IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i5p1281-1287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credible sets for risk ratios in over-reported two-sample binomial data using the double-sampling scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Rahardja, Dewi
  • Young, Dean M.

Abstract

We consider point and interval estimation for risk ratios based on two independent samples of binomial data subject to false positive misclassification. For such data it is well known that the model is unidentifiable. We consider incorporating training data obtained by using a double-sampling scheme to make the model identifiable. In this identifiable model, we propose a Bayesian method to make statistical inferences. In particular, we derive an easy-to-implement closed-form algorithm for drawing from the posterior distributions. The algorithm is illustrated using a real data example and further examined via Monte Carlo simulation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahardja, Dewi & Young, Dean M., 2010. "Credible sets for risk ratios in over-reported two-sample binomial data using the double-sampling scheme," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1281-1287, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:5:p:1281-1287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00414-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy York & David Madigan & Ivar Heuch & Rolv Terje Lie, 1995. "Birth Defects Registered by Double Sampling: A Bayesian Approach Incorporating Covariates and Model Uncertainty," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 44(2), pages 227-242, June.
    2. Moors, J.J.A. & van der Genugten, B.B. & Strijbosch, L.W.G., 1997. "Repeated Audit Controls," Discussion Paper 1997-113, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Paul Gustafson & Nhu D. Le & Refik Saskin, 2001. "Case–Control Analysis with Partial Knowledge of Exposure Misclassification Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 598-609, June.
    4. Boese, Doyle H. & Young, Dean M. & Stamey, James D., 2006. "Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter based on binary data subject to false-positive misclassification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3369-3385, August.
    5. Anil Gaba & Robert L. Winkler, 1992. "Implications of Errors in Survey Data: A Bayesian Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(7), pages 913-925, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahardja, Dewi & Young, Dean M., 2011. "Likelihood-based confidence intervals for the risk ratio using double sampling with over-reported binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 813-823, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahardja, Dewi & Young, Dean M., 2011. "Likelihood-based confidence intervals for the risk ratio using double sampling with over-reported binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 813-823, January.
    2. Al-Kandari Noriah M. & Lahiri Partha, 2016. "Prediction of a Function of Misclassified Binary Data," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 17(3), pages 429-447, September.
    3. Noriah M. Al-Kandari & Partha Lahiri, 2016. "Prediction Of A Function Of Misclassified Binary Data," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 17(3), pages 429-447, September.
    4. Boese, Doyle H. & Young, Dean M. & Stamey, James D., 2006. "Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter based on binary data subject to false-positive misclassification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 3369-3385, August.
    5. Partha Lahiri & Noriah M. Al-Kandari, 2016. "Prediction of a Function of Misclassified Binary Data," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 17(3), pages 429-447, September.
    6. Nandram, Balgobin & Zelterman, Daniel, 2007. "Computational Bayesian inference for estimating the size of a finite population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 2934-2945, March.
    7. Martijn van Hasselt & Christopher R. Bollinger & Jeremy W. Bray, 2022. "A Bayesian approach to account for misclassification in prevalence and trend estimation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 351-367, March.
    8. Raats, V.M. & Moors, J.J.A., 2000. "Double Checking for Two Error Types," Other publications TiSEM 377fb0f1-fc2f-44ce-b75c-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Quinino, R. C. & Lee Ho, L., 2004. "Repetitive tests as an economic alternative procedure to control attributes with diagnosis errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 209-225, May.
    10. Stamey, James D. & Boese, Doyle H. & Young, Dean M., 2008. "Confidence intervals for parameters of two diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1335-1346, January.
    11. Raats, V.M. & Moors, J.J.A. & van der Genugten, B.B., 2004. "A Mixed Model for Double Checking Fallible Auditors," Discussion Paper 2004-82, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    12. T. Pham-Gia & N. Turkhan, 2005. "Bayesian decision criteria in the presence of noises under quadratic and absolute value loss functions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 247-266, April.
    13. Raats, V.M. & Moors, J.J.A. & van der Genugten, B.B., 2004. "A Mixed Model for Double Checking Fallible Auditors," Other publications TiSEM 847311c8-d871-4942-b5e3-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. K. Chitakasempornkul & G. J. M. Rosa & A. Jager & N. M. Bello, 2020. "Hierarchical Modeling of Structural Coefficients for Heterogeneous Networks with an Application to Animal Production Systems," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Dewi Rahardja, 2019. "Bayesian Inference for the Difference of Two Proportion Parameters in Over-Reported Two-Sample Binomial Data Using the Doubly Sample," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, February.
    16. Paul Gustafson & Nhu D. Le, 2002. "Comparing the Effects of Continuous and Discrete Covariate Mismeasurement, with Emphasis on the Dichotomization of Mismeasured Predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 878-887, December.
    17. Tang, Man-Lai & Qiu, Shi-Fang & Poon, Wai-Yin, 2012. "Confidence interval construction for disease prevalence based on partial validation series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1200-1220.
    18. Xavier Sala-I-Martin & Gernot Doppelhofer & Ronald I. Miller, 2004. "Determinants of Long-Term Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 813-835, September.
    19. Anil Gaba & W. Kip Viscusi, 1998. "Differences in Subjective Risk Thresholds: Worker Groups as an Example," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 801-811, June.
    20. Wang Dongxu & Shen Tian & Gustafson Paul, 2012. "Partial Identification arising from Nondifferential Exposure Misclassification: How Informative are Data on the Unlikely, Maybe, and Likely Exposed?," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:5:p:1281-1287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.