IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbvela/v17y2022i1p65-100n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Valuation of Private Held Companies: Valuation Multiples in the Czech Brewing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Drábek Michal

    (Mendel University in Brno, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This article focuses on the topic of the relative valuation from the perspective of non-publicly traded companies and the determination of industry multiples allowing the subsequent application of this approach to specific industries. I chose the Czech brewing industry as the target industry, represented by the 50 most important entities (covering more than 99% of the industry’s turnover). Due to the fact that no market value data are available for this type of company, I first used an income valuation approach – the discounted cash flow (DCF) method to assess the market value of each company in the sample. I then quantified valuation multiples of P/E, EV/EBIT, EV/EBITDA, P/S, EV/S, P/BV, and EV/IC for each company, from which I determined industry statistics. I verified their suitability for use in the relative valuation approach and compared them with the results of existing studies on the most commonly used valuation approaches in the Czech Republic. Furthermore, I compared my own calculations of industry multiples for non-publicly traded companies with available data on industry multiples of publicly-traded companies in the brewing industry across Europe. The results of the comparison show that these multiples are on average lower for non-publicly traded companies than for listed companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Drábek Michal, 2022. "Relative Valuation of Private Held Companies: Valuation Multiples in the Czech Brewing Industry," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 65-100, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:65-100:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2021-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2021-0023
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbvela-2021-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Efthimios Demirakos & Norman Strong & Martin Walker, 2010. "Does Valuation Model Choice Affect Target Price Accuracy?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 35-72.
    2. Jennergren, L. Peter, 2008. "Continuing value in firm valuation by the discounted cash flow model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1548-1563, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Drabek & Daniel Pastorek, 2023. "The impact of ownership structure on the market value of companies in response to COVID-19," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2023-87, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vidal-Garcia Raül & Ribal Javier, 2019. "Terminal Value in SMEs: Testing the Multiple EV/EBITDA Approach," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Gülcan Erkilet & Gerrit Janke & Rainer Kasperzak, 2022. "How valuation approach choice affects financial analysts’ target price accuracy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(5), pages 741-779, July.
    3. Samie Ahmed Sayed & Latha Sreeram, 2017. "Factors Mitigating Firm-specific Information Asymmetry and Target Price Accuracy in India," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 42(4), pages 220-233, December.
    4. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, 2018. "How do turbulent sectoral conditions sector influence the value of coal mining enterprises? Perspectives from the Central-Eastern Europe coal mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 103-112.
    5. Anesten, Sebastian & Möller, Niclas & Skogsvik, Kenth, 2015. "The Accuracy of Parsimonious Equity Valuation Models - Empirical tests of the Dividend Discount, Residual Income and Abnormal Earnings Growth model," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2015:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    6. Peter F. Pope & Tong Wang, 2023. "Analyst ability and research effort: non-EPS forecast provision as a research quality signal," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1263-1315, September.
    7. Markus Buxbaum & Wolfgang Schultze & Samuel L. Tiras, 2023. "Do analysts’ target prices stabilize the stock market?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 763-816, October.
    8. Peter R. Joos & Joseph D. Piotroski, 2017. "The best of all possible worlds: unraveling target price optimism using analysts’ scenario-based valuations," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1492-1540, December.
    9. Peter Clarkson & Alexander Nekrasov & Andreas Simon & Irene Tutticci, 2020. "Target price forecasts: The roles of the 52‐week high price and recent investor sentiment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(9-10), pages 1365-1399, October.
    10. Samie Ahmed Sayed, 2015. "Should Analysts Go by the Book? Valuation Models and Target Price Accuracy in an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5), pages 832-844, October.
    11. Jennergren L. Peter, 2013. "Firm Valuation with Bankruptcy Risk," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-41, October.
    12. Chlomou, Grigoria & Demirakos, Efthimios, 2020. "How do financial analysts implement the Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) valuation framework?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Elisa Cavezzali & Ugo Rigoni, 2013. "Financial Analysts' Forecast Accuracy: Do valuation methods matter?," Working Papers 9, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    14. Jennergren L. Peter, 2011. "Approximate Firm Valuation with Operating Leases," Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Syed Babar Ali & Manzoor A.Khalidi, 2020. "Valuation of Equity Securities, Private Firms, and Startups," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 125-140.
    16. Dargenidou, Christina & Jackson, Richard H.G. & Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & Tsoligkas, Fanis, 2021. "Capitalisation of R&D and the informativeness of stock prices: Pre- and post-IFRS evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    17. Ahmed Bouteska & Mehdi Mili, 2022. "Does corporate governance affect financial analysts’ stock recommendations, target prices accuracy and earnings forecast characteristics? An empirical investigation of US companies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2125-2171, October.
    18. Bingxu Fang & Ole-Kristian Hope, 2021. "Analyst teams," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 425-467, June.
    19. Corredor, Pilar & Ferrer, Elena & Santamaria, Rafael, 2019. "The role of sentiment and stock characteristics in the translation of analysts’ forecasts into recommendations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 252-272.
    20. Hyongmook Cheong & Boyoung Kim & Ivan Ureta Vaquero, 2023. "A Data Valuation Model to Estimate the Investment Value of Platform Companies: Based on Discounted Cash Flow," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business valuation; relative valuation; DCF; industry multiples; brewing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:17:y:2022:i:1:p:65-100:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.