IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bor/iserev/v11y2009i43p53-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aftermarket Performances of Book Building and Fixed Price Offerings on the Istanbul stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Erkin Uzun

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare fixed price and book building IPOs in terms of aftermarket performances. On a sample of 28 IPOs (15 book build and 13 fixed price) from 2004 to 2007, it is found that book built IPOs outperform fixed price IPOs, on the contrary to most of the studies indicating that fixed price offerings are more under priced due to the greater uncertainty. This study lists 4 possible reasons for this discrepancy: i) issuing firms’ and underwriters’ fear of under subscription, ii) decrease in the quality of IPOing firms with fixed price offering, iii) increased press coverage and increased and more favorable research coverage in book building offerings, iv) the possibility of informed investors’ misrepresenting their information in order to get more profit by trading in the aftermarket.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkin Uzun, 2009. "Aftermarket Performances of Book Building and Fixed Price Offerings on the Istanbul stock Exchange," Istanbul Stock Exchange Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 11(43), pages 53-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:bor:iserev:v:11:y:2009:i:43:p:53-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.borsaistanbul.com/datum/imkbdergi/EN/ISE_Review_43.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krigman, Laurie & Shaw, Wayne H. & Womack, Kent L., 2001. "Why do firms switch underwriters?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2-3), pages 245-284, May.
    2. Benveniste, Lawrence M. & Busaba, Walid Y., 1997. "Bookbuilding vs. Fixed Price: An Analysis of Competing Strategies for Marketing IPOs," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(4), pages 383-403, December.
    3. Chan, Kalok & Wang, Junbo & Wei, K. C. John, 2004. "Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 409-430, June.
    4. Francois Degeorge & Francois Derrien & Kent L. Womack, 2007. "Analyst Hype in IPOs: Explaining the Popularity of Bookbuilding," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 1021-1058.
    5. François Degeorge & François Derrien & Kent L. Womack, 2004. "Quid Pro Quo in IPOs: Why Book-building is Dominating Auctions," Working Papers 2004.150, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Sherman, Ann E, 2000. "IPOs and Long-Term Relationships: An Advantage of Book Building," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 697-714.
    7. Ibbotson, Roger G., 1975. "Price performance of common stock new issues," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 235-272, September.
    8. Jay R. Ritter, 2003. "Differences between European and American IPO Markets," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 9(4), pages 421-434, December.
    9. Benveniste, Lawrence M. & Spindt, Paul A., 1989. "How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 343-361.
    10. Reena Aggarwal, 2000. "Stabilization Activities by Underwriters after Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(3), pages 1075-1103, June.
    11. Rajan, Raghuram & Servaes, Henri, 1997. "Analyst Following of Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 507-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bekir Elmas & M.Sinan Temurlenk, 2009. "Granger Causality Between Stock Price and Trading Volume: A Stock-Based Analysis in the ISE," Istanbul Stock Exchange Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 11(43), pages 1-16.
    2. Halil Ýbrahim Bulut, 2009. "The Accuracy of Sales Forecasts Disclosed in the IPO Prospectuses: Evidence From Istanbul Stock Exchange," Istanbul Stock Exchange Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 11(43), pages 17-52.
    3. repec:bor:iserev:v:11:y:2011:i:43:p:53-80 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:bor:iserev:v:11:y:2011:i:43:p:17-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:bor:iserev:v:11:y:2011:i:43:p:1-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jay R. Ritter & Ivo Welch, 2002. "A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1795-1828, August.
    7. Guray Kucukkocaoglu & Ozge Sezgin Alp, 2012. "IPO mechanism selection by using Classification and Regression Trees," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 873-888, April.
    8. Oehler, Andreas & Rummer, Marco & Smith, Peter N., 2004. "IPO Pricing and the Relative Importance of Investor Sentiment: Evidence from Germany," Discussion Papers 26, University of Bamberg, Chair of Finance.
    9. Jones, Steven L. & Yeoman, John C., 2014. "Initial uncertainty and the risk of setting a fixed-offer price: Implications for the pricing of bookbuilt and best-efforts IPOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 194-215.
    10. Sascha Füllbrunn & Tibor Neugebauer & Andreas Nicklisch, 2020. "Underpricing of initial public offerings in experimental asset markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1002-1029, December.
    11. Pons-Sanz, Vicente, 2005. "Who benefits from IPO underpricing? Evidence form hybrid bookbuilding offerings," Working Paper Series 428, European Central Bank.
    12. Lehmann, Timo & Weber, Matthias, 2021. "IPO Underpricing and Aftermarket Price Accuracy: Auctions vs. Bookbuilding in Japan," SocArXiv sa385, Center for Open Science.
    13. Hanafi, Mamduh M., 2021. "Fixed price and book building methods in an exogenous environment: Evidence from Indonesia stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Hahl, Teemu & Vähämaa, Sami & Äijö, Janne, 2014. "Value versus growth in IPOs: New evidence from Finland," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-31.
    15. Cook, Douglas O. & Kieschnick, Robert & Van Ness, Robert A., 2006. "On the marketing of IPOs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 35-61, October.
    16. Kenneth A. Kim & Hyun‐Han Shin, 2004. "The Puzzling Increase in the Underpricing of Seasoned Equity Offerings," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 343-365, August.
    17. Neupane, Suman & Marshall, Andrew & Paudyal, Krishna & Thapa, Chandra, 2017. "Do investors flip less in bookbuilding than in auction IPOs?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 253-268.
    18. Guray Kucukkocaoglu, 2007. "Underpricing in Turkey: Comparison of the IPO Methods," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2006 8, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    19. Chen Su, 2018. "The efficiency of IPO issuing mechanisms and market conditions: evidence in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 461-495, August.
    20. Francois Degeorge & Francois Derrien & Kent L. Womack, 2007. "Analyst Hype in IPOs: Explaining the Popularity of Bookbuilding," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 1021-1058.
    21. Ma, Shiguang & Faff, Robert, 2007. "Market conditions and the optimal IPO allocation mechanism in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 121-139, April.
    22. Priyanka Singh & Brajesh Kumar, 2012. "Short Run and Long Run Dynamics of Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from India," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 87-113, June.
    23. Helbing, Pia & Lucey, Brian M. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2019. "The determinants of IPO withdrawal – Evidence from Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 415-436.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Initial Public Offering; IPO; underpricing; abnormal return; fixed price offer; book building; aftermarket performance of IPOs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bor:iserev:v:11:y:2009:i:43:p:53-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ahmet Palu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rdisetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.