IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v27y2011i2p195-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated parameter specification in dynamic feedback models based on behavior pattern features

Author

Listed:
  • Gönenç Yücel
  • Yaman Barlas

Abstract

In various stages of a modeling study, the developer/user encounters the need for identification of specific values for certain model parameters. However, due to the non‐linear nature of these models it is generally hard to foresee changes in the dynamic behavior as a consequence of even marginal parameter changes. Thus, the need for an automated and efficient search approach is very clear. A behavior pattern‐based parameter search approach and results obtained from various test experiments are presented in this paper. The pattern identification algorithm used enables a parameter search process based on qualitative features of a desired behavior pattern, even in the absence of a reference data series. The approach conducts the search process so as to obtain values for the model parameters that yield an output that matches the desired behavior in terms of its qualitative pattern features. Experiments conducted reveal the viability of the approach as a support tool that can be used in model calibration, sensitivity analysis, validation, and policy design stages. Copyright © 2011 System Dynamics Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Gönenç Yücel & Yaman Barlas, 2011. "Automated parameter specification in dynamic feedback models based on behavior pattern features," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 27(2), pages 195-215, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:195-215
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.457
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. John H. Miller, 1998. "Active Nonlinear Tests (ANTs) of Complex Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 820-830, June.
    3. R G Coyle, 1999. "Simulation by repeated optimisation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(4), pages 429-438, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    2. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    2. Sibel Eker & Jill Slinger & Els Daalen & Gönenç Yücel, 2014. "Sensitivity analysis of graphical functions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(3), pages 186-205, July.
    3. William Tracy, 2014. "Paradox Lost: The Evolution of Strategies in Selten’s Chain Store Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 43(1), pages 83-103, January.
    4. Margolis, David N. & Navarro, Lucas & Robalino, David A., 2012. "Unemployment Insurance, Job Search and Informal Employment," IZA Discussion Papers 6660, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Jan H. Kwakkel & Erik Pruyt, 2015. "Using System Dynamics for Grand Challenges: The ESDMA Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 358-375, May.
    6. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    7. Benjamin L. Turner & Hector M. Menendez & Roger Gates & Luis O. Tedeschi & Alberto S. Atzori, 2016. "System Dynamics Modeling for Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Issues: Review of Some Past Cases and Forecasting Future Roles," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    9. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and related analysis : A survey of statistical techniques," Other publications TiSEM bcf947da-25e3-431d-a1f6-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Thomas Spengler & Marcus Schröter, 2003. "Strategic Management of Spare Parts in Closed-Loop Supply Chains—A System Dynamics Approach," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 7-17, December.
    11. Komeil Mahjori Karmozdi & Mohammad Reza Kohansal & Mohammad Ghorbani, 2020. "Sustainable economic rural development system pattern in Ghaemshahr: an application of the developed TOP-MARD core model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5793-5817, August.
    12. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "White Noise Assumptions Revisited : Regression Models and Statistical Designs for Simulation Practice," Other publications TiSEM d8c37ad3-f9a5-4824-986d-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Eva Labro, 2015. "Using simulation methods in accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 99-104, August.
    14. Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Carlos López-Hernández & Alejandro Rodríguez-Magaña, 2023. "Modeling Organizational Resilience in SMEs: A System Dynamics Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 29-50, March.
    15. Daneshzand, Farzaneh & Asali, Mehdi & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Diabat, Ali & Elkamel, Ali, 2022. "A simulation-based optimization scheme for phase-out of natural gas subsidies considering welfare and economic measures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Keiki Takadama & Takao Terano & Katsunori Shimohara, 2003. "Interpretation by Implementation for Understanding a Multiagent Organization," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 19-35, May.
    17. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.
    18. Azad M. Madni & Michael Sievers, 2018. "Model‐based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 172-190, May.
    19. Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J. & Jochem, Patrick, 2019. "Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Vuillod, Bruno & Montemurro, Marco & Panettieri, Enrico & Hallo, Ludovic, 2023. "A comparison between Sobol’s indices and Shapley’s effect for global sensitivity analysis of systems with independent input variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:27:y:2011:i:2:p:195-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.