IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i1p108-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self and political efficacy and the justifiability of political violence and the role of state terror: A cross‐national analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nabil “Bill” Julkif

Abstract

Objective This article looks at whether political and self‐efficacy predict the justifiability of political violence and terrorism. Methods Utilizing the World Values Survey sample of 41,178 respondents from 31 countries, this article uses a mixed effect logistic regression with country‐level random intercepts to answer the research question and test the hypothesis. Results Self‐efficacy predicts less support for political violence or justifiability of terrorism, and less political efficacy predicts less support for terrorism while not influencing political violence in a significant manner. The interaction between self‐efficacy and economic insecurity was significant with high economic security and low self‐efficacy predicting more justifiability of terrorism. Conclusions Support is found for Saab et al. (2016) “gun and the olive branch” thesis. Specifically, being politically efficacious and finding conventional political activism efficacious does not reduce support for political violence. However, finding conventional activism efficacious makes one less likely to find terrorism justifiable. Support is also found for the prosocial effect of self‐efficacy (Rottweiler and Gill 2020).

Suggested Citation

  • Nabil “Bill” Julkif, 2022. "Self and political efficacy and the justifiability of political violence and the role of state terror: A cross‐national analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(1), pages 108-119, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:1:p:108-119
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13120
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karin Dyrstad & Solveig Hillesund, 2020. "Explaining Support for Political Violence: Grievance and Perceived Opportunity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1724-1753, October.
    2. David Cingranelli & Skip Mark & Mark Gibney & Peter Haschke & Reed Wood & Daniel Arnon, 2019. "Human Rights Violations and Violent Internal Conflict," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Sabine C. Carey, 2010. "The Use of Repression as a Response to Domestic Dissent," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 167-186, February.
    4. Daxecker, Ursula E. & Hess, Michael L., 2013. "Repression Hurts: Coercive Government Responses and the Demise of Terrorist Campaigns," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 559-577, July.
    5. Keefer, Philip & Knack, Stephen, 2002. "Polarization, Politics and Property Rights: Links between Inequality and Growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 111(1-2), pages 127-154, March.
    6. Sabine C. Carey, 2010. "The Use of Repression as a Response to Domestic Dissent," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 167-186, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabine C Carey & Belén González, 2021. "The legacy of war: The effect of militias on postwar repression," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(3), pages 247-269, May.
    2. Jacqueline H.R. DeMeritt & Joseph K Young, 2013. "A political economy of human rights: Oil, natural gas, and state incentives to repress1," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(2), pages 99-120, April.
    3. Bjørnskov, Christian & Pfaff, Katharina, 2021. "Differences matter: The effect of coup types on physical integrity rights," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Timothy M. Peterson, 2017. "Export Diversity and Human Rights," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(8), pages 1740-1767, September.
    5. Kimberly Turner, 2023. "A win or a flop? Measuring mass protest successfulness in authoritarian settings," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(1), pages 107-123, January.
    6. Sultan Juma Kakuba, 2021. "State Repression and Democratic Dispensation in Uganda 1996–2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    7. Amanda A Licht & Susan Hannah Allen, 2018. "Repressing for reputation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 582-595, September.
    8. Sam R Bell & David Cingranelli & Amanda Murdie & Alper Caglayan, 2013. "Coercion, capacity, and coordination: Predictors of political violence," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(3), pages 240-262, July.
    9. Jansesberger, Viktoria & Spilker, Gabriele, 2024. "Silencing dissent in the wake of catastrophe? An examination of the repression dynamics following weather-related rapid-onset events in autocracies," Working Papers 27, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    10. Brandon M. Boylan, 2016. "What drives ethnic terrorist campaigns? A view at the group level of analysis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 250-272, July.
    11. Christopher M. Sullivan, 2016. "Undermining Resistance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 60(7), pages 1163-1190, October.
    12. Margarita Konaev & Kirstin J.H. Brathwaite, 2019. "Dangerous neighborhoods: State behavior and the spread of ethnic conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 447-468, September.
    13. Noah Buckley & Ora John Reuter & Michael Rochlitz & Anton Aisin, 2020. "Staying Out of Trouble: Criminal Cases Against Russian Mayors," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2013, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    14. Asif Efrat, 2015. "Do human rights violations hinder counterterrorism cooperation? Evidence from the FBI’s deployment abroad," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 329-349, September.
    15. Sam R Bell & Amanda Murdie, 2018. "The apparatus for violence: Repression, violent protest, and civil war in a cross-national framework," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(4), pages 336-354, July.
    16. Kholeka Mdingi & Sin-Yu Ho, 2023. "Income inequality and economic growth: An empirical investigation in South Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 2230027-223, June.
    17. Ionuț Jianu & Marin Dinu & Dragoș Huru & Alexandru Bodislav, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Income Inequality and Growth from the Perspective of EU Member States’ Stage of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Batuo, Michael E. & Kararach, George & Malki, Issam, 2022. "The dynamics of income inequality in Africa: An empirical investigation on the role of macroeconomic and institutional forces," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Vu, Trung V., 2021. "Do genetically fragmented societies respond less to global warming? Diversity and climate change policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    20. Alberto Alesina & Eliana La Ferrara, 2003. "Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 2028, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:1:p:108-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.