IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bor/bistre/v15y2015i3p192-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital adequacy implications on Islamic and non-Islamic bank's behavior: Does market power matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Salma Louati
  • Ilhem Gargouri Abida
  • Younes Boujelbene

Abstract

After each crisis, reforms are carried out to prevent a new episode of financial crises. In this context, our objective in this study is to examine and simultaneously compare the behavior of Islamic and conventional banks in relation to the ratio of the capital adequacy in different competitive circumstances. We used data from 12 MENA and South East Asian countries characterized by the coexistence of Islamic and conventional banks. We concluded that the funding ratio has a significant impact on the behavior of 70 conventional banks and 47 Islamic banks. However, competitive conditions have no significant effect on the relationship between the weighted assets ratio and Islamic bank behavior, which means that this type of banks is applying theoretical models based on the prohibition of the interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Salma Louati & Ilhem Gargouri Abida & Younes Boujelbene, 2015. "Capital adequacy implications on Islamic and non-Islamic bank's behavior: Does market power matter?," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 15(3), pages 192-204, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:192-204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845015000150
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siti Nor Amira Mohamad & Mohamad Yazis Ali Basah & Muhammad Ridhwan Ab Aziz, 2018. "Examining Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) Performance after Recent Financial Crisis in Malaysian Banking System," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 129-134, May.
    2. Risfandy, Tastaftiyan & Tarazi, Amine & Trinugroho, Irwan, 2022. "Competition in dual markets: Implications for banking system stability," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Mateev, Miroslav & Moudud-Ul-Huq, Syed & Sahyouni, Ahmad & Tariq, Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Capital regulation, competition and risk-taking: Policy implications for banking sector stability in the MENA region," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Khemais Zaghdoudi, 2019. "The Effects of Risks on the Stability of Tunisian Conventional Banks," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 389-401, March.
    5. Hassan, M. Kabir & Aliyu, Sirajo, 2018. "A contemporary survey of islamic banking literature," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 12-43.
    6. Salma Zaiane & Fatma Ben Moussa, 2021. "What Drives Banking Profitability During Financial Crisis and Political Turmoil? Evidence from the MENA Region," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 13(3), pages 380-407, September.
    7. Nupur Moni Das & Joyeeta Deb, 2018. "A Statistical Re-assessment of Capital Adequacy and Insolvency Risk in Commercial Banks of India," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Aswini Kumar Mishra & Vairam Arunachalam & Debasis Patnaik (ed.), Current Issues in the Economy and Finance of India, chapter 0, pages 105-118, Springer.
    8. Mateev, Miroslav & Nasr, Tarek & Sahyouni, Ahmad, 2022. "Capital regulation, market power and bank risk-taking in the MENA region: New evidence for Islamic and conventional banks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 134-155.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bank competition; Capital adequacy ratio; Deposits and loans;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:192-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ahmet Palu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rdisetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.