explanation of the rise of the churning society focuses on the intellectual factors, in particular on the political theory of liberalism. The decline of liberalism can be in part explained by the looseness of classical liberalism and its successors. The article inquires: how can liberalism be strengthened? Jasays design of strict liberalism is outlined and analyzed. It provides the basis of a system of deontological moral rules. Is such a system indispensable for a social order that is compatible with the idea of a free society? Or can democracy solve the problem? This question leads to an analysis of the dynamics of the democratic method of collective choice. Remedies are discussed that might help the emergence of a less unfree society.

Suggested Citation

  • Radnitzky Gerard, 1996. "The Inconsistency of Liberal Compromises," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 1-51, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:7:y:1996:i:4:n:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jeeh.1996.7.4/jeeh.1996.7.4.1182/jeeh.1996.7.4.1182.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brunner, Karl, 1987. "The Perception of Man and the Conception of Society: Two Approaches to Understanding Society," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 367-388, July.
    2. Frey, Bruno S & Buhofer, Heinz, 1988. "Prisoners and Property Rights," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 19-46, April.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:237786 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:7:y:1996:i:4:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.