IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i6p1371-1380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining state differences in firearm legislation: A South/non‐South analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Kenter
  • Martin K. Mayer
  • John C. Morris

Abstract

Objective This article explores choices made by states in terms of opposition or support of firearm policies to determine what drives firearm restrictiveness and whether it varies by region. Methods Utilizing standard explanators of state policy choices, we employ a 50‐state pooled regression model, using data spanning 25 years to evaluate drivers of state policy decisions in terms of regional firearm restrictiveness. Results Evaluating firearm restrictiveness through several equally scored policy windows, including prohibitions for high‐risk gun possession, universal background checks, “stand your ground” laws, concealed carry permitting, and buyer regulations, the findings highlight the importance of ideology and poverty in explaining state firearm policy restrictiveness. Conclusion Our findings highlight the regional distinction and policy drivers that continue to make the South different from the rest of the nation in terms of firearm policy and restrictiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Kenter & Martin K. Mayer & John C. Morris, 2022. "Explaining state differences in firearm legislation: A South/non‐South analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1371-1380, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:6:p:1371-1380
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13193
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gornick, M.E., 2003. "A Decade of Research on Disparities in Medicare Utilization: Lessons for the Health and Health Care of Vulnerable Men," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(5), pages 753-759.
    2. Kivisto, A.J. & Ray, B. & Phalen, P.L., 2017. "Firearm legislation and fatal police shootings in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1068-1075.
    3. Erikson, Robert S. & Snyder Jr., James M. & Folke, Olle, 2012. "A Gubernatorial Helping Hand? How Governors Affect Presidential Elections," Working Paper Series 932, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303770_5 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Swedler, D.I. & Simmons, M.M. & Dominici, F. & Hemenway, D., 2015. "Firearm prevalence and homicides of law enforcement officers in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 2042-2048.
    6. Ruddell, Rick & Mays, G. Larry, 2005. "State background checks and firearms homicides," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 127-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Rogna & Bich Diep Nguyen, 2022. "Firearms law and fatal police shootings: a panel data analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(27), pages 3121-3137, June.
    2. Pak, Tae-Young, 2022. "The effects of mass shootings on gun sales: Motivations, mechanisms, policies and regulations," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1148-1164.
    3. Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya & Kelly, Grace, 2017. "Welfare Chauvinism? Refugee Flows and Electoral Support for Populist-right Parties in Industrial Democracies," MPRA Paper 81816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Schaffer, Mark & Kleck, Gary & Kovandzic, Tomislav, 2005. "Gun Prevalence, Homicide Rates and Causality: A GMM Approach to Endogeneity Bias," CEPR Discussion Papers 5357, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Mark Gius, 2015. "The effects of state and federal background checks on state-level gun-related murder rates," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(38), pages 4090-4101, August.
    6. Pak, Tae-Young, 2022. "The Effects of Mass Shootings on Gun Sales: Motivations, Mechanisms, Policies and Regulations," MPRA Paper 115706, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Bilgel, Firat, 2020. "State Gun Control Laws, Gun Ownership and the Supply of Homicide Organ Donors," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Armando Franco & Dana P. Goldman & Adam Leive & Daniel McFadden, 2017. "A Cautionary Tale in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Pitfalls and Perils of Observational Data Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring and Modeling Health Care Costs, pages 55-80, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Nathan T. Dollar & Iliya Gutin & Elizabeth M. Lawrence & David B. Braudt & Samuel Fishman & Richard G. Rogers & Robert A. Hummer, 2020. "The persistent southern disadvantage in US early life mortality, 1965‒2014," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(11), pages 343-382.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:6:p:1371-1380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.