IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v12y2017i1p10n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meaningful Work, Worthwhile Life, and Self-Respect: Reexamination of the Rawlsian Perspective on Basic Income in a Property-Owning Democracy: Basic Income Studies Prize Winner for 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Fukuma Satoshi

    (Department of Regional Policy, Takasaki City University of Economics, Takasaki, Japan)

Abstract

As is well known, John Rawls opposes the idea and policy of basic income. However, this paper posits that his view of self-respect and activity could accommodate its implementation. Rawls lists the social basis of self-respect in social primary goods as the most important good, but does not assume that it is derived from wage labor alone. It appears that his theory of justice aims to criticize the work-centered (wage-labor) society and to overcome it. Besides, as Rawls desires, for our work to be meaningful and our life worthwhile, we should institutionalize basic income because it can improve workers’ bargaining power and their attitude toward work, in addition to enhancing their leisure time. In this paper, by considering the normative relationship between meaningful work, worthwhile life, and self-respect from a Rawlsian perspective, I inquire into the potential of basic income in his well-ordered society.

Suggested Citation

  • Fukuma Satoshi, 2017. "Meaningful Work, Worthwhile Life, and Self-Respect: Reexamination of the Rawlsian Perspective on Basic Income in a Property-Owning Democracy: Basic Income Studies Prize Winner for 2016," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:10:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/bis-2017-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2017-0011
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bis-2017-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Yeoman, 2014. "Meaningful Work and Workplace Democracy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-37058-7, September.
    2. McKinnon Catriona, 2006. "A Scandalous Proposal: Ethical Attractions of Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-4, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Corazza, 2020. "Power, interest and insecurity: A comparative analysis of workplace dualization and inclusion in Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 153, European Institute, LSE.
    2. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Debucquet, Gervaise & Frémeaux, Sandrine, 2018. "Meaningful work and artistic interventions in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical exploration," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 85, pages 375-385.
    3. Anke Strauß & Alexander Fleischmann, 2020. "Reconceptualising Solidarity in the Social Factory: Cultural Work between Economic Needs and Political Desires," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 109-125, February.
    4. Ariane Berthoin Antal & Gervaise Debucquet & Sandrine Frémeaux, 2018. "Meaningful work and artistic interventions in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical exploration," Post-Print hal-03232781, HAL.
    5. Tae Wan Kim & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2019. "Technological Unemployment, Meaning in Life, Purpose of Business, and the Future of Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 319-337, December.
    6. Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Debucquet, Gervaise & Frémeaux, Sandrine, 2018. "Meaningful work and artistic interventions in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 375-385.
    7. Müller, Monika & Huber, Christian & Messner, Martin, 2019. "Meaningful work at a distance: A case study in a hospital," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 719-729.
    8. Arslan, Ahmad & Ahokangas, Petri & Haapanen, Lauri & Golgeci, Ismail & Tarba, Shlomo Y. & Bazel-Shoham, Ofra, 2022. "Generational differences in organizational leaders: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of work meaningfulness in the Nordic high-tech organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:10:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.