IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v6y2010i1n24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simple Nonparametric Confidence Regions for the Evaluation of Continuous-Scale Diagnostic Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Adimari Gianfranco

    (University of Padua)

  • Chiogna Monica

    (University of Padua)

Abstract

The evaluation of the ability of a diagnostic test to separate diseased subjects from non-diseased subjects is a crucial issue in modern medicine. The accuracy of a continuous-scale test at a chosen cut-off level can be measured by its sensitivity and specificity, i.e. by the probabilities that the test correctly identifies the diseased and non-diseased subjects, respectively.In practice, sensitivity and specificity of the test are unknown. Moreover, which cut-off level to use is also generally unknown in that no preliminary indications driving its choice could be available.In this paper, we address the problem of making joint inference on pairs of quantities defining accuracy of a diagnostic test, in particular, when one of the two quantities is the cut-off level. We propose a technique based on an empirical likelihood statistic that allows, within a unified framework, to build bivariate confidence regions for the pair (sensitivity, cut-off level) at a fixed value of specificity as well as for the pair (specificity, cut-off level) at a fixed value of sensitivity or the pair (sensitivity, specificity) at a fixed cut-off value.A simulation study is carried out to assess the finite-sample accuracy of the method. Moreover, we apply the method to two real examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Adimari Gianfranco & Chiogna Monica, 2010. "Simple Nonparametric Confidence Regions for the Evaluation of Continuous-Scale Diagnostic Tests," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:24
    DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1256
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1557-4679.1256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Tianxi Cai, 2004. "The Analysis of Placement Values for Evaluating Discriminatory Measures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 528-535, June.
    2. Gengsheng Qin & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2006. "Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Area under the ROC Curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 613-622, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yin, Jingjing & Tian, Lili, 2014. "Joint inference about sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point associated with Youden index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xiwei & Vexler, Albert & Markatou, Marianthi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval estimation of best linear combinations of biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 186-198.
    2. Wang, Suohong & Zhang, Biao, 2014. "Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for AUC under a density ratio model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 101-115.
    3. Soutik Ghosal & Zhen Chen, 2022. "Discriminatory Capacity of Prenatal Ultrasound Measures for Large-for-Gestational-Age Birth: A Bayesian Approach to ROC Analysis Using Placement Values," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Wan, Shuwen, 2012. "An empirical likelihood confidence interval for the volume under ROC surface," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(7), pages 1463-1467.
    5. Elisa–María Molanes-López & Ricardo Cao, 2008. "Relative density estimation for left truncated and right censored data," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 693-720.
    6. Holly Janes & Gary Longton & Margaret S. Pepe, 2009. "Accommodating covariates in receiver operating characteristic analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(1), pages 17-39, March.
    7. Margaret S. Pepe & Gary Longton & Holly Janes, 2009. "Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Chiang, Chin-Tsang & Chiu, Chih-Heng, 2012. "Nonparametric and semiparametric optimal transformations of markers," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 124-141, January.
    9. Tianxi Cai & Yingye Zheng, 2007. "Model Checking for ROC Regression Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 152-163, March.
    10. Gengsheng Qin & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2006. "Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Area under the ROC Curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 613-622, June.
    11. Letón, Emilio & Molanes, Elisa M., 2009. "Adjusted empirical likelihood estimation of the youden index and associated threshold for the bigamma model," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws091907, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    12. Varron, Davit, 2016. "Empirical likelihood confidence tubes for functional parameters in plug-in estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 100-118.
    13. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2009. "A Parametric ROC Model-Based Approach for Evaluating the Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Case–Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1133-1144, December.
    14. Rodríguez-Álvarez, María Xosé & Roca-Pardiñas, Javier & Cadarso-Suárez, Carmen, 2011. "A new flexible direct ROC regression model: Application to the detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3257-3270, December.
    15. Yuan, Ao & He, Wenqing & Wang, Binhuan & Qin, Gengsheng, 2012. "U-statistic with side information," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 20-38.
    16. Eleni Verykouki & Christos T. Nakas, 2023. "Adaptations on the Use of p -Values for Statistical Inference: An Interpretation of Messages from Recent Public Discussions," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Yuyin Shi & Bing Liu & Gengsheng Qin, 2020. "Influence function-based empirical likelihood and generalized confidence intervals for the Lorenz curve," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(3), pages 427-446, September.
    18. Rodríguez-Álvarez, María Xosé & Tahoces, Pablo G. & Cadarso-Suárez, Carmen & Lado, María José, 2011. "Comparative study of ROC regression techniques--Applications for the computer-aided diagnostic system in breast cancer detection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 888-902, January.
    19. Longlong Huang & Karen Kopciuk & Xuewen Lu, 2018. "Smoothed Jackknife Empirical Likelihood for Weighted Rank Regression with Censored Data," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 48-67, April.
    20. Rebecca Graziani & Michele Guindani & Peter F. Thall, 2015. "Bayesian nonparametric estimation of targeted agent effects on biomarker change to predict clinical outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 188-197, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.