IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v24y2003i2p183-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D

Author

Listed:
  • Russell W. Coff
  • Peggy M. Lee

Abstract

While most insider trading is routine and legal, investors still treat it as new information about the firm's prospects—they assume that trades reflect managers' attempts to profit from their private information. This article explores insider trading as a mechanism to appropriate rent from R&D advances. We analyze stock price reactions to over 134,000 insider‐trading events and find that insider purchases generate larger positive stock price reactions for R&D‐intensive firms. Investors seem to assume that managers use insider trading to appropriate rent from R&D breakthroughs. We discuss how shareholders may prefer this rent appropriation mechanism over other forms of compensation that directly reduce the firm's income. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell W. Coff & Peggy M. Lee, 2003. "Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 183-190, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:183-190
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aya S. Chacar & William Hesterly, 2008. "Institutional settings and rent appropriation by knowledge-based employees: the case of Major League Baseball," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2-3), pages 117-136.
    2. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    3. Mary Beth Rousseau & Blake D. Mathias & Laura T. Madden & T. Russell Crook, 2016. "Innovation, Firm Performance, And Appropriation: A Meta-Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Saad, Mohsen & Zantout, Zaher, 2009. "Stock price and systematic risk effects of discontinuation of corporate R&D programs," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 568-581, September.
    5. Cuili Qian & Heli Wang & Xuesong Geng & Yangxin Yu, 2017. "Rent appropriation of knowledge-based assets and firm performance when institutions are weak: A study of Chinese publicly listed firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 892-911, April.
    6. Jianping Qi & Ninon K. Sutton & Qiancheng Zheng, 2020. "The value of innovation and the spillover effect on alliance partners," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1427-1457, November.
    7. Mehdi Beyhaghi & Pooyan Khashabi & Ali Mohammadi, 2023. "Pre-grant Patent Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 3140-3155, May.
    8. Mushtaq Hussain Khan, & Ahmad Fraz & Arshad Hassan, 2016. "The Diversification Puzzle: The Role of Asymmetric Information and Insider Trading in Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 97-119, July-Dec.
    9. Kun Liu & Jonathan D. Arthurs & Daeil Nam & Fariss-Terry Mousa, 2014. "Information diffusion and value redistribution among transaction partners of the IPO firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1717-1726, November.
    10. Dennis D. Malliouris & Alphons T. Vermorken & Maximilian A.M. Vermorken, 2022. "Aggregate insider trading and future market returns in the United States, Europe, and Asia," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 802-821, January.
    11. Steven Toms, 2010. "Value, profit and risk: accounting and the resource‐based view of the firm," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 647-670, June.
    12. Jianping Qi & Ninon K. Sutton & Qiancheng Zheng, 0. "The value of innovation and the spillover effect on alliance partners," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-31.
    13. Michelle Greenwood & Ken Kamoche, 2013. "Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 723-743, August.
    14. Marc T. Junkunc & Jonathan T. Eckhardt, 2009. "Technical Specialized Knowledge and Secondary Shares in Initial Public Offerings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1670-1687, October.
    15. Wu, Jie, 2013. "Marketing capabilities, institutional development, and the performance of emerging market firms: A multinational study," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 36-45.
    16. Renata Peregrino de Brito & Lucia Barbosa de Oliveira, 2016. "The Relationship Between Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(3), pages 90-110, May.
    17. Jonathan D. Arthurs & Lowell W. Busenitz & Robert E. Hoskisson & Richard A. Johnson, 2009. "Firm–Specific Human Capital and Governance in IPO Firms: Addressing Agency and Resource Dependence Concerns," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(4), pages 845-865, July.
    18. Kevin J. Johnson & Joé T. Martineau & Saouré Kouamé & Gokhan Turgut & Serge Poisson-de-Haro, 2018. "On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 917-929, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:183-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.