IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i4p1152-1163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Varieties of democracy and life satisfaction: Is there a connection?

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Bromo
  • Alexander C. Pacek
  • Benjamin Radcliff

Abstract

Objective How, if at all, do different “varieties” or “principles” of democracy affect human happiness? While the study of democracy's relationship with well‐being is an old one, recent conceptual developments in the study of democracy have not been assessed to a great extent. In this article, we attempt to address this shortcoming. Method We examine the relationship between five varieties of democracy (liberal, participatory, deliberative, egalitarian, and polyarchy) and life satisfaction across 103 high‐, middle‐, and low‐income countries in the 2010s. Results We find a modest, positive association between most democratic principles and self‐reported satisfaction. Further exploration indicates that the strongest association is the one between life satisfaction and participatory democracy. Conclusion This analysis represents an initial attempt at probing the effect of democracy on human happiness by disentangling the heterogeneous impact of different democratic principles. Implications for the study of democracy and subjective well‐being are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Bromo & Alexander C. Pacek & Benjamin Radcliff, 2024. "Varieties of democracy and life satisfaction: Is there a connection?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1152-1163, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1152-1163
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1152-1163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.