IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v34y2013i11p1367-1387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching

Author

Listed:
  • Lívia Markóczy
  • Sunny Li Sun
  • Mike W. Peng
  • Weilei (Stone) Shi
  • Bing Ren

Abstract

A firm's structural position within corporate networks may affect the extent to which it engages in boundary stretching practices. Since social norms support low CEO compensation, offering high CEO compensation in China can be seen as a boundary stretching practice. Setting up a compensation committee (CC) may be viewed as a form of symbolic management in China. We argue that firms operating within central corporate network positions opt to pay higher CEO compensation without engaging in symbolic management. On the other hand, firms operating in structural hole positions tend to either pay lower CEO compensation or use CCs as a symbolic management tool in order to pay higher CEO compensation. Our hypotheses are largely supported based on 7,618 firm‐year observations in China. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Lívia Markóczy & Sunny Li Sun & Mike W. Peng & Weilei (Stone) Shi & Bing Ren, 2013. "Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(11), pages 1367-1387, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:34:y:2013:i:11:p:1367-1387
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.2072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.2072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:34:y:2013:i:11:p:1367-1387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.