IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v48y2021i3p930-949.html

Accounting for model uncertainty in multiple imputation under complex sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Gyuhyeong Goh
  • Jae Kwang Kim

Abstract

Multiple imputation provides an effective way to handle missing data. When several possible models are under consideration for the data, multiple imputation is typically performed under a single‐best model selected from the candidate models. This single‐model selection approach ignores the uncertainty associated with the model selection and so leads to underestimation of the variance of multiple imputation estimator. In this article, we propose a new multiple imputation procedure incorporating model uncertainty in the final inference. The proposed method incorporates possible candidate models for the data into the imputation procedure using the idea of Bayesian model averaging. The proposed method is directly applicable to handling item nonresponse in survey sampling. Asymptotic properties of the proposed method are investigated. A limited simulation study confirms that our model averaging approach provides better estimation performance than the single‐model selection approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyuhyeong Goh & Jae Kwang Kim, 2021. "Accounting for model uncertainty in multiple imputation under complex sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 930-949, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:930-949
    DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sjos.12473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jae Kwang Kim & J. Michael Brick & Wayne A. Fuller & Graham Kalton, 2006. "On the bias of the multiple‐imputation variance estimator in survey sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 509-521, June.
    2. S. Yang & J. K. Kim, 2016. "A note on multiple imputation for method of moments estimation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(1), pages 244-251.
    3. Dey, Dipak K. & Birmiwal, Lea R., 1994. "Robust Bayesian analysis using divergence measures," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 287-294, July.
    4. J. K. Kim & S. Yang, 2017. "A note on multiple imputation under complex sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(1), pages 221-228.
    5. Jeremy York & David Madigan & Ivar Heuch & Rolv Terje Lie, 1995. "Birth Defects Registered by Double Sampling: A Bayesian Approach Incorporating Covariates and Model Uncertainty," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 44(2), pages 227-242, June.
    6. Z Wang & J K Kim & S Yang, 2018. "Approximate Bayesian inference under informative sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(1), pages 91-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojun Mao & Zhonglei Wang & Shu Yang, 2023. "Matrix completion under complex survey sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(3), pages 463-492, June.
    2. Rahardja, Dewi & Young, Dean M., 2010. "Credible sets for risk ratios in over-reported two-sample binomial data using the double-sampling scheme," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1281-1287, May.
    3. Hang J. Kim & Jörg Drechsler & Katherine J. Thompson, 2021. "Synthetic microdata for establishment surveys under informative sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 255-281, January.
    4. Corder Nathan & Yang Shu, 2020. "Estimating Average Treatment Effects Utilizing Fractional Imputation when Confounders are Subject to Missingness," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 249-271, January.
    5. Toni P. Miles & Changle Li & M. Mahmud Khan & Rana Bayakly & Deborah Carr, 2023. "Estimating Prevalence of Bereavement, Its Contribution to Risk for Binge Drinking, and Other High-Risk Health States in a State Population Survey, 2019 Georgia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Luai Al-Labadi & Zhirui Chu & Ying Xu, 2025. "Advancements in Rényi entropy and divergence estimation for model assessment," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 633-650, February.
    7. Nandram, Balgobin & Zelterman, Daniel, 2007. "Computational Bayesian inference for estimating the size of a finite population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 2934-2945, March.
    8. Andrzej Młodak, 2021. "An application of a complex measure to model–based imputation in business statistics," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Giles Hooker & Anand Vidyashankar, 2014. "Bayesian model robustness via disparities," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(3), pages 556-584, September.
    10. Kristin McCullough & Tatiana Dmitrieva & Nader Ebrahimi, 2022. "New approximate Bayesian computation algorithm for censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1369-1397, July.
    11. Shu Yang & Yilong Zhang & Guanghan Frank Liu & Qian Guan, 2023. "SMIM: A unified framework of survival sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation and martingale," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 230-240, March.
    12. Yongqiang Tang, 2017. "On the multiple imputation variance estimator for control‐based and delta‐adjusted pattern mixture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1379-1387, December.
    13. Młodak Andrzej, 2021. "An application of a complex measure to model–based imputation in business statistics," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 22(1), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Lyasmine Harrouche & Hocine Fellag & Lynda Atil, 2025. "Bayesian prior robustness using general $$\phi $$ ϕ -divergence measure," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Shaun R. Seaman & Ian R. White & Andrew J. Copas & Leah Li, 2012. "Combining Multiple Imputation and Inverse-Probability Weighting," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 129-137, March.
    16. Sullivan, Danielle & Andridge, Rebecca, 2015. "A hot deck imputation procedure for multiply imputing nonignorable missing data: The proxy pattern-mixture hot deck," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 173-185.
    17. Abhik Ghosh & Ayanendranath Basu, 2016. "Robust Bayes estimation using the density power divergence," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(2), pages 413-437, April.
    18. Kreutzmann, Ann-Kristin & Marek, Philipp & Salvati, Nicola & Schmid, Timo, 2019. "Estimating regional wealth in Germany: How different are East and West really?," Discussion Papers 35/2019, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    19. Basu, Sanjib, 2000. "Uniform stability of posteriors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 53-58, January.
    20. Andridge Rebecca R. & Little Roderick J.A., 2020. "Proxy Pattern-Mixture Analysis for a Binary Variable Subject to Nonresponse," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(3), pages 703-728, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:930-949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.